Linton Paul
Centre for Applied Vision Research, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
Neurosci Conscious. 2021 Sep 14;2021(2):niab017. doi: 10.1093/nc/niab017. eCollection 2021.
We typically distinguish between V1 as an egocentric perceptual map and the hippocampus as an allocentric cognitive map. In this article, we argue that V1 also functions as a post-perceptual egocentric cognitive map. We argue that three well-documented functions of V1, namely (i) the estimation of distance, (ii) the estimation of size, and (iii) multisensory integration, are better understood as post-perceptual cognitive inferences. This argument has two important implications. First, we argue that V1 must function as the neural correlates of the visual perception/cognition distinction and suggest how this can be accommodated by V1's laminar structure. Second, we use this insight to propose a low-level account of visual consciousness in contrast to mid-level accounts (recurrent processing theory; integrated information theory) and higher-level accounts (higher-order thought; global workspace theory). Detection thresholds have been traditionally used to rule out such an approach, but we explain why it is a mistake to equate visibility (and therefore the presence/absence of visual experience) with detection thresholds.
我们通常将V1区视作以自我为中心的感知图谱,而将海马体视作以他者为中心的认知图谱。在本文中,我们认为V1区也起到了感知后以自我为中心的认知图谱的作用。我们认为,V1区三个有充分文献记载的功能,即(i)距离估计、(ii)大小估计和(iii)多感官整合,最好被理解为感知后的认知推理。这一观点有两个重要含义。首先,我们认为V1区必须作为视觉感知/认知区分的神经关联,并提出V1区的层状结构如何适应这一点。其次,与中级解释(循环处理理论;综合信息理论)和高级解释(高阶思维;全局工作区理论)形成对比,我们利用这一见解提出了一个关于视觉意识的低级解释。传统上,检测阈值被用来排除这种方法,但我们解释了为什么将可见性(以及因此视觉体验的存在/不存在)与检测阈值等同起来是错误的。