• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习曲线对两家西方高容量中心机器人胃切除术围手术期结局的影响。

The effect of learning curve on perioperative outcomes of robotic gastrectomy in two western high-volume centers.

机构信息

General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2021 Apr;17(2):e2212. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2212. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.2212
PMID:33340239
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To compare outcomes of robotic gastrectomy (RG) performed during the learning curve (P1) with those after its completion (P2).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all consecutive RG patients (n = 92) performed between 2008 and 2018 were included. Primary outcome was conversion rate.

RESULTS

D2 lymphadenectomies were more common in P2 (41, 97.6%) than P1 (41, 82.0%) (p = 0.019). Conversions were 11 (22%) in P1 versus 2 (4.8%) in P2 (p = 0.006). Postoperative morbidity was comparable between the groups. Median hospital stay was significantly shorter in P2. The only factor significantly associated with conversion was P2 (odds ratio = 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.85; p = 0.039). The 5-year overall survival in P1 was 79.6% versus 79.7% in P2 (p = 0.373).

CONCLUSIONS

The learning curve affected operative and postoperative outcomes: during the learning curve, conversion to open surgery was significantly more frequent, the number of D2 was higher and patients were discharged earlier.

摘要

简介

比较机器人胃切除术(RG)在学习曲线(P1)期间和完成后(P2)的结果。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了 2008 年至 2018 年间连续进行的所有 RG 患者(n=92)。主要结果是转化率。

结果

P2 组行 D2 淋巴结清扫术的比例(41 例,97.6%)高于 P1 组(41 例,82.0%)(p=0.019)。P1 组有 11 例(22%)中转开腹,而 P2 组仅有 2 例(4.8%)(p=0.006)。两组术后并发症发生率相当。P2 组的中位住院时间明显缩短。唯一与转化率显著相关的因素是 P2(优势比=0.18;95%置信区间,0.04-0.85;p=0.039)。P1 组的 5 年总生存率为 79.6%,P2 组为 79.7%(p=0.373)。

结论

学习曲线影响手术和术后结果:在学习曲线期间,中转开腹的发生率显著增加,D2 清扫的数量更高,患者出院更早。

相似文献

1
The effect of learning curve on perioperative outcomes of robotic gastrectomy in two western high-volume centers.学习曲线对两家西方高容量中心机器人胃切除术围手术期结局的影响。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Apr;17(2):e2212. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2212. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
2
[Application of robotic and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy to gastric cancer patients with body mass index ≥24 kg/m].机器人辅助及腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术在体重指数≥24kg/m²的胃癌患者中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 25;21(3):318-324.
3
Robotic surgery for gastric cancer in the west: A systematic review and meta-analyses of short-and long-term outcomes.机器人手术治疗胃癌的西方经验:短期和长期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2020 Nov;83:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.055. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
[Comparison of short-term efficacy between robotic and 3D laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].机器人与3D腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治性远端胃切除术的短期疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):350-356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200224-00085.
5
The Learning Curve Study of Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: an Analysis of Outcomes of the First 67 Consecutive Cases at a High-Volume Gastric Center.机器人远端胃切除术的学习曲线研究:对一家高容量胃疾病中心连续67例首例病例的结果分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Apr;27(4):783-785. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05498-4. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
6
Learning curve of robotic distal and total gastrectomy.机器人远端和全胃切除术的学习曲线。
Br J Surg. 2021 Sep 27;108(9):1126-1132. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab152.
7
Effects of the learning curve on operative time and lymph node harvesting during robotic gastrectomy.机器人胃癌根治术中学习曲线对手术时间和淋巴结清扫的影响。
Int J Med Robot. 2023 Oct;19(5):e2522. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2522. Epub 2023 May 1.
8
Surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis compared with three‑dimensional high‑definition laparoscopic gastrectomy.机器人胃癌根治术与三维高清腹腔镜胃癌根治术的手术效果及学习曲线分析:多维分析与三维高清腹腔镜胃癌根治术的比较。
Int J Oncol. 2019 Sep;55(3):733-744. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2019.4851. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
9
Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy.快速且安全地学习机器人胃癌切除术:与腹腔镜胃癌切除术比较的多维度分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;40(10):1346-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
10
Lower rate of conversion using robotic-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopy in completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer.机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术相比,在残胃癌根治性全胃切除术中转换率较低。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):847-852. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06838-3. Epub 2019 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Enlightenment of robotic gastrectomy from 527 patients with gastric cancer in the minimally invasive era: 5 years of optimizing surgical performance in a high-volume center - a retrospective cohort study.微创时代 527 例胃癌患者机器人胃切除术的启示:高容量中心 5 年优化手术绩效的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Sep 1;110(9):5605-5614. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001652.
2
Establishing the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic and Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.腹腔镜和机器人远端胃切除术学习曲线的确立:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2946-2982. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05812-8. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
Differences in the learning curve of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair according to surgeon's robotic experience.
根据外科医生的机器人手术经验,机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术学习曲线的差异。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1123-1129. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02846-4. Epub 2023 Aug 17.