Academic Respiratory Unit Bristol, Westbury on Trym, UK
Academic Respiratory Unit Bristol, Westbury on Trym, UK.
Eur Respir J. 2021 Jun 24;57(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.03375-2020. Print 2021 Jun.
Secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) is traditionally managed with an intercostal chest tube attached to an underwater seal. We investigated whether use of a one-way flutter valve shortened patients' length of stay (LoS).This open-label randomised controlled trial enrolled patients presenting with SSP and randomised to either a chest tube and underwater seal (standard care: SC) or ambulatory care (AC) with a flutter valve. The type of flutter valve used depended on whether at randomisation the patient already had a chest tube in place: in those without a chest tube a pleural vent (PV) was used; in those with a chest tube , an Atrium Pneumostat (AP) valve was attached. The primary end-point was LoS.Between March 2017 and March 2020, 41 patients underwent randomisation: 20 to SC and 21 to AC (13=PV, 8=AP). There was no difference in LoS in the first 30 days following treatment intervention: AC (median=6 days, IQR 14.5) and SC (median=6 days, IQR 13.3). In patients treated with PV there was a high rate of early treatment failure (6/13; 46%), compared to patients receiving SC (3/20; 15%) (p=0.11) Patients treated with AP had no (0/8 0%) early treatment failures and a median LoS of 1.5 days (IQR 23.8).There was no difference in LoS between ambulatory and standard care. Pleural Vents had high rates of treatment failure and should not be used in SSP. Atrium Pneumostats are a safer alternative, with a trend towards lower LoS.
继发性自发性气胸(SSP)传统上采用肋间胸腔引流管加水下密封装置进行治疗。我们研究了使用单向活瓣阀是否可以缩短患者的住院时间(LoS)。这项开放标签随机对照试验纳入了因 SSP 就诊的患者,并将其随机分为胸腔引流管加水下密封组(标准护理:SC)或带活瓣阀的门诊护理组(AC)。所使用的活瓣类型取决于随机分组时患者是否已经放置了胸腔引流管:对于未放置胸腔引流管的患者,使用胸膜通风阀(PV);对于已放置胸腔引流管的患者,使用 Atrium Pneumostat(AP)阀。主要终点是 LoS。2017 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月,41 例患者接受了随机分组:20 例分配至 SC 组,21 例分配至 AC 组(13 例=PV,8 例=AP)。在治疗干预后的前 30 天,LoS 无差异:AC(中位数=6 天,IQR 14.5)和 SC(中位数=6 天,IQR 13.3)。接受 PV 治疗的患者中有 6/13(46%)早期治疗失败率较高,而接受 SC 治疗的患者中仅有 3/20(15%)(p=0.11)。接受 AP 治疗的患者均未(0/8;0%)早期治疗失败,LoS 的中位数为 1.5 天(IQR 23.8)。门诊护理和标准护理的 LoS 无差异。胸膜通风阀的治疗失败率较高,不应用于 SSP。Atrium Pneumostats 是一种更安全的替代方法,具有 LoS 降低的趋势。