• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 BioFire® COVID-19 测试和 Respiratory Panel 2.1 快速鉴定鼻咽拭子样本中的 SARS-CoV-2。

Evaluation of the BioFire® COVID-19 test and Respiratory Panel 2.1 for rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples.

机构信息

Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Division of Medical Microbiology & Infection Control & Control, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Division of Medical Microbiology & Infection Control & Control, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;99(3):115260. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115260. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115260
PMID:33340934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7654322/
Abstract

The BioFire® COVID-19 Test and Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) are rapid, fully automated assays for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in nasopharyngeal swabs. In the case of the RP2.1, an additional 21 viral and bacterial pathogens can be detected. Both tests have received emergency use authorization from the U.S. Food & Drug Administration and Interim Order authorization from Health Canada for use in clinical laboratories. We evaluated the performance characteristics of these tests in comparison to a laboratory-developed real-time PCR assay targeting the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and E genes. A total of 78 tests were performed using the BioFire COVID-19 Test, including 30 clinical specimens and 48 tests in a limit of detection study; 57 tests were performed using the RP2.1 for evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 detection, including 30 clinical specimens and 27 tests for limit of detection. Results showed 100% concordance between the BioFire assays and the laboratory-developed test for all clinical samples tested, and acceptable performance of both BioFire assays at their stated limits of detection. Conclusively, the BioFire COVID-19 Test and RP2.1 are highly sensitive assays that can be effectively used in the clinical laboratory for rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing.

摘要

BioFire® COVID-19 测试和呼吸道Panel 2.1(RP2.1)是用于检测鼻咽拭子中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的快速、全自动检测方法。在 RP2.1 的情况下,还可以检测到另外 21 种病毒和细菌病原体。这两种检测方法均已获得美国食品药品监督管理局的紧急使用授权和加拿大卫生部的临时授权,可在临床实验室中使用。我们评估了这些测试与针对病毒 RNA 依赖性 RNA 聚合酶和 E 基因的实验室开发的实时 PCR 检测方法的性能特征。使用 BioFire COVID-19 测试共进行了 78 次测试,包括 30 个临床标本和 48 个检测下限研究中的测试;使用 RP2.1 进行了 57 次 SARS-CoV-2 检测评估测试,包括 30 个临床标本和 27 个检测下限测试。结果显示,所有测试的临床样本中,BioFire 检测方法与实验室开发的检测方法完全一致,两种 BioFire 检测方法在其规定的检测限内均具有可接受的性能。总之,BioFire COVID-19 测试和 RP2.1 是高度敏感的检测方法,可以有效地在临床实验室中用于快速 SARS-CoV-2 检测。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the BioFire® COVID-19 test and Respiratory Panel 2.1 for rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples.评估 BioFire® COVID-19 测试和 Respiratory Panel 2.1 快速鉴定鼻咽拭子样本中的 SARS-CoV-2。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;99(3):115260. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115260. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
2
Multicenter Evaluation of the BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples.多中心评估 BioFire 呼吸道 Panel 2.1(RP2.1)检测鼻咽拭子样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 May 18;60(5):e0006622. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00066-22. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Clinical Evaluation of BioFire COVID-19 Test, BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1, and Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays for Sample-to-Answer Detection of SARS-CoV-2.BioFire COVID-19 测试、BioFire 呼吸道Panel 2.1 与 Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒对 SARS-CoV-2 样本至报告结果检测的临床评估
Genes (Basel). 2023 Jan 16;14(1):233. doi: 10.3390/genes14010233.
4
Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2.BioFire(R) 呼吸道Panel 2.1 临床评估及 SARS-CoV-2 的检测。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104538. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
Performance Evaluation of the MatMaCorp COVID-19 2SF Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Nasopharyngeal Swabs.MatMaCorp COVID-19 2SF 检测试剂盒用于检测鼻咽拭子中 SARS-CoV-2 的性能评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0008321. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00083-21. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
6
Performance evaluation of Biofire Film Array Respiratory Panel 2.1 for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a pediatric hospital setting.在儿科医院环境中评估 Biofire FilmArray 呼吸道Panel 2.1 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的性能。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292314. eCollection 2023.
7
Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx RP2.0 and the BioFire FilmArray RP2.1 for the Rapid Detection of Respiratory Pathogens Including SARS-CoV-2.评估QIAstat-Dx RP2.0和BioFire FilmArray RP2.1用于快速检测包括严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)在内的呼吸道病原体。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 24;13:854209. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.854209. eCollection 2022.
8
Performance Evaluation of the PowerChek SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A & B Multiplex Real-Time PCR Kit in Comparison with the BioFire Respiratory Panel.PowerChek SARS-CoV-2、流感 A&B 多重实时 PCR 试剂盒与 BioFire 呼吸道Panel 的性能评估比较
Ann Lab Med. 2022 Jul 1;42(4):473-477. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.473.
9
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中,自我采集唾液与鼻咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的诊断性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
10
Analysis of a persistent viral shedding patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR, FilmArray Respiratory Panel v2.1, and antigen detection.采用 RT-qPCR、FilmArray 呼吸道Panel v2.1 和抗原检测对持续性病毒脱落感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者进行分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Feb;27(2):406-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Surveillance of Respiratory Pathogens Among Rapid Diagnostic Test-Negative Acute Respiratory Infection Patients in Myanmar in 2023, with a Focus on Rhinovirus and Enterovirus Genotyping.2023年缅甸快速诊断检测结果为阴性的急性呼吸道感染患者呼吸道病原体监测,重点关注鼻病毒和肠道病毒基因分型
Viruses. 2025 Jun 17;17(6):860. doi: 10.3390/v17060860.
2
Recent advances of nanotechnology in COVID 19: A critical review and future perspective.纳米技术在新型冠状病毒肺炎中的最新进展:批判性综述与未来展望
OpenNano. 2023 Jan;9:100118. doi: 10.1016/j.onano.2022.100118. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
3
Incidence and causative agent distribution of viral-induced paediatric asthma exacerbations under strict infection control measures: a single-centre retrospective study in Japan.严格感染控制措施下病毒诱发儿童哮喘加重的发生率和病原体分布:日本单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02779-9.
4
Performance evaluation of Biofire Film Array Respiratory Panel 2.1 for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a pediatric hospital setting.在儿科医院环境中评估 Biofire FilmArray 呼吸道Panel 2.1 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的性能。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292314. eCollection 2023.
5
Viral Pneumonia during the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2019-2021 Evoking Needs for SARS-CoV-2 and Additional Vaccinations.2019 - 2021年新冠疫情期间的病毒性肺炎引发了对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)及额外疫苗接种的需求。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Apr 27;11(5):905. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050905.
6
An acute need: precision medicine for acute care surgery.迫切需求:急性护理手术的精准医疗
BJS Open. 2023 Mar 7;7(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad003.
7
Respiratory Virus Infections during the COVID-19 Pandemic Revealed by Multiplex PCR Testing in Japan.日本多重PCR检测揭示的COVID-19大流行期间的呼吸道病毒感染
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 1;11(2):e0416222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04162-22.
8
Clinical Evaluation of BioFire COVID-19 Test, BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1, and Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays for Sample-to-Answer Detection of SARS-CoV-2.BioFire COVID-19 测试、BioFire 呼吸道Panel 2.1 与 Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒对 SARS-CoV-2 样本至报告结果检测的临床评估
Genes (Basel). 2023 Jan 16;14(1):233. doi: 10.3390/genes14010233.
9
CRISPR-Based Diagnostics: Challenges and Potential Solutions toward Point-of-Care Applications.基于 CRISPR 的诊断:迈向即时检测应用的挑战和潜在解决方案。
ACS Synth Biol. 2023 Jan 20;12(1):1-16. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00496. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
10
SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike IgG Antibody and ACE2 Receptor Binding Inhibition Levels among Breakthrough Stage Veteran Patients.突破阶段老年患者的 SARS-CoV-2 刺突 IgG 抗体和 ACE2 受体结合抑制水平。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0274722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02747-22. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19.美国传染病学会关于新冠病毒病诊断的指南
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 16. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa760.
2
Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19.新冠病毒脱落和传播的时间动态。
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):672-675. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
3
Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.住院 COVID-19 患者的病毒学评估。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
4
Viral dynamics in mild and severe cases of COVID-19.新冠肺炎轻症和重症病例中的病毒动力学
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):656-657. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30232-2. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Positive RT-PCR Test Results in Patients Recovered From COVID-19.新冠病毒感染者康复后出现 RT-PCR 检测结果阳性。
JAMA. 2020 Apr 21;323(15):1502-1503. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2783.
6
Detectable 2019-nCoV viral RNA in blood is a strong indicator for the further clinical severity.血液中可检测到的 2019-nCoV 病毒 RNA 是进一步临床严重程度的强烈指标。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Feb 26;9(1):469-473. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1732837. eCollection 2020.
7
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.实时 RT-PCR 检测 2019 新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.
8
Multicenter Evaluation of BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 for Detection of Viruses and Bacteria in Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples.多中心评价生物梅里埃 FilmArray 呼吸道Panel 2 检测鼻咽拭子样本中病毒和细菌
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 May 25;56(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01945-17. Print 2018 Jun.