Suppr超能文献

RICCADSA试验中阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停及持续气道正压通气治疗对急性冠脉综合征心血管结局的影响

Effect of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and CPAP Treatment on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome in the RICCADSA Trial.

作者信息

Peker Yüksel, Thunström Erik, Glantz Helena, Eulenburg Christine

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, TR 34010 Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 15;9(12):4051. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124051.

Abstract

We aimed to address the impact of OSA and its treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In this current analysis of the revascularized ACS subgroup ( = 353) of the Randomized Intervention with CPAP in Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (RICCADSA) trial (Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No: NCT00519597), participants with non-sleepy OSA (apnea-hypopnea-index [AHI] ≥ 15 events/h on a home sleep apnea testing, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] score < 10; = 171) were randomized to CPAP ( = 86) or no-CPAP ( = 85). The sleepy OSA patients (AHI ≥ 15 events/h and ESS ≥ 10) who were offered CPAP, and the ones with no-OSA (AHI < 5 events/h) were included in the observational arm. A post-hoc analysis was done to compare untreated OSA (no-CPAP; = 78) and nonadherent sleepy/non-sleepy OSA ( = 96) with the reference group without OSA ( = 81). The primary endpoint (the first event of repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular mortality) during a median 4.7-year follow-up was evaluated in time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounding factors. The incidence of MACCE did not differ significantly in intention-to-treat population. On-treatment analysis showed a significant risk reduction in those who used CPAP for ≥4 vs. <4 h/day or did not receive treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.81; = 0.03). Compared with the reference group, nonadherent/untreated OSA was associated with an increased cardiovascular risk (adjusted HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.03-3.77; = 0.04). We conclude that OSA is an independent risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ACS. CPAP treatment may reduce this risk, if the device is used at least 4 h/day.

摘要

我们旨在探讨阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)及其持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)的影响。在这项对冠状动脉疾病和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的CPAP随机干预试验(RICCADSA)(试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov;编号:NCT00519597)的血管重建ACS亚组(n = 353)的当前分析中,非嗜睡性OSA患者(家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试中呼吸暂停低通气指数[AHI]≥15次/小时,且爱泼沃斯嗜睡量表[ESS]评分<10;n = 171)被随机分为CPAP组(n = 86)或非CPAP组(n = 85)。接受CPAP治疗的嗜睡性OSA患者(AHI≥15次/小时且ESS≥10)以及无OSA患者(AHI<5次/小时)被纳入观察组。进行了事后分析以比较未治疗的OSA(非CPAP组;n = 78)和不依从的嗜睡/非嗜睡性OSA(n = 96)与无OSA的参照组(n = 81)。在根据混杂因素进行调整的时间依赖性Cox比例风险模型中评估了中位4.7年随访期间的主要终点(再次血管重建、心肌梗死、中风或心血管死亡的首次事件)。意向性治疗人群中MACCE的发生率无显著差异。治疗分析显示,每天使用CPAP≥4小时与<4小时或未接受治疗的患者相比,风险显著降低(调整后风险比[HR] 0.17;95%置信区间[CI] 0.03 - 0.81;P = 0.03)。与参照组相比,不依从/未治疗的OSA与心血管风险增加相关(调整后HR 1.97,95%CI 1.03 - 3.77;P = 0.04)。我们得出结论,OSA是ACS患者不良心血管结局的独立危险因素。如果每天至少使用4小时该设备,CPAP治疗可能会降低这种风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1475/7765306/84ac2170cc0b/jcm-09-04051-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验