Philosophical investigations into the essence of pediatric suffering.
作者信息
Tate Tyler
机构信息
Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Center for Ethics in Health Care, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
出版信息
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):137-142. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09531-y. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Philosophical investigations into the essence of pediatric suffering.对儿童痛苦本质的哲学探究。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):137-142. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09531-y. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
What we talk about when we talk about pediatric suffering.当我们谈论儿科患者的痛苦时，我们在谈论什么。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):143-163. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09535-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
[The meaning of suffering (1). The essence of suffering].[苦难的意义（1）。苦难的本质]
ZFA (Stuttgart). 1983 Oct 20;59(29):1591-6.
4
It started with a kiss.一切始于一个吻。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Oct;42(10):638-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103619. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
5
The implications of complexity, systems thinking and philosophy for pediatricians.复杂性、系统思维和哲学对儿科医生的意义。
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Mar 25;47(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01031-6.
6
American Pediatric Society Presidential Address 2003: the failure of Ockham's razor in 21st century pediatrics.2003年美国儿科学会主席演讲：奥卡姆剃刀原则在21世纪儿科学中的失效
Pediatr Res. 2004 Jun;55(6):903-7. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000125256.53953.48. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
7
Pain and the senses.疼痛与感觉。
Ciba Found Symp. 1979(69):315-33. doi: 10.1002/9780470720523.ch19.
8
Puzzling pain conditions: how philosophy can help us understand them.令人困惑的疼痛状况：哲学如何能帮助我们理解它们。
Pain Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;6(4):315-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00046.x.
9
Pediatric palliative care.儿童姑息治疗
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2010 Jul;40(6):120-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2010.05.001.
10
[Pain as an experience constituting body and identity].[作为构成身体和身份认同的体验的疼痛]
Schmerz. 2016 Aug;30(4):323-6. doi: 10.1007/s00482-016-0128-3.
引用本文的文献
1
What we talk about when we talk about pediatric suffering.当我们谈论儿科患者的痛苦时，我们在谈论什么。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):143-163. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09535-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Relational suffering and the moral authority of love and care.关系性痛苦与爱和关怀的道德权威。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):165-178. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09530-z.
3
Our suffering and the suffering of our time.我们的苦难以及我们这个时代的苦难。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):197-201. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09529-6.
本文引用的文献
1
What we talk about when we talk about pediatric suffering.当我们谈论儿科患者的痛苦时，我们在谈论什么。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):143-163. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09535-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Valuing life and evaluating suffering in infants with life-limiting illness.重视生命并评估患有生命有限疾病的婴儿的痛苦。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):179-196. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09532-x. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
Relational suffering and the moral authority of love and care.关系性痛苦与爱和关怀的道德权威。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):165-178. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09530-z.
4
Our suffering and the suffering of our time.我们的苦难以及我们这个时代的苦难。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):197-201. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09529-6.
5
The new futility? The rhetoric and role of "suffering" in pediatric decision-making.新的无益之举？“痛苦”在儿科决策中的言辞和作用。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):16-27. doi: 10.1177/0969733019840745. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
6
Validity and responsiveness of the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales in the pediatric inpatient setting.儿科生存质量量表（PedsQL）4.0 通用核心量表在儿科住院环境中的有效性和反应性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Dec;168(12):1114-21. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1600.
7
We cannot accurately predict the extent of an infant's future suffering: the Groningen Protocol is too dangerous to support.我们无法准确预测婴儿未来遭受痛苦的程度：格罗宁根议定书支持起来太危险了。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):27-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513150.
8
Paediatric ethics: a repudiation of the Groningen protocol.儿科伦理学：对格罗宁根协议的驳斥。
Lancet. 2008 Mar 15;371(9616):892-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60402-x.
9
Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?对于一个智障婴儿来说，死亡符合其最大利益吗？
J Med Ethics. 2006 Aug;32(8):454-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013508.
10
Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications.医疗无效：其含义及伦理意义。
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jun 15;112(12):949-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-12-949.
Zotero 插件