Suppr超能文献

在自我采样进行 HPV 检测和在诊所进行标准护理筛查之间做出选择,非裔美国女性会选择什么?一项群组随机对照试验的结果。

Given a choice between self-sampling at home for HPV testing and standard of care screening at the clinic, what do African American women choose? Findings from a group randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, MT 609, 1717 11(th) Ave South, Birmingham, AL 35205, United States of America.

Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, MT 644, 1717 11(th) Ave South, Birmingham, AL 35205, United States of America.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2021 Jan;142:106358. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106358. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

Abstract

The goals of this study were to: (1) evaluate adherence to cervical cancer screening using a patient-centered approach that provided a choice of self-sampling at home for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing or standard of care screening at the local health department ('Choice') versus only standard of care screening at the local health department ('SCS') among un/under-screened African-American women; and (2) examine whether women given a choice were more likely to choose and adhere to self-sampling for HPV testing. We conducted a group randomized trial among un/under-screened African-American women in the Mississippi Delta, with "town" as the unit of randomization (12 towns). Both interventions (i.e., 'Choice' versus 'SCS') were delivered by Community Health Workers (CHWs) through a door-to-door approach. A total of 335 women were enrolled in the study from 2016 to 2019. The 'Choice' arm had a significantly (p = 0.005) higher adherence to screening compared to the 'SCS' arm after adjusting for the cluster effect and other relevant behavioral variables. Participants in the 'Choice' arm were 5.62 (95% CI 1.71-18.44) times more likely to adhere to cervical cancer screening compared to participants in the 'SCS' arm. Women in the 'Choice' arm were significantly more likely to choose (76%) and adhere to self-sampling at home for HPV testing (48% adherence) compared to standard of care screening at the local health department (7.5% adherence). A theory-driven, CHW-led intervention can effectively promote cervical cancer screening among un/under-screened African-American women in a rural setting when women are provided with a choice between two screening modalities. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03713710.

摘要

本研究的目的是

(1)评估通过以患者为中心的方法来提高宫颈癌筛查的依从性,该方法为未/低筛查的非裔美国女性提供了在家自行进行人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测或在当地卫生部门进行标准护理筛查的选择(“选择”),而不是仅在当地卫生部门进行标准护理筛查(“SCS”);(2)检查是否给予女性选择的机会,她们更有可能选择并坚持自行进行 HPV 检测。我们在密西西比三角洲地区的未/低筛查的非裔美国女性中进行了一项群组随机试验,以“城镇”为随机单位(12 个城镇)。两种干预措施(即“选择”与“SCS”)均由社区卫生工作者(CHWs)通过挨家挨户的方式提供。共有 335 名女性于 2016 年至 2019 年参加了该研究。在调整了聚类效应和其他相关行为变量后,与“SCS”组相比,“选择”组的筛查依从性显著更高(p=0.005)。与“SCS”组相比,“选择”组的参与者更有可能坚持宫颈癌筛查,其比值比为 5.62(95%置信区间为 1.71-18.44)。与在当地卫生部门进行标准护理筛查(7.5%的依从率)相比,“选择”组的女性更有可能选择(76%)并坚持在家自行进行 HPV 检测(48%的依从率)。在为女性提供两种筛查方式之间的选择时,基于理论、由 CHW 主导的干预措施可以有效地促进农村地区未/低筛查的非裔美国女性接受宫颈癌筛查。临床试验注册:NCT03713710。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验