• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Referential Montage Inadequately Localizes Corticocortical Evoked Potentials in Stereoelectroencephalography.立体脑电图中的参照蒙太奇不能准确定位皮质诱发电位。
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Jul 1;39(5):412-418. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000792. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
2
Effects of depth electrode montage and single-pulse electrical stimulation sites on neuronal responses and effective connectivity.深度电极排列和单脉冲电刺激部位对神经元反应和有效连接的影响。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Dec;131(12):2781-2792. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
3
A systematic exploration of parameters affecting evoked intracranial potentials in patients with epilepsy.系统探究影响癫痫患者诱发性颅内电位的参数。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):1232-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
Dynamic tractography: Integrating cortico-cortical evoked potentials and diffusion imaging.动态轨迹:皮质-皮质诱发电位与弥散成像的整合。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116763. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116763. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
5
Bipolar and Laplacian montages are suitable for high-gamma modulation language mapping with stereoelectroencephalography.双极和拉普拉斯蒙太奇适用于立体脑电图的高伽马调制语言映射。
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 16;15:1380644. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1380644. eCollection 2024.
6
Functional connectivity in the human language system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study.人类语言系统中的功能连接性:一项皮质-皮质诱发电位研究。
Brain. 2004 Oct;127(Pt 10):2316-30. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh246. Epub 2004 Jul 21.
7
The Hippocampus and Amygdala Are Integrators of Neocortical Influence: A CorticoCortical Evoked Potential Study.海马体和杏仁核是新皮层影响的整合者:皮质皮质诱发电位研究。
Brain Connect. 2017 Dec;7(10):648-660. doi: 10.1089/brain.2017.0527.
8
In vivo human hippocampal cingulate connectivity: a corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) study.在体人类海马扣带回连接:皮质皮质诱发电位(CCEPs)研究。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Aug;124(8):1547-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.024. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
9
Quantifying trial-by-trial variability during cortico-cortical evoked potential mapping of epileptogenic tissue.量化癫痫组织皮质皮质诱发电位图的试验间变异性。
Epilepsia. 2023 Apr;64(4):1021-1034. doi: 10.1111/epi.17528. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
10
Overview of EEG Montages and Principles of Localization.脑电电极安置概述和定位原理。
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Sep;36(5):325-329. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000538.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodologies to detect cortico-cortical evoked potentials: a systematic review.检测皮质-皮质诱发电位的方法:一项系统综述。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Sep 1;19:1636115. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1636115. eCollection 2025.
2
Bipolar and Laplacian montages are suitable for high-gamma modulation language mapping with stereoelectroencephalography.双极和拉普拉斯蒙太奇适用于立体脑电图的高伽马调制语言映射。
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 16;15:1380644. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1380644. eCollection 2024.
3
CARLA: Adjusted common average referencing for cortico-cortical evoked potential data.皮层-皮层诱发电位数据的调整共同平均参考。
J Neurosci Methods. 2024 Jul;407:110153. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110153. Epub 2024 May 4.
4
Multisensory flicker modulates widespread brain networks and reduces interictal epileptiform discharges.多感觉闪烁调制广泛的大脑网络,并减少癫痫样放电。
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 11;15(1):3156. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47263-y.
5
Effective connectivity relates seizure outcome to electrode placement in responsive neurostimulation.有效连接性将癫痫发作结果与反应性神经刺激中的电极放置联系起来。
Brain Commun. 2024 Feb 22;6(1):fcae035. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae035. eCollection 2024.

立体脑电图中的参照蒙太奇不能准确定位皮质诱发电位。

The Referential Montage Inadequately Localizes Corticocortical Evoked Potentials in Stereoelectroencephalography.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Emory University and Emory Epilepsy Center, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.

Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology. Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.

出版信息

J Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Jul 1;39(5):412-418. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000792. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000000792
PMID:33337663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10069706/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) resulting from single pulse electrical stimulation are increasingly used to understand seizure networks, as well as normal brain connectivity. However, we observed that when using depth electrodes, traditional measures of CCEPs amplitude using a referential montage can be falsely localizing, often to white matter.

METHODS

We pooled 27 linear electrode arrays targeting the amygdala, hippocampus, or cingulate cortex from eight participants. Using postoperative imaging, we classified contacts as being in gray matter, white matter, or bordering each and measured the amplitude using the root-mean-squared deviation from baseline in a referential, common average, bipolar, or Laplacian montage.

RESULTS

Of 27 electrode contacts, 25 (93%) had a significantly higher mean amplitude when in gray matter than in white matter using a Laplacian montage, which was significantly more than the 12 of 27 electrodes (44%) when using a referential montage ( P = 0.0003, Fisher exact test). The area under the curve for a receiver operating characteristic classifying contacts as gray or white matter was significantly higher for either the Laplacian (0.79) or the bipolar (0.72) montage when compared with either the common average (0.56) or the referential (0.51) montage ( P ≤ 0.005, bootstrap).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the Laplacian and bipolar montages were superior to the common average or referential montage in localizing CCEPs to gray matter. These montages may be more appropriate for interpreting CCEPs when using depth electrodes than the referential montage, which has typically been used in prior studies of CCEPs with subdural grids.

摘要

目的

皮质-皮质诱发电位(CCEPs)来源于单脉冲电刺激,其被越来越多地用于了解癫痫网络以及正常大脑的连接。然而,我们观察到,当使用深部电极时,传统的参考导联记录的 CCEPs 振幅测量值可能会错误定位,通常会定位到白质。

方法

我们汇集了来自 8 名参与者的 27 个线性电极阵列,这些阵列靶向杏仁核、海马体或扣带回皮层。使用术后影像学,我们将电极触点分类为灰质、白质或位于两者之间,并使用参考导联、常规平均导联、双极导联或拉普拉斯导联的基线均方根偏差测量振幅。

结果

在 27 个电极触点中,有 25 个(93%)使用拉普拉斯导联时在灰质中的平均振幅明显高于白质,而使用参考导联时只有 12 个(44%)( P = 0.0003,Fisher 精确检验)。用于将触点分类为灰质或白质的接收器操作特征曲线下面积,对于拉普拉斯(0.79)或双极(0.72)导联均显著高于常规平均(0.56)或参考导联(0.51)( P ≤ 0.005,自举检验)。

结论

与常规平均或参考导联相比,拉普拉斯和双极导联在将 CCEPs 定位于灰质方面均更优。与传统的参考导联相比,这些导联在使用深部电极记录 CCEPs 时可能更适合解释 CCEPs,因为传统的参考导联在以前使用硬膜下网格记录 CCEPs 的研究中通常被使用。