Knotts J D, Michel Matthias, Odegaard Brian
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 502 Portola Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE, UK.
Neurosci Conscious. 2020 Dec 12;2020(1):niaa025. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaa025. eCollection 2020.
In a recent opinion piece, Abid (2019) criticizes the hypothesis that subjective inflation may partly account for apparent phenomenological richness across the visual field and outside the focus of attention. In response, we address three main issues. First, we maintain that inflation should be interpreted as an intraperceptual-and not post-perceptual-phenomenon. Second, we describe how inflation may differ from filling-in. Finally, we contend that, in general, there is sufficient evidence to tip the scales toward intraperceptual interpretations of visibility and confidence judgments.
在最近的一篇观点文章中，阿比德（2019年）批评了一种假设，即主观膨胀可能部分解释了整个视野以及注意力焦点之外明显的现象学丰富性。作为回应，我们讨论三个主要问题。第一，我们坚持认为膨胀应被解释为一种知觉内现象，而非知觉后现象。第二，我们描述了膨胀可能与填补的不同之处。最后，我们认为，总体而言，有足够的证据使天平倾向于对可见性和置信度判断的知觉内解释。
