Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2021 Feb;62(2):155-164. doi: 10.1002/em.22420. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
Considering the importance and lack of data of toxicogenomic approaches on occupational exposure to anesthetics, we evaluated possible associations between waste anesthetic gases (WAGs) exposure and biological effects including oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammation, and transcriptional modulation. The exposed group was constituted by anesthesia providers who were mainly exposed to the anesthetics sevoflurane and isoflurane (10 ppm) and to a lesser degree to nitrous oxide (150 ppm), and the control group was constituted by physicians who had no exposure to WAGs. The oxidative stress markers included oxidized DNA bases (comet assay), malondialdehyde (high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC]), nitric oxide metabolites (ozone-chemiluminescence), and antioxidative markers, including individual antioxidants (HPLC) and antioxidant defense marker (ferric reducing antioxidant power by spectrophotometry). The inflammatory markers included high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (chemiluminescent immunoassay) and the proinflammatory interleukins IL-6, IL-8 and IL-17A (flow cytometry). Telomere length and gene expression related to DNA repair (hOGG1 and XRCC1), antioxidant defense (NRF2) and inflammation (IL6, IL8 and IL17A) were evaluated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. No significant differences (p > .0025) between the groups were observed for any parameter evaluated. Thus, under the conditions of the study, the findings suggest that occupational exposure to WAGs is not associated with oxidative stress or inflammation when evaluated in serum/plasma, with DNA damage evaluated in lymphocytes and leucocytes or with molecular modulation assessed in peripheral blood cells in university anesthesia providers. However, it is prudent to reduce WAGs exposure and to increase biomonitoring of all occupationally exposed professionals.
考虑到毒理基因组学方法在职业性接触麻醉剂方面的重要性和数据缺乏,我们评估了废物麻醉气体(WAGs)暴露与包括氧化应激、DNA 损伤、炎症和转录调节在内的生物学效应之间可能存在的关联。暴露组由主要接触七氟醚和异氟醚(10ppm)且较少接触氧化亚氮(150ppm)的麻醉提供者组成,对照组由未接触 WAGs 的医生组成。氧化应激标志物包括氧化 DNA 碱基(彗星试验)、丙二醛(高效液相色谱法 [HPLC])、一氧化氮代谢物(臭氧化学发光)和抗氧化标志物,包括个体抗氧化剂(HPLC)和抗氧化防御标志物(分光光度法测定铁还原抗氧化能力)。炎症标志物包括高敏 C 反应蛋白(化学发光免疫测定)和促炎细胞因子 IL-6、IL-8 和 IL-17A(流式细胞术)。端粒长度和与 DNA 修复(hOGG1 和 XRCC1)、抗氧化防御(NRF2)和炎症(IL6、IL8 和 IL17A)相关的基因表达通过实时定量聚合酶链反应进行评估。两组之间评估的任何参数均无显著差异(p>.0025)。因此,在研究条件下,研究结果表明,在大学麻醉提供者的血清/血浆中,当评估淋巴细胞和白细胞中的 DNA 损伤或外周血细胞中的分子调节时,职业性接触 WAGs 与氧化应激或炎症无关。然而,谨慎的做法是减少 WAGs 的暴露并增加对所有职业暴露者的生物监测。