Bhalang Kanokporn, Steiger Beat, Lukic Nenad, Zumbrunn Wojczyńska Aleksandra, Hovijitra Ray S, Ettlin Dominik A
Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Psychiatric Services Aargau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Front Neurol. 2020 Dec 3;11:557415. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.557415. eCollection 2020.
Orofacial pain features may negatively influence a person's well-being and vice versa. Some aspects of well-being can be measured with axis II instruments that assess patients' psychosocial and behavioral status. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between pain features and psychosocial variables as indicators of well-being. Seven hundred ninety-nine anonymized datasets collected using the Web-based Interdisciplinary Symptom Evaluation (WISE) of patients reporting to the Interdisciplinary Orofacial Pain Unit, University of Zurich, between March 19, 2017 and May 19, 2019, were analyzed. Pain features including intensity, number of locations, impact, and duration were evaluated. Psychometric measures assessed pain-related catastrophizing and disability, illness perception, distress, anxiety, depression, injustice experience, dysmorphic concerns, and insomnia. Most patients were between 30 and 59 years old (58.3%), female (69.8%), working (66.0%), and experienced pain for more than 6 months (68.5%). Pain intensities were higher in women than men and higher in disabled than working patients. Scores indicating elevated stress and depression were also observed in disabled patients. The sample prevalence rates of clinically relevant axis II instrument scores were as follows: Graded Chronic Pain Scale for the Head (GCPS-H), 27%; Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ4), 21%; PHQ9, 21%; Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), 20%; General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD7), 15%; Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), 15%; Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ), 14%; GCPS for the Body (GCPS-B), 13%; PHQ for Stress (PHQstr), 6%; and Dysmorphic Concern Questionnaire (DCQ), 2%. Noteworthy results of correlation analysis of the clinically relevant axis II scores and pain measures were as follows: the PHQstr had moderate associations (0.34-0.43) with the sum of pain intensity at rest and during function, number of pain locations, and typical pain intensity. The IEQ scores were moderately associated with typical pain intensity at 0.39. The DCQ scores were moderately associated with pain extension at 0.41. Moderate correlations of certain pain and well-being measures were found in patients reporting clinically relevant stress, injustice experience, and dysmorphic concern, all of which reflect impaired well-being. PHQ4 is suitable for routine distress screening in the clinical setting.
口面部疼痛特征可能会对一个人的幸福感产生负面影响,反之亦然。幸福感的某些方面可以通过评估患者心理社会和行为状态的轴II工具来衡量。本研究的目的是调查疼痛特征与作为幸福感指标的心理社会变量之间的关联。对2017年3月19日至2019年5月19日期间向苏黎世大学跨学科口面部疼痛科报告的患者使用基于网络的跨学科症状评估(WISE)收集的799个匿名数据集进行了分析。评估了疼痛特征,包括强度、部位数量、影响和持续时间。心理测量方法评估了与疼痛相关的灾难化和残疾、疾病认知、痛苦、焦虑、抑郁、不公正经历、畸形担忧和失眠。大多数患者年龄在30至59岁之间(58.3%),女性(69.8%),有工作(66.0%),且疼痛持续超过6个月(68.5%)。女性的疼痛强度高于男性,残疾患者的疼痛强度高于有工作的患者。在残疾患者中也观察到表明压力和抑郁升高的得分。临床相关轴II工具得分的样本患病率如下:头部慢性疼痛分级量表(GCPS-H),27%;患者健康问卷4(PHQ4),21%;PHQ9,21%;疼痛灾难化量表(PCS),20%;广泛性焦虑障碍7(GAD7),15%;失眠严重程度指数(ISI),15%;不公正经历问卷(IEQ),14%;身体GCPS(GCPS-B),13%;压力PHQ(PHQstr),6%;以及畸形担忧问卷(DCQ),2%。临床相关轴II得分与疼痛测量的相关分析的值得注意的结果如下:PHQstr与静息和功能时的疼痛强度总和、疼痛部位数量和典型疼痛强度有中度关联(0.34 - 0.43)。IEQ得分与典型疼痛强度的中度关联为0.39。DCQ得分与疼痛范围的中度关联为0.41。在报告有临床相关压力、不公正经历和畸形担忧的患者中发现了某些疼痛和幸福感测量之间的中度相关性,所有这些都反映了幸福感受损。PHQ4适用于临床环境中的常规痛苦筛查。