Suppr超能文献

在关节镜下修复大型至巨大肩袖撕裂中,上囊和后囊联合松解与单纯上囊松解的比较

Combination of Superior and Posterior Capsular Release Versus Superior Capsular Release Alone in Arthroscopic Repair of Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

作者信息

Hwang Jung-Taek, Kim Yong-Been, Cho Min-Soo, Seo Su-Jung, Hong Myung Sun

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical College, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Medical College, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Mar 13;12(3):23259671241235916. doi: 10.1177/23259671241235916. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Superior capsular release has been used to reduce tendon tension, especially in arthroscopic repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears. Some clinicians have used a more extensive release of capsules in arthroscopic cuff repair for adequate reduction of torn tendons to footprints.

PURPOSE

To explore the effects of additional posterior capsular release for superior capsular release in arthroscopic repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We compared 26 shoulders that underwent superior and posterior capsular release (group S&P) with 26 shoulders that underwent superior capsular release alone (group S) in arthroscopic repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears between January 23, 2013 and December 2, 2015. The visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and range of motion (ROM) and muscle power were checked preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Follow-up ultrasound was checked at 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

In both groups, the overall mean functional outcomes improved from preoperatively to postoperatively. Patients in group S&P showed more pre- to postoperative improvement than patients in group S with regard to internal rotation ROM (mean difference, 30.0° vs 20.6°;  < .001) and internal rotation power (3.4 vs 1.8 kgf;  = .001). Patients in group S had a higher retear rate on the follow-up ultrasound than patients in group S&P, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (23.1% vs 11.5%, respectively;  = .465).

CONCLUSION

In the current study, patients who underwent superior and posterior capsular release in arthroscopic repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears had greater postoperative improvement in internal rotation ROM and power compared with patients who underwent superior capsular release alone.

摘要

背景

上盂唇松解术已被用于减轻肌腱张力,尤其是在关节镜下修复大型至巨大肩袖撕裂时。一些临床医生在关节镜下肩袖修复术中采用更广泛的关节囊松解,以充分将撕裂的肌腱复位至足迹处。

目的

探讨在关节镜下修复大型至巨大肩袖撕裂时,额外的后关节囊松解对上盂唇松解术效果的影响。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

我们比较了2013年1月23日至2015年12月2日期间,在关节镜下修复大型至巨大肩袖撕裂时,26例接受上盂唇和后关节囊松解术的肩部(S&P组)与26例仅接受上盂唇松解术的肩部(S组)。术前及术后2年检查疼痛视觉模拟量表、美国肩肘外科医生评分、Constant评分、活动范围(ROM)和肌肉力量。术后2年进行随访超声检查。

结果

两组患者的总体平均功能结果均较术前有所改善。S&P组患者在内旋ROM(平均差异,30.0°对20.6°;P<0.001)和内旋力量(3.4对1.8千克力;P = 0.001)方面,术前至术后的改善程度比S组患者更大。S组患者随访超声检查时的再撕裂率高于S&P组患者,但差异无统计学意义(分别为23.1%对11.5%;P = 0.465)。

结论

在本研究中,与仅接受上盂唇松解术的患者相比,在关节镜下修复大型至巨大肩袖撕裂时接受上盂唇和后关节囊松解术的患者,术后内旋ROM和力量的改善更大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/130a/10938623/5f9c4098a058/10.1177_23259671241235916-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验