Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA.
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec 14;6(13):1701-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
This study sought to compare the effect of high-dose dobutamine (DBT) with that of high-dose isoproterenol (IPN) in eliciting triggers during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.
High-dose IPN is commonly used to elicit triggers during AF ablation. However, it is not available worldwide and, in the United States, its cost per dose has significantly increased. DBT is a similarly nonselective β-agonist and, as such, is a potential alternative.
This was a prospective, randomized 2×2 crossover study of patients undergoing AF ablation. Patients were assigned to receive IPN (20 to 30 μg/min for 10 min) followed by DBT (40 to 50 μg/kg/min for 10 min) or vice versa in a 1:1 fashion. The type, number, and location of triggers as well as heart rate, blood pressure, and side effects were noted.
Fifty patients were included in the study. Both drugs caused a significant increase in heart rate, with a consistently lower peak for DBT. Blood pressure significantly increased with DBT, while there was a significant reduction with IPN, despite phenylephrine support. Atrial arrhythmias induced during DBT were comparable to that induced during IPN. In patients with IPN-inducible outflow tract premature ventricular contractions, a similar effect was noted with DBT. No major complications occurred during either drug challenge.
High-dose DBT is safe and comparable to high-dose IPN in respect of eliciting AF triggers, with the advantage to maintain systemic pressure without the need of additional vasopressor support. This study supports the use of high-dose DBT in electrophysiology laboratories in which IPN is not readily available and for those patients in whom hypotension is a concern.
本研究旨在比较高剂量多巴酚丁胺(DBT)与高剂量异丙肾上腺素(IPN)在诱发心房颤动(AF)消融过程中触发灶的效果。
高剂量 IPN 常用于诱发 AF 消融过程中的触发灶。然而,它并非在全球范围内都可获得,且在美国,其每剂的价格大幅上涨。DBT 是一种类似的非选择性β-激动剂,因此是一种潜在的替代品。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、2×2 交叉研究,纳入了接受 AF 消融的患者。患者被分配接受 IPN(20 至 30μg/min 持续 10min)或 DBT(40 至 50μg/kg/min 持续 10min),以 1:1 的比例进行。记录触发灶的类型、数量和位置以及心率、血压和副作用。
本研究纳入了 50 名患者。两种药物均导致心率显著增加,DBT 的峰值始终较低。DBT 可显著升高血压,而 IPN 则显著降低血压,尽管给予了去氧肾上腺素支持。DBT 诱发的房性心律失常与 IPN 诱发的心律失常相当。在 IPN 可诱发流出道室性期前收缩的患者中,也观察到 DBT 具有相似的效果。在两种药物试验过程中均未发生重大并发症。
高剂量 DBT 安全且与高剂量 IPN 在诱发 AF 触发灶方面相当,其优势在于在无需额外血管加压支持的情况下维持全身血压。本研究支持在 IPN 不易获得的电生理实验室以及低血压成为关注点的患者中使用高剂量 DBT。