Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像中肱骨头在关节盂上的正常位置范围:通过计算机断层扫描与磁共振成像的比较进行验证

Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

作者信息

Kim Jung-Han, Min Young-Kyoung

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Shoulder Elb. 2018 Dec 1;21(4):186-191. doi: 10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.186. eCollection 2018 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine the normal range of humeral head positioning on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

We selected normal subjects (64 patients; group A) to study the normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid by MRI measurements. To compare the MRI measurement method with the computed tomography (CT), we selected group B (70 patients) who underwent both MRI and CT. We measured the humeral-scapular alignment (HSA) and the humeral-glenoid alignment (HGA).

RESULTS

The HSA in the control group was 1.47 ± 1.05 mm, and the HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.15 ± 0.65 mm and 1.03 ± 0.59 mm, respectively, on MRI. In the test group, HSA was 2.67 ± 1.47 mm and HGA with and without reconstruction was 1.58 ± 1.16 mm and 1.49 ± 1.08 mm, on MRI. On CT, the HSA was 1.72 ± 1.01 mm, and HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.54 ± 0.96 mm and 1.59 ± 0.93 mm, respectively. HSA was significantly different according to image modality (=0.0006), but HGA was not significantly different regardless of reconstruction (=0.8836 and 0.9234).

CONCLUSIONS

Although additional CT scans can be taken to measure decentering in patients with rotator cuff tears, reliable measurements can be obtained with MRI alone. When using MRI, it is better to use HGA, which is a more reliable measurement value based on the comparison with CT measurement (study design: Study of Diagnostic Test; Level of evidence II).

摘要

背景

确定磁共振成像(MRI)上肱骨头定位的正常范围。

方法

我们选择正常受试者(64例患者;A组),通过MRI测量研究肱骨头在肩胛盂上的正常定位范围。为了将MRI测量方法与计算机断层扫描(CT)进行比较,我们选择了同时接受MRI和CT检查的B组(70例患者)。我们测量了肱骨-肩胛对齐(HSA)和肱骨-肩胛盂对齐(HGA)。

结果

在MRI上,对照组的HSA为1.47±1.05mm,重建前后的HGA分别为1.15±0.65mm和1.03±0.59mm。在测试组中,MRI上的HSA为2.67±1.47mm,重建前后的HGA分别为1.58±1.16mm和1.49±1.08mm。在CT上,HSA为1.72±1.01mm,重建前后的HGA分别为1.54±0.96mm和1.59±0.93mm。根据成像方式,HSA有显著差异(=0.0006),但无论是否重建,HGA均无显著差异(=0.8836和0.9234)。

结论

虽然对于肩袖撕裂患者可以额外进行CT扫描以测量偏心情况,但仅通过MRI就能获得可靠的测量结果。使用MRI时,最好使用HGA,基于与CT测量的比较,HGA是更可靠的测量值(研究设计:诊断试验研究;证据级别:II级)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dc0/7726408/b68a32a9af2a/cise-2018-21-4-186f1.jpg

相似文献

5
Superior glenoid inclination and rotator cuff tears.肩盂上倾斜角与肩袖撕裂。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Aug;27(8):1444-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.043. Epub 2018 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

7
Accuracy of the glenohumeral subluxation index in nonpathologic shoulders.非病理性肩关节中肩肱关节半脱位指数的准确性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Apr;24(4):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验