Gil Joshua C, Helal Zeinab H, Risatti Guillermo, Hird Sarah M
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America.
Pathobiology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America.
PeerJ. 2020 Dec 2;8:e10424. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10424. eCollection 2020.
Ticks are globally distributed arthropods and a public health concern due to the many human pathogens they carry and transmit, including the causative agent of Lyme disease, . As tick species' ranges increase, so do the number of reported tick related illnesses. The microbiome is a critical part of understanding arthropod biology, and the microbiome of pathogen vectors may provide critical insight into disease transmission and management. Yet we lack a comprehensive understanding of the microbiome of wild ticks, including what effect the presence of multiple tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) has on the microbiome. In this study we chose samples based on life stage (adult or nymph) and which TBPs were present. We used DNA from previously extracted ticks that tested positive for zero, one, two or three common TBPs (). We produced 16S rRNA amplicon data for the whole tick microbiome and compared samples across TBPs status, single vs multiple coinfections, and life stages. Focusing on samples with a single TBP, we found no significant differences in microbiome diversity in ticks that were infected with and ticks with no TBPs. When comparing multiple TBPs, we found no significant difference in both alpha and beta diversity between ticks with a single TBP and ticks with multiple TBPs. Removal of TBPs from the microbiome did not alter alpha or beta diversity results. Life stage significantly correlated to variation in beta diversity and nymphs had higher alpha diversity than adult ticks. , a common tick endosymbiont, was the most abundant genus. This study confirms that the wild tick microbiome is highly influenced by life stage and much less by the presence of human pathogenic bacteria.
蜱是全球分布的节肢动物,由于它们携带和传播多种人类病原体,包括莱姆病的病原体,因此成为公共卫生问题。随着蜱虫物种分布范围的扩大,蜱虫相关疾病的报告数量也在增加。微生物组是理解节肢动物生物学的关键部分,病原体载体的微生物组可能为疾病传播和管理提供关键见解。然而,我们对野生蜱虫的微生物组缺乏全面的了解,包括多种蜱传病原体(TBPs)的存在对微生物组有何影响。在本研究中,我们根据生活阶段(成虫或若虫)以及存在哪些TBPs来选择样本。我们使用了先前提取的蜱虫的DNA,这些蜱虫对零种、一种、两种或三种常见的TBPs检测呈阳性()。我们生成了整个蜱虫微生物组的16S rRNA扩增子数据,并比较了不同TBPs状态、单一感染与多重共感染以及生活阶段的样本。聚焦于单一TBP的样本,我们发现感染了的蜱虫和未感染TBPs的蜱虫在微生物组多样性上没有显著差异。在比较多种TBPs时,我们发现单一TBP的蜱虫和多种TBPs的蜱虫在α多样性和β多样性上均无显著差异。从微生物组中去除TBPs并没有改变α或β多样性结果。生活阶段与β多样性的变化显著相关,若虫的α多样性高于成年蜱虫。,一种常见的蜱虫内共生菌,是最丰富的属。这项研究证实,野生蜱虫的微生物组受生活阶段的影响很大,而受人类致病细菌存在的影响则小得多。