Suppr超能文献

评估共享决策过程对门诊成年患者流感疫苗接种率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Assessing the impact of shared decision making processes on influenza vaccination rates in adult patients in outpatient care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany. Electronic address: http://www.allgemeinmedizin.klinikum.uni-muenchen.de.

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2021 Jan 8;39(2):185-196. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.014. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision making (SDM) is a promising approach, to bridge major barriers concerning vaccination by patient education and personal interaction of health care provider (HCP) and patient. SDM affects patient adherence, enhances patient knowledge, decreases decisional conflict and improves trust in the physician in most areas of health care. The shared decision making process (SDM process) is characterised by three key components: patient activation, bi-directional exchange of information and bi-directional deliberation of options.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of SDM processes on influenza vaccination rates in outpatient care patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and ERIC was conducted (2020-02-05). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs, that aimed to improve influenza vaccination rates in adult patients in outpatient care were included. We examined effects of SDM processes on influenza vaccination rates by meta-analysis, and considered the extent of SDM processes in the analysed interventions and possible effect modifiers in subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

We included 21 studies, with interventions including face-to-face sessions, telephone outreach, home visits, Health Care Practitioner (HCP) trainings and supporting educational material. In 12 studies, interventions included all elements of a SDM process. A meta-analysis of 15 studies showed a positive effect on vaccination rates (OR of 1.96 (95% CI: 1.31 to 2.95)). Findings further suggest that interventions are effective across different patients groups and could increase effectiveness when the interaction is facilitated by multidisciplinary teams of HCP in comparison to interventions delivered by individual HCP.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence that SDM processes can be an effective strategy to increase influenza vaccination rates. Further research with more detailed descriptions of SDM implementation modalities is necessary to better understand which components of SDM are most effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42020175555.

摘要

背景

通过医患互动和患者教育来共同决策(SDM)是一种很有前景的方法,可以克服疫苗接种中的主要障碍。SDM 影响患者的遵医行为,提高患者的知识水平,减少决策冲突,并在大多数医疗保健领域增加患者对医生的信任。共同决策过程(SDM 过程)的特点是三个关键组成部分:患者激活、信息的双向交流和选项的双向审议。

目的

评估 SDM 流程对门诊患者流感疫苗接种率的影响。

方法

对 MEDLINE、CENTRAL、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 ERIC 进行了系统的文献检索(2020 年 2 月 5 日)。纳入了旨在提高门诊成年患者流感疫苗接种率的随机对照试验(RCT)和整群 RCT。我们通过荟萃分析来检查 SDM 流程对流感疫苗接种率的影响,并在亚组分析中考虑了分析干预措施中 SDM 流程的程度和可能的效果调节剂。

结果

我们纳入了 21 项研究,干预措施包括面对面会议、电话外展、家访、医疗保健提供者(HCP)培训和支持性教育材料。在 12 项研究中,干预措施包括 SDM 过程的所有要素。对 15 项研究的荟萃分析表明,接种率有积极影响(比值比 1.96(95%可信区间:1.31 至 2.95))。研究结果进一步表明,干预措施在不同的患者群体中都有效,并且当多学科 HCP 团队促进互动时,干预措施的效果可能会增强,而不是由个体 HCP 提供干预措施。

讨论

本系统评价和荟萃分析提供了证据表明,SDM 流程可以成为提高流感疫苗接种率的有效策略。需要进行更多具有详细 SDM 实施方式描述的研究,以更好地了解 SDM 的哪些组成部分最有效。

试验注册

PROSPERO:CRD42020175555。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验