• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重视生命并评估患有生命有限疾病的婴儿的痛苦。

Valuing life and evaluating suffering in infants with life-limiting illness.

机构信息

Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):179-196. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09532-x. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11017-020-09532-x
PMID:33331998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7745707/
Abstract

In this paper, we explore three separate questions that are relevant to assessing the prudential value of life in infants with severe life-limiting illness. First, what is the value or disvalue of a short life? Is it in the interests of a child to save her life if she will nevertheless die in infancy or very early childhood? Second, how does profound cognitive impairment affect the balance of positives and negatives in a child's future life? Third, if the life of a child with life-limiting illness is prolonged, how much suffering will she experience and can any of it be alleviated? Is there a risk that negative experiences for such a child (suffering) will remain despite the provision of palliative care? We argue that both the subjective and objective components of well-being for children could be greatly reduced if they are anticipated to have a short life that is affected by profound cognitive impairment. This does not mean that their overall well-being will be negative, but rather that there may be a higher risk of negative overall well-being if they are expected to experience pain, discomfort, or distress. Furthermore, we point to some of the practical limitations of therapies aimed at relieving suffering, such that there is a risk that suffering will go partially or completely unrelieved. Taken together, these considerations imply that some life-prolonging treatments are not in the best interests of infants with severe life-limiting illness.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨了三个与评估患有严重生命限制疾病的婴儿的审慎生命价值相关的独立问题。首先,短暂的生命有何价值或无价值?如果一个孩子在婴儿期或幼儿期内仍将死亡,那么拯救她的生命是否符合她的利益?其次,严重认知障碍如何影响孩子未来生活中的正负平衡?第三,如果患有生命限制疾病的孩子的生命得以延长,她将经历多少痛苦,能否减轻任何痛苦?对于这样一个孩子(痛苦),是否存在负面经历仍然存在的风险,尽管提供了姑息治疗?我们认为,如果孩子预期寿命短暂且受到严重认知障碍的影响,那么他们的主观和客观幸福感都会大大降低。这并不意味着他们的整体幸福感将是负面的,而是说如果他们预计会经历疼痛、不适或痛苦,那么他们整体幸福感呈负面的风险可能更高。此外,我们还指出了一些旨在减轻痛苦的治疗方法的实际局限性,因此存在痛苦部分或完全无法缓解的风险。综上所述,这些考虑表明,一些延长生命的治疗方法并不符合患有严重生命限制疾病的婴儿的最佳利益。

相似文献

1
Valuing life and evaluating suffering in infants with life-limiting illness.重视生命并评估患有生命有限疾病的婴儿的痛苦。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):179-196. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09532-x. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
Parents' perspective on symptoms, quality of life, characteristics of death and end-of-life decisions for children dying from cancer.父母对患癌濒死儿童的症状、生活质量、死亡特征及临终决策的看法。
Klin Padiatr. 2008 May-Jun;220(3):166-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1065347.
5
Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?对于一个智障婴儿来说,死亡符合其最大利益吗?
J Med Ethics. 2006 Aug;32(8):454-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013508.
6
Infants' best interests in end-of-life care for newborns.新生儿末期医疗照护中婴儿的最大利益。
Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e1163-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0780. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
7
Parental perspectives on suffering and quality of life at end-of-life in children with advanced heart disease: an exploratory study*.父母对晚期心脏病儿童临终时的痛苦和生活质量的看法:一项探索性研究*。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 May;15(4):336-42. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000072.
8
How much weight should we give to parental interests in decisions about life support for newborn infants?在关于新生儿生命维持的决策中,我们应该在多大程度上考虑父母的利益?
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2010 Sep;29(2):13.1-25. doi: 10.1007/BF03351523.
9
Pediatric palliative care.儿童姑息治疗
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2010 Jul;40(6):120-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2010.05.001.
10
The legal basis for ethical withholding and withdrawing of life-sustaining medical treatment in children.儿童维持生命的医疗治疗的伦理放弃与撤除的法律依据。
J Law Med. 2006 Nov;14(2):244-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician Distress with Treatments at the Frontier of Mortality.临床医生对濒死前沿治疗的苦恼。
J Pediatr. 2023 Jan;252:183-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.09.013. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
2
What we talk about when we talk about pediatric suffering.当我们谈论儿科患者的痛苦时,我们在谈论什么。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):143-163. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09535-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Philosophical investigations into the essence of pediatric suffering.对儿童痛苦本质的哲学探究。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):137-142. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09531-y. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Our suffering and the suffering of our time.我们的苦难以及我们这个时代的苦难。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Aug;41(4):197-201. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09529-6.