Suppr超能文献

采用随机对照试验设计对一项酒精政策措施进行评估:为何可行?

Evaluation of an alcohol policy measure employing a randomised controlled trial design: Why was it possible?

作者信息

Rossow Ingeborg, Grøtting Maja Weemes

机构信息

Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Drugs, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Mar;40(3):468-471. doi: 10.1111/dar.13230. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

Abstract

Some of the best evidence of effects of control policies on alcohol availability stems from controlled experimental studies in the Nordic state-owned alcohol monopolies. Publications from these studies do not, however, explain the process leading up to the implementation of changes in policy measures under controlled experimental conditions. In September 2020, the Norwegian state alcohol monopoly started the implementation of extended trading hours, employing a randomised controlled trial design. In this commentary, we give an account of the process leading up to this implementation and how the monopoly considered various pro- and contra-arguments in this regard. This case illustrates that willingness to contribute to strengthened scientific evidence on alcohol control policies can be embedded in the social responsibility of a state alcohol monopoly.

摘要

关于控制政策对酒精供应影响的一些最佳证据来自北欧国有酒精垄断企业的对照实验研究。然而,这些研究的出版物并未解释在对照实验条件下政策措施变化实施之前的过程。2020年9月,挪威国家酒精垄断企业开始实施延长营业时间,并采用随机对照试验设计。在这篇评论中,我们阐述了这一实施之前的过程,以及该垄断企业在这方面如何考虑各种支持和反对的论点。这个案例表明,为加强酒精控制政策的科学证据做出贡献的意愿可以体现在国家酒精垄断企业的社会责任中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验