• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

潮气量大小和驱动压力水平对肺补体激活的影响:一项针对危重症患者的观察性研究

The effects of tidal volume size and driving pressure levels on pulmonary complement activation: an observational study in critically ill patients.

作者信息

de Beer Friso M, Wieske Luuk, van Mierlo Gerard, Wouters Diana, Zeerleder Sacha, Bos Lieuwe D, Juffermans Nicole P, Schultz Marcus J, van der Poll Tom, Lagrand Wim K, Horn Janneke

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (LEICA), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Dec 18;8(Suppl 1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00356-6.

DOI:10.1186/s40635-020-00356-6
PMID:33336309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7746430/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation can induce or even worsen lung injury, at least in part via overdistension caused by too large volumes or too high pressures. The complement system has been suggested to play a causative role in ventilator-induced lung injury.

AIMS AND METHODS

This was a single-center prospective study investigating associations between pulmonary levels of complement activation products and two ventilator settings, tidal volume (V) and driving pressure (ΔP), in critically ill patients under invasive ventilation. A miniature bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed for determination of pulmonary levels of C5a, C3b/c, and C4b/c. The primary endpoint was the correlation between BAL fluid (BALF) levels of C5a and V and ΔP. Levels of complement activation products were also compared between patients with and without ARDS or with and without pneumonia.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were included. Median time from start of invasive ventilation till BAL was 27 [19 to 34] hours. Median V and ΔP before BAL were 6.7 [IQR 6.1 to 7.6] ml/kg predicted bodyweight (PBW) and 15 [IQR 11 to 18] cm HO, respectively. BALF levels of C5a, C3b/c and C4b/c were neither different between patients with or without ARDS, nor between patients with or without pneumonia. BALF levels of C5a, and also C3b/c and C4b/c, did not correlate with V and ΔP. Median BALF levels of C5a, C3b/c, and C4b/c, and the effects of V and ΔP on those levels, were not different between patients with or without ARDS, and in patients with or without pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of critically ill patients under invasive ventilation, pulmonary levels of complement activation products were independent of the size of V and the level of ΔP. The associations were not different for patients with ARDS or with pneumonia. Pulmonary complement activation does not seem to play a major role in VILI, and not even in lung injury per se, in critically ill patients under invasive ventilation.

摘要

背景

机械通气可诱发甚至加重肺损伤,至少部分是通过过大的潮气量或过高的压力导致的过度膨胀所致。有研究表明补体系统在呼吸机诱发的肺损伤中起致病作用。

目的和方法

这是一项单中心前瞻性研究,旨在调查有创通气的重症患者肺内补体激活产物水平与两种通气设置(潮气量[V]和驱动压力[ΔP])之间的关联。进行微型支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)以测定肺内C5a、C3b/c和C4b/c的水平。主要终点是支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中C5a水平与V和ΔP之间的相关性。还比较了有或无急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)或有或无肺炎患者的补体激活产物水平。

结果

纳入72例患者。从开始有创通气到进行BAL的中位时间为27[19至34]小时。BAL前的中位V和ΔP分别为6.7[四分位间距6.1至7.6]ml/kg预测体重(PBW)和15[四分位间距11至18]cmH₂O。有或无ARDS的患者之间以及有或无肺炎的患者之间,BALF中C5a、C3b/c和C4b/c的水平均无差异。BALF中C5a以及C3b/c和C4b/c的水平与V和ΔP均无相关性。有或无ARDS的患者之间以及有或无肺炎的患者之间,BALF中C5a、C3b/c和C4b/c的中位水平以及V和ΔP对这些水平的影响均无差异。

结论

在这组有创通气的重症患者中,肺内补体激活产物水平与V的大小和ΔP的水平无关。ARDS患者或肺炎患者的相关性无差异。在有创通气的重症患者中,肺补体激活似乎在呼吸机诱发的肺损伤中不起主要作用,甚至在肺损伤本身中也不起主要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c3/7746533/a6f575d7c2d6/40635_2020_356_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c3/7746533/31dc787943ee/40635_2020_356_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c3/7746533/247d118d913d/40635_2020_356_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c3/7746533/a6f575d7c2d6/40635_2020_356_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c3/7746533/31dc787943ee/40635_2020_356_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c3/7746533/247d118d913d/40635_2020_356_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c3/7746533/a6f575d7c2d6/40635_2020_356_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of tidal volume size and driving pressure levels on pulmonary complement activation: an observational study in critically ill patients.潮气量大小和驱动压力水平对肺补体激活的影响:一项针对危重症患者的观察性研究
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Dec 18;8(Suppl 1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00356-6.
2
Mechanical ventilation with high tidal volume induces inflammation in patients without lung disease.高潮气量机械通气可诱发无肺部疾病患者的炎症反应。
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R39. doi: 10.1186/cc8919. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
3
Low tidal volume ventilation alleviates ventilator-induced lung injury by regulating the NLRP3 inflammasome.低潮气量通气通过调节 NLRP3 炎性小体减轻呼吸机所致肺损伤。
Exp Lung Res. 2022 Apr-Aug;48(4-6):168-177. doi: 10.1080/01902148.2022.2104409. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
4
Low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure mechanical ventilation results in increased inflammation and ventilator-associated lung injury in normal lungs.低潮气量和高呼气末正压通气会导致正常肺中的炎症和呼吸机相关性肺损伤增加。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Jun 1;110(6):1652-60. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cfc416. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
5
Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.驱动压与急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的生存。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.
6
Driving Pressure: Defining the Range.驱动压:定义范围。
Respir Care. 2019 Aug;64(8):883-889. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06599. Epub 2019 May 14.
7
Impact of Different Tidal Volume Levels at Low Mechanical Power on Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury in Rats.低机械功率下不同潮气量水平对大鼠呼吸机诱导性肺损伤的影响
Front Physiol. 2018 Apr 4;9:318. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00318. eCollection 2018.
8
The predictive validity for mortality of the driving pressure and the mechanical power of ventilation.驱动压力和通气机械功率对死亡率的预测效度。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Dec 18;8(Suppl 1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00346-8.
9
Data on respiratory variables in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure placed on proportional assist ventilation with load adjustable gain factors (PAV+).关于接受带负荷可调节增益因子的比例辅助通气(PAV+)的急性呼吸衰竭重症患者呼吸变量的数据。
Data Brief. 2016 Jun 7;8:484-93. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.078. eCollection 2016 Sep.
10
Driving pressure and acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients.机械通气患者的驱动压与急性呼吸窘迫综合征。
Respirology. 2019 Feb;24(2):137-145. doi: 10.1111/resp.13394. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Individualized Mechanical power-based ventilation strategy for acute respiratory failure formalized by finite mixture modeling and dynamic treatment regimen.通过有限混合模型和动态治疗方案制定的针对急性呼吸衰竭的个体化基于机械功率的通气策略。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May 24;36:100898. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100898. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Pulmonary complement depositions in autopsy of critically ill patients have no relation with ARDS.重症患者尸检中的肺补体沉积与急性呼吸窘迫综合征无关。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 Jul 25;7(Suppl 1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0237-2.
2
Molecular Mechanisms of Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury.呼吸机相关性肺损伤的分子机制。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 May 20;131(10):1225-1231. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.226840.
3
Association of Driving Pressure With Mortality Among Ventilated Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
有创机械通气患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者驱动压与死亡率的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):300-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002838.
4
Complement activation contributes to ventilator-induced lung injury in rats.补体激活在大鼠呼吸机诱导的肺损伤中起作用。
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;67(6):911-918.
5
Epidemiological characteristics, practice of ventilation, and clinical outcome in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units from 16 countries (PRoVENT): an international, multicentre, prospective study.16 个国家重症监护病房急性呼吸窘迫综合征高危患者的流行病学特征、通气实践和临床转归(PRoVENT):一项国际多中心前瞻性研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Nov;4(11):882-893. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30305-8. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
6
External validation of the APPS, a new and simple outcome prediction score in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.外部验证 APPS 评分,一种新的、简单的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后预测评分。
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0190-0. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
7
Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries.全球 50 个国家重症监护病房急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的流行病学、治疗模式和死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
8
Lung-Protective Ventilation With Low Tidal Volumes and the Occurrence of Pulmonary Complications in Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis.低潮气量肺保护性通气与非急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者肺部并发症的发生:一项系统评价和个体患者数据分析
Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2155-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001189.
9
Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.驱动压与急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的生存。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.
10
Association between tidal volume size, duration of ventilation, and sedation needs in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis.无急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的潮气量大小、通气时间与镇静需求之间的关系:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):950-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3318-4. Epub 2014 May 9.