Bline Abigail P, Le Goff Anne, Allard Patrick
Molecular Toxicology Interdepartmental Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
UCLA EpiCenter on Epigenetics, Reproduction & Society, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
J Dev Biol. 2020 Dec 16;8(4):35. doi: 10.3390/jdb8040035.
The Weismann barrier has long been regarded as a basic tenet of biology. However, upon close examination of its historical origins and August Weismann's own writings, questions arise as to whether such a status is warranted. As scientific research has advanced, the persistence of the concept of the barrier has left us with the same dichotomies Weismann contended with over 100 years ago: germ or soma, gene or environment, hard or soft inheritance. These dichotomies distract from the more important questions we need to address going forward. In this review, we will examine the theories that have shaped Weismann's thinking, how the concept of the Weismann barrier emerged, and the limitations that it carries. We will contrast the principles underlying the barrier with recent and less recent findings in developmental biology and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance that have profoundly eroded the oppositional view of germline vs. soma. Discarding the barrier allows us to examine the interactive processes and their response to environmental context that generate germ cells in the first place, determine the entirety of what is inherited through them, and set the trajectory for the health status of the progeny they bear.
长期以来,魏斯曼屏障一直被视为生物学的一项基本原则。然而,在仔细审视其历史渊源以及奥古斯特·魏斯曼本人的著作后,人们不禁要问,这样的地位是否合理。随着科学研究的不断推进,屏障概念的持续存在让我们面临着魏斯曼在100多年前所争论的同样二分法:生殖细胞还是体细胞、基因还是环境、硬遗传还是软遗传。这些二分法分散了我们对未来需要解决的更重要问题的注意力。在这篇综述中,我们将审视塑造魏斯曼思想的理论、魏斯曼屏障概念是如何出现的以及它所具有的局限性。我们将把屏障背后的原理与发育生物学和跨代表观遗传继承方面的最新及较早发现进行对比,这些发现已深刻地削弱了生殖系与体细胞的对立观点。摒弃屏障使我们能够审视最初产生生殖细胞的相互作用过程及其对环境背景的反应,确定通过它们所继承的全部内容,并为它们所孕育后代的健康状况设定轨迹。