• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估面向癌症患者的 COVID-19 互联网资源的质量。

An Evaluation of the Quality of COVID-19 Internet Resources for Cancer Patients.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, 317-2194 Health Sciences Mall, MD Undergraduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, Canada.

Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, V5Z 4E6, Canada.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):763-771. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02182-8. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-022-02182-8
PMID:35726079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9208828/
Abstract

Cancer patients may face difficulty evaluating web-based COVID-19 resources in context with their cancer diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate educational resources available for cancer patients seeking online information on COVID-19 and cancer. The term "COVID-19 and Cancer" was searched in Google and metasearch engines Yippy and Dogpile. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the results from the 3 lists were systematically combined for a final ranked list. This list was analyzed using a validated structured rating tool with respect to accountability, interactivity, organization, readability, and content coverage and accuracy. Three hundred ninety-eight websites were identified, and 37 websites were included for analysis. Only 43% of sites disclosed authorship, 24% cited sources, and 32% were updated within 3 months of the search date. Fifty-four percent of websites had high school readability (8.0-12.0), 43% were at university level or above, and no websites demonstrated the recommended reading level for health information for the public (< 6.0). Topics most discussed were special considerations for cancer patients during COVID-19 (84%) and COVID-19 risk factors (73%). Topics least covered were COVID-19 incidence/prevalence (5%) and prognosis (8%). There is some COVID-19 information for cancer patients available online, but quality is variable. Healthcare professionals may direct cancer patients to the most reliable COVID-19 and cancer websites shown in this study and results may be helpful when designing future online health information resources.

摘要

癌症患者在评估与癌症诊断相关的 COVID-19 网络资源时可能会遇到困难。本研究的目的是系统地评估可供癌症患者在线查找 COVID-19 和癌症信息的教育资源。在 Google 和元搜索引擎 Yippy 和 Dogpile 中搜索“COVID-19 和癌症”一词。在应用纳入和排除标准后,从 3 个列表中系统地合并结果,得出最终的排名列表。使用经过验证的结构化评分工具,根据问责制、交互性、组织、可读性以及内容涵盖范围和准确性对该列表进行分析。共确定了 398 个网站,其中 37 个网站被纳入分析。只有 43%的网站披露了作者身份,24%的网站引用了来源,32%的网站在搜索日期的 3 个月内进行了更新。54%的网站具有高中阅读水平(8.0-12.0),43%的网站具有大学或以上水平,没有网站达到为公众提供健康信息的推荐阅读水平(<6.0)。讨论最多的主题是 COVID-19 期间癌症患者的特殊注意事项(84%)和 COVID-19 风险因素(73%)。讨论最少的主题是 COVID-19 的发病率/流行率(5%)和预后(8%)。网上有一些针对癌症患者的 COVID-19 信息,但质量参差不齐。医护人员可以将本研究中显示的最可靠的 COVID-19 和癌症网站推荐给癌症患者,并且在设计未来的在线健康信息资源时,研究结果可能会有所帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/083d/9208828/d764f8bd9fa1/13187_2022_2182_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/083d/9208828/d6225f4af4ff/13187_2022_2182_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/083d/9208828/937693bbf9b8/13187_2022_2182_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/083d/9208828/7bbbda6c2f9e/13187_2022_2182_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/083d/9208828/d764f8bd9fa1/13187_2022_2182_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/083d/9208828/d6225f4af4ff/13187_2022_2182_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/083d/9208828/937693bbf9b8/13187_2022_2182_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/083d/9208828/7bbbda6c2f9e/13187_2022_2182_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/083d/9208828/d764f8bd9fa1/13187_2022_2182_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An Evaluation of the Quality of COVID-19 Internet Resources for Cancer Patients.评估面向癌症患者的 COVID-19 互联网资源的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):763-771. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02182-8. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
2
Depression in cancer: quality assessment of online patient education resources.癌症相关抑郁:在线患者教育资源质量评估。
Psychooncology. 2021 Mar;30(3):400-407. doi: 10.1002/pon.5591. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Digesting the Contents: an Analysis of Online Colorectal Cancer Education Websites.消化内容:在线结直肠癌教育网站分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Apr;37(2):263-273. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01864-5. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Analysis of the quality of meningioma education resources available on the Internet.互联网上脑膜瘤教育资源的质量分析。
Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Nov 30;8(2):129-136. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaa082. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
The Past and Present of Breast Cancer Resources: A Re-evaluation of the Quality of Online Resources After Eight Years.乳腺癌资源的过去与现在:八年后对在线资源质量的重新评估
Cureus. 2022 Aug 17;14(8):e28120. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28120. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Quality of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Resources Available on the Internet.胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)相关网络资源质量评估。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Dec;37(6):1598-1605. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01996-2. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.静脉曲张患者互联网资源质量的批判性分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jul;9(4):1017-1024.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.072. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
8
Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.胰腺癌患者在线资源的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Apr;34(2):223-228. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1290-8.
9
Quality of Online Information for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌在线信息质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):863-869. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02198-0. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
Quality Analysis of Online Patient Resources for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌在线患者资源的质量分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;56(1):64-71. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001477.

引用本文的文献

1
An assessment of the quality and readability level of online content on urinary tract infection treatment in Spanish and English.对西班牙语和英语中关于尿路感染治疗的在线内容的质量和可读性水平的评估。
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jul 30;14(7):1959-1977. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-221. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
The quality of YouTube videos on radiotherapy and prostatectomy for prostate cancer.关于前列腺癌放疗和前列腺切除术的YouTube视频质量。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Feb;18(2):61-66. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8523.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 prevention and treatment information on the internet: a systematic analysis and quality assessment.互联网上的新型冠状病毒肺炎防治信息:系统分析与质量评估
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e040487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040487.
2
Quality of online information for the general public on COVID-19.面向公众的关于新冠病毒的在线信息质量。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Aug 7;103(12):2594-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.001.
3
Digital divide and Internet health information seeking among cancer survivors: A trend analysis from 2011 to 2017.
数字鸿沟与癌症幸存者的互联网健康信息寻求:2011 年至 2017 年的趋势分析。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jan;29(1):61-67. doi: 10.1002/pon.5247. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
4
AN ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THYROID CANCER WEBSITES.甲状腺癌网站质量分析。
Endocr Pract. 2019 Oct;25(10):1003-1011. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0595. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
5
Malignant websites? Analyzing the quality of prostate cancer education web resources.恶性网站?分析前列腺癌教育网络资源的质量。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Oct;12(10):344-350. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5084. Epub 2018 May 28.
6
Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.评估在线胰腺癌患者健康信息的准确性和可读性。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):831-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730.
7
Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting.癌症患者对转移性疾病预后信息沟通的偏好。
J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1721-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.095.
8
How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews.消费者如何在万维网上搜索和评估健康信息?采用焦点小组、可用性测试和深度访谈的定性研究。
BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):573-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573.
9
Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings.网页质量:我们能对其进行衡量吗?我们又发现了什么?探索性研究结果报告。
J Public Health Med. 2000 Jun;22(2):191-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.2.191.
10
Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association.互联网上医学与健康信息网站指南:美国医学协会网站管理原则。美国医学协会。
JAMA. 2000;283(12):1600-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.12.1600.