Escola Superior de Saúde do Politécnico de Leiria, Center for Innovative Technology and Health Care. Leiria, Portugal.
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde. Lisboa, Portugal.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Dec 21;73(suppl 5):e20200283. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0283. eCollection 2020.
To identify the available evidence in the scientific literature about the strategies or interventions used to promote hope in people with chronic diseases.
An integrative literature review of literature published between 2009-2019, which was conducted in online browsers/databases: b-On, EBSCO, PubMed, Medline, ISI, SciELO, PsycINFO, Google Scholar. Forty-one studies were found, of which eight met the inclusion criteria.
Most studies used a quantitative approach. There was a predominance of studies from Asia and America, addressing patients with multiple sclerosis, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and cancer. Hope-based interventions were categorized by the hope attributes: experiential process, spiritual/transcendence process, rational thought process, and relational process.
Hope-based interventions, in its essence, are good clinical practices in the physical, psychological, social and spiritual domains. This is congruent with the vision of nursing, first proposed by Florence Nightingale. There seem to be gaps in the literature regarding specific hope promoting interventions.
在科学文献中确定用于促进慢性病患者希望的策略或干预措施的现有证据。
对 2009 年至 2019 年间发表的文献进行综合文献回顾，在在线浏览器/数据库中进行：b-On、EBSCO、PubMed、Medline、ISI、SciELO、PsycINFO、Google Scholar。共发现 41 项研究，其中 8 项符合纳入标准。
大多数研究采用定量方法。亚洲和美洲的研究居多，涉及多发性硬化症、糖尿病、充血性心力衰竭和癌症患者。基于希望的干预措施按希望属性分类：体验过程、精神/超越过程、理性思维过程和关系过程。
基于希望的干预措施本质上是身体、心理、社会和精神领域的良好临床实践。这与弗洛伦斯·南丁格尔首先提出的护理理念一致。关于具体的希望促进干预措施，文献中似乎存在差距。
