• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝细胞癌在线患者资源的质量分析。

Quality Analysis of Online Patient Resources for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

机构信息

MD Undergraduate Program, University of British Columbia.

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;56(1):64-71. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001477.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001477
PMID:33337639
Abstract

GOAL

This study aims to evaluate the quality of online hepatocellular carcinoma (primary liver cancer) resources by using a validated tool to determine the strengths and limitations of hepatocellular carcinoma Web sites designed for patient education.

BACKGROUND

In recent years, online health information-seeking behavior has become more prevalent. Meanwhile, hepatocellular carcinoma incidence rates have also increased. However, there is currently limited literature assessing the quality of online hepatocellular carcinoma information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The term "hepatocellular carcinoma" was searched using the search engine Google and the meta-search engines Dogpile and Yippy. A validated rating tool was used to assign quality scores to 100 Web sites based on the domains of Web site affiliation, accountability, interactivity, structure and organization, readability, and content quality. Overall quality scores were tallied for all Web sites.

RESULTS

Noncommercial hepatocellular carcinoma Web sites received significantly higher overall quality scores compared with their commercial counterparts. Overall, 30% of the Web sites identified their author(s), 42% cited sources, and 33% were updated within the past 2 years. The majority of Web sites utilized at least 1 interactive feature and 4 structural tools. Average readability was at a grade 11.8 level using the Flesch-Kincaid grading system, which is significantly higher than the recommended grade 6 level. Definition and treatment were the most commonly covered topics, while prevention and prognosis were the least commonly covered.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of online hepatocellular carcinoma information is highly variable. Health care professionals should be aware of its limitations and be proactive in guiding patients to reliable resources.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用经过验证的工具评估在线肝细胞癌(原发性肝癌)资源的质量,以确定专为患者教育设计的肝细胞癌网站的优势和局限性。

背景

近年来,在线健康信息搜索行为变得越来越普遍。同时,肝细胞癌的发病率也有所增加。然而,目前评估在线肝细胞癌信息质量的文献有限。

材料和方法

使用搜索引擎 Google 以及元搜索引擎 Dogpile 和 Yippy 搜索“肝细胞癌”一词。使用经过验证的评分工具,根据网站隶属关系、问责制、交互性、结构和组织、可读性和内容质量等领域,为 100 个网站分配质量评分。为所有网站计算总体质量评分。

结果

与商业网站相比,非商业性肝细胞癌网站的总体质量评分明显更高。总体而言,30%的网站明确了作者,42%的网站引用了来源,33%的网站在过去 2 年内进行了更新。大多数网站至少使用了 1 个交互功能和 4 个结构工具。使用 Flesch-Kincaid 分级系统,平均可读性为 11.8 级,显著高于推荐的 6 级。定义和治疗是最常涵盖的主题,而预防和预后则是最不常涵盖的主题。

结论

在线肝细胞癌信息的质量差异很大。医疗保健专业人员应该意识到其局限性,并积极引导患者寻找可靠的资源。

相似文献

1
Quality Analysis of Online Patient Resources for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌在线患者资源的质量分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;56(1):64-71. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001477.
2
Depression in cancer: quality assessment of online patient education resources.癌症相关抑郁:在线患者教育资源质量评估。
Psychooncology. 2021 Mar;30(3):400-407. doi: 10.1002/pon.5591. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
An Evaluation of the Quality of COVID-19 Internet Resources for Cancer Patients.评估面向癌症患者的 COVID-19 互联网资源的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):763-771. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02182-8. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
4
Hand It to Dr Google: The Quality of Online Information on Ganglion Cysts.向谷歌博士致敬:神经节囊肿在线信息质量。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Jan;17(1):141-147. doi: 10.1177/1558944719895780. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
5
Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.胸廓出口综合征患者在线资源的质量评估
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;85:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.静脉曲张患者互联网资源质量的批判性分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jul;9(4):1017-1024.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.072. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
Quality of Online Information for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌在线信息质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):863-869. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02198-0. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.马尾综合征:评估互联网上患者信息的可读性和质量。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):E645-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000282.
9
Digesting the Contents: an Analysis of Online Colorectal Cancer Education Websites.消化内容:在线结直肠癌教育网站分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Apr;37(2):263-273. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01864-5. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
10
Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Assessment of Content, Quality, and Readability of Available Internet Resources.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术:对现有互联网资源的内容、质量和可读性评估。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Mar;36(3):946-952. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.09.033. Epub 2020 Sep 29.