Suppr超能文献

关节镜下囊松解术治疗特发性冻结肩:需要松解多少?

Arthroscopic capsular release to treat idiopathic frozen shoulder: How much release is needed?

机构信息

University Orthopaedics, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgical Cluster, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 11, 119228 Singapore, Singapore.

University Orthopaedics, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgical Cluster, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 11, 119228 Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1):102766. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102766. Epub 2021 Jan 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide consensus regarding the degree of optimal extended arthroscopic capsular release in addition to a standard rotator interval release in the treatment of idiopathic frozen shoulder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All articles that reported the outcomes of capsular release in idiopathic frozen shoulder were included. A total of 18 articles with 629 patients and 811 shoulders were included. Clinical outcomes analysed include differences between pre and postoperative ranges of motion (ROM), Visual Analog Score (VAS) reduction, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores and Constant scores. Patients were grouped by technique: anterior-inferior capsular release (Group 1), anterior-inferior-posterior capsular release (Group 2), and 360-degree capsular release (Group 3) at follow up points 3,6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Comparing ROM, Group 1 had greater early abduction (p<0.01), early (p<0.01) and overall external rotation (p<0.01) than Group 2, as well as greater early flexion (p<0.01), early abduction (p<0.01), early (p<0.01) and overall internal rotation (p<0.01) than Group 3. Group 2 had greater early (p=0.03) and overall flexion (p<0.01) than Group 1, as well as greater early (p<0.01) and overall flexion (p<0.01), early abduction (p<0.01) and early internal rotation (p<0.01) than Group 3. Group 3 had greater overall flexion (p<0.01) than Group 1 and greater overall external rotation (p<0.01) than Group 2. Comparing VAS scores, the less extensive releases saw the greatest significant postoperative reduction. Group 2 had greater mean improvements in postoperative Constant scores than Group 1 (p<0.01) and Group 3 (p<0.01), while SST scores were significantly higher in Group 1 (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that less extensive releases may result in better functional and pain scores. Addition of a posterior release offers increased early internal rotation, which was not sustained over time, but provides early and sustained flexion improvements. A complete 360 release may not provide any further benefit. There were no significant differences in the complication rates amongst the 3 techniques.

LEVEL OF STUDY

II; Meta-analysis and systematic review.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在就特发性冻结肩的标准肩袖间隙松解术之外的最佳扩展关节囊松解程度达成共识。

材料和方法

本系统评价采用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 指南进行。所有报告特发性冻结肩关节囊松解术结果的文章均被纳入。共纳入 18 篇文章,629 例患者,811 个肩关节。分析的临床结果包括术前和术后活动范围 (ROM)、视觉模拟评分 (VAS) 降低、简易肩部测试 (SST) 评分和常数评分的差异。根据技术将患者分组:前下关节囊松解术 (第 1 组)、前下后关节囊松解术 (第 2 组) 和 360 度关节囊松解术 (第 3 组),随访时间为 3、6 和 12 个月。

结果

比较 ROM,第 1 组的早期外展 (p<0.01)、早期 (p<0.01) 和整体外旋 (p<0.01) 均大于第 2 组,以及更大的早期屈曲 (p<0.01)、早期外展 (p<0.01)、早期 (p<0.01) 和整体内旋 (p<0.01) 比第 3 组。第 2 组的早期 (p=0.03) 和整体屈曲 (p<0.01) 大于第 1 组,早期 (p<0.01) 和整体屈曲 (p<0.01)、早期外展 (p<0.01) 和早期内旋 (p<0.01) 大于第 3 组。第 3 组的整体屈曲 (p<0.01) 大于第 1 组,整体外旋 (p<0.01) 大于第 2 组。比较 VAS 评分,松解范围越小,术后的显著降低。第 2 组的术后 Constant 评分改善明显优于第 1 组 (p<0.01) 和第 3 组 (p<0.01),而第 1 组的 SST 评分明显更高 (p<0.01)。

结论

本系统评价和荟萃分析表明,松解范围较小可能会导致更好的功能和疼痛评分。增加后关节囊松解术可增加早期内旋,但其效果不能持续,但可提供早期和持续的屈曲改善。完全 360 度松解术可能没有任何进一步的益处。3 种技术的并发症发生率无显著差异。

研究水平

II;荟萃分析和系统评价。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验