Institute for Clinical Exercise & Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, United Kingdom.
Oriam, Scotland's Sports Performance Center, Heriot-Watt University, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Jan 1;35(1):16-24. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002651.
Williams, MJ, Gibson, N, Sorbie, GG, Ugbolue, UC, Brouner, J, and Easton, C. Activation of the gluteus maximus during performance of the back squat, split squat, and barbell hip thrust and the relationship with maximal sprinting. J Strength Cond Res 35(1): 16-24, 2021-The purpose of this research was to compare muscle activation of the gluteus maximus and ground reaction force between the barbell hip thrust, back squat, and split squat and to determine the relationship between these outcomes and vertical and horizontal forces during maximal sprinting. Twelve, male, team sport athletes (age, 25.0 ± 4.0 years; stature, 184.1 ± 6.0 cm; body mass, 82.2 ± 7.9 kg) performed separate movements of the 3 strength exercises at a load equivalent to their individual 3 repetition maximum. The ground reaction force was measured using force plates and the electromyography (EMG) activity of the upper and lower gluteus maximus and was recorded in each leg and expressed as percentage of the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Subjects then completed a single sprint on a nonmotorized treadmill for the assessment of maximal velocity and horizontal and vertical forces. Although ground reaction force was lower, peak EMG activity in the gluteus maximus was higher in the hip thrust than in the back squat (p = 0.024; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4-56% MVIC) and split squat (p = 0.016; 95% CI = 6-58% MVIC). Peak sprint velocity correlated with both anterior-posterior horizontal force (r = 0.72) and peak ground reaction force during the barbell hip thrust (r = 0.69) but no other variables. The increased activation of gluteus maximus during the barbell hip thrust and the relationship with maximal running speed suggests that this movement may be optimal for training this muscle group in comparison to the back squat and split squat.
威廉姆斯,MJ,吉布森,N,索比,GG,乌格博鲁,UC,布鲁纳,J,和伊斯顿,C。在进行杠铃臀推、分腿蹲和杠铃髋关节推举时,臀大肌的激活情况,以及与最大冲刺速度的关系。J 力量与条件研究 35(1):16-24,2021-这项研究的目的是比较臀大肌的肌肉激活和地面反作用力在杠铃髋关节推举、深蹲和分腿蹲之间的差异,并确定这些结果与最大冲刺速度时垂直和水平力之间的关系。12 名男性团队运动运动员(年龄,25.0±4.0 岁;身高,184.1±6.0cm;体重,82.2±7.9kg)以相当于个人 3 次最大重复次数的负荷进行了 3 种力量练习的单独运动。地面反作用力使用测力板测量,臀大肌的上部和下部的肌电图(EMG)活动记录在每条腿上,并表示为最大随意等长收缩(MVIC)的百分比。然后,受试者在非电动跑步机上完成一次单冲刺,以评估最大速度和水平力和垂直力。尽管地面反作用力较低,但髋关节推举时臀大肌的峰值 EMG 活动高于深蹲(p=0.024;95%置信区间[CI]=4-56%MVIC)和分腿蹲(p=0.016;95%CI=6-58%MVIC)。峰值冲刺速度与前后向水平力(r=0.72)和杠铃髋关节推举时的峰值地面反作用力(r=0.69)相关,但与其他变量无关。与后蹲和分腿蹲相比,杠铃髋关节推举时臀大肌的激活增加,以及与最大跑步速度的关系表明,与后蹲和分腿蹲相比,该运动可能更适合训练该肌肉群。