Suppr超能文献

美国儿童宣传中心相关的结果和产出:范围综述。

Outcomes and outputs affiliated with Children's Advocacy Centers in the United States: A scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA; UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.

College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jan;111:104828. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104828. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Children's Advocacy Center (CAC) model is the predominant multidisciplinary model that responds to child sexual abuse (CSA) in the United States (US). While the CAC model has made important contributions in case coordination and referrals for specialty services, little is known about child- or family-oriented outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

Explore the trends and gaps involving outcome and output measures affiliated with CACs in the US.

PARTICIPANTS & SETTING: A scoping review of the literature was conducted on English language articles published between 1985-2019 that involved CACs and children less than 18 years of age.

METHODS

An electronic database search using the terms "Children's Advocacy Center(s)," "Child Advocacy Center(s)," and "CAC(s)" identified titles and abstracts. Data from articles selected for full text review were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team using a mixed methods approach.

RESULTS

Measures of CAC impact frequently focus on service and programmatic outputs with person-centered outcomes left often reported. The most prevalent output measures related to case prosecution and forensic interviews. Person-centered outcomes most commonly emphasized child mental health and caregiver satisfaction. The majority of articles were limited by weak or unspecified study designs.

CONCLUSION

The current literature on CACs suggests that while they are successful in coordinating services and facilitating referrals, little is known about how engagement with CACs impacts short- and long-term outcomes for children and families. Further research beyond cross sectional or quasi-experimental designs is necessary to better understand how variability in CAC structure, function, and resources can be optimized to meet the needs of the diverse communities that they serve. This is especially salient given the national dissemination of the CAC model. Without such additional studies, knowledge will remain limited regarding the enduring impacts of CACs on the lives of those impacted by CSA.

摘要

背景

儿童倡导中心(CAC)模式是美国应对儿童性虐待(CSA)的主要多学科模式。虽然 CAC 模式在案件协调和转介专业服务方面做出了重要贡献,但对于面向儿童或家庭的结果知之甚少。

目的

探讨与美国 CAC 相关的结果和产出措施的趋势和差距。

参与者和设置

对 1985 年至 2019 年间发表的与 CAC 和 18 岁以下儿童有关的英语文章进行了文献范围的综述。

方法

使用“儿童倡导中心”、“儿童倡导中心”和“CAC”等术语对电子数据库进行搜索,确定标题和摘要。从选择进行全文审查的文章中提取数据,由一个多学科团队使用混合方法进行评估。

结果

CAC 影响的衡量标准通常侧重于服务和项目产出,而以个人为中心的结果往往报告不足。最常见的产出措施与案件起诉和法医访谈有关。以个人为中心的结果最常强调儿童的心理健康和照顾者的满意度。大多数文章受到研究设计薄弱或不明确的限制。

结论

目前关于 CAC 的文献表明,虽然它们在协调服务和促进转介方面取得了成功,但对于 CAC 的参与如何影响儿童和家庭的短期和长期结果知之甚少。除了横断面或准实验设计之外,还需要进一步研究,以更好地了解 CAC 的结构、功能和资源的变异性如何能够得到优化,以满足它们所服务的多样化社区的需求。鉴于 CAC 模式在全国范围内的传播,这一点尤其重要。如果没有这些额外的研究,就会限制对 CAC 对受 CSA 影响者生活的持久影响的了解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验