Suppr超能文献

优秀青少年足球运动员的跑动模式和速度冲刺特征:一项横断面研究。

Running patterns and force-velocity sprinting profiles in elite training young soccer players: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Univ. Lyon, UCBL-Lyon 1, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, Villeurbanne, France.

Laboratoire Motricité, Interactions, Performance, MIP - EA4334, Le Mans Université, Le Mans Cedex 9, France.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Dec;21(12):1718-1726. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1866078. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

Abstract

The Volodalen® field method permits to classify runners into aerial or terrestrial, based on vertical oscillation, upper-body motion, pelvis and foot position at ground contact, and foot strike pattern. The present study aimed to compare the sprint running force-velocity profiles between aerial and terrestrial runners. Sixty-Four French National-Level young soccer players (28 females, 36 males) performed three trials of unloaded maximal 40 m sprints. External horizontal power-force-velocity relationships were computed using a validated biomechanical model and based on the velocity-time curve. Accordingly, the participants were classified into patterns in aerial and terrestrial runners. Terrestrial runners showed a higher maximal horizontal force () (6.73 ± 1.03 vs 6.01 ± 0.94 N·kg), maximal horizontal power () (14.04 ± 3.24 vs 12.51 ± 3.31W·kg), maximal acceleration () (6.83 ± 0.85 vs 6.26 ± 0.89 m·s), and maximal rate of horizontal force () (57.41 ± 4.64 vs 52.81 ± 5.69%) compared to aerial runners. In contrast, terrestrial runners displayed a more negative rate of decrease of () (-11.65 ± 1.71 vs -10.23 ± 1.66%) and slope of the Force-Velocity relationship (F-V slope) (-0.83 ± 0.11 vs -0.77 ± 0.10 N·s·m·kg) than aerial runners. The results indicate that terrestrial runners displayed more efficient force production in the forward direction and displayed more "force-oriented" F-V profiles. Nevertheless, aerial runners were more effective in maintaining a net horizontal force production with increasing speed. Our results suggest that terrestrial runners could be more adapted to the specific short distance and high acceleration sprints running.

摘要

沃洛达伦®田野测试方法可以根据垂直摆动、上半身运动、骨盆和脚部在触地时的位置以及脚部着地方式,将跑步者分为空中跑步者或地面跑步者。本研究旨在比较空中跑步者和地面跑步者的短跑力-速度曲线特征。64 名法国国家级年轻足球运动员(女性 28 人,男性 36 人)进行了 3 次无负荷最大 40m 冲刺试验。使用验证过的生物力学模型和基于速度-时间曲线,计算了外部水平力-力-速度关系。根据这些关系,参与者被分为空中跑步者和地面跑步者。与空中跑步者相比,地面跑步者的最大水平力()更高(6.73±1.03 比 6.01±0.94 N·kg)、最大水平功率()更高(14.04±3.24 比 12.51±3.31 W·kg)、最大加速度()更高(6.83±0.85 比 6.26±0.89 m·s)、最大水平力下降率()更高(57.41±4.64 比 52.81±5.69%)。相比之下,地面跑步者的(-11.65±1.71 比-10.23±1.66%)和力-速度关系斜率(F-V 斜率)(-0.83±0.11 比-0.77±0.10 N·s·m·kg)更负。结果表明,地面跑步者在向前方向上产生的力更有效,表现出更“力导向”的 F-V 曲线特征。然而,空中跑步者在提高速度时更有效地保持净水平力的产生。我们的研究结果表明,地面跑步者可能更适应特定的短距离和高加速度短跑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验