• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心血管磁共振成像的混叠血流信号平面测量法用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度:一项前瞻性初步研究

Aliased Flow Signal Planimetry by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Grading Aortic Stenosis Severity: A Prospective Pilot Study.

作者信息

Mantini Cesare, Khanji Mohammed Y, D'Ugo Emilia, Olivieri Marzia, Caputi Cristiano Giovanni, Bufano Gabriella, Mastrodicasa Domenico, Calvo Garcia Darien, Rotondo Domenico, Candeloro Matteo, Tana Claudio, Cademartiri Filippo, Ionescu Adrian, Caulo Massimo, Gallina Sabina, Ricci Fabrizio

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

Newham University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 18;8:752340. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.752340. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.752340
PMID:34733896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8558301/
Abstract

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard technique for assessing aortic stenosis (AS), with effective orifice area (EOA) recommended for grading severity. EOA is operator-dependent, influenced by a number of pitfalls and requires multiple measurements introducing independent and random sources of error. We tested the diagnostic accuracy and precision of aliased orifice area planimetry (AOA), a new, simple, non-invasive technique for grading of AS severity by low-VENC phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Twenty-two consecutive patients with mild, moderate, or severe AS and six age- and sex-matched healthy controls had TTE and CMR examinations on the same day. We performed analysis of agreement and correlation among (i) AOA; (ii) geometric orifice area (GOA) by direct CMR planimetry; (iii) EOA by TTE-continuity equation; and (iv) the "gold standard" multimodality EOA (EOA) obtained by substituting CMR LVOT area into Doppler continuity equation. There was excellent pairwise positive linear correlation among AOA, EOA, GOA, and EOA ( < 0.001); AOA had the highest correlation with EOA ( = 0.985, < 0.001). There was good agreement between methods, with the lowest bias (0.019) for the comparison between AOA and EOA. AOA yielded excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.997 and 0.998, respectively). Aliased orifice area planimetry by 2D phase contrast imaging is a simple, reproducible, accurate "one-stop shop" CMR method for grading AS, potentially useful when echocardiographic severity assessment is inconclusive or discordant. Larger studies are warranted to confirm and validate these promising preliminary results.

摘要

经胸超声心动图(TTE)是评估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的标准技术,推荐使用有效瓣口面积(EOA)对狭窄严重程度进行分级。EOA依赖于操作者,受多种陷阱影响,并且需要多次测量,从而引入了独立的随机误差源。我们测试了别名瓣口面积平面测量法(AOA)的诊断准确性和精确性,AOA是一种通过低流速编码相位对比心血管磁共振(CMR)成像对AS严重程度进行分级的新的、简单的非侵入性技术。连续22例轻度、中度或重度AS患者以及6例年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者在同一天接受了TTE和CMR检查。我们对以下各项之间的一致性和相关性进行了分析:(i)AOA;(ii)通过直接CMR平面测量法得到的几何瓣口面积(GOA);(iii)通过TTE连续性方程得到的EOA;以及(iv)通过将CMR左心室流出道面积代入多普勒连续性方程得到的“金标准”多模态EOA(EOA)。AOA、EOA、GOA和EOA之间存在极好的两两正线性相关性(<0.001);AOA与EOA的相关性最高(=0.985,<0.001)。各方法之间具有良好的一致性,AOA与EOA比较时偏差最小(0.019)。AOA产生了极好的观察者内和观察者间可靠性(组内相关系数分别为:0.997和0.998)。二维相位对比成像的别名瓣口面积平面测量法是一种用于AS分级的简单、可重复、准确的CMR“一站式”方法,当超声心动图严重程度评估不确定或不一致时可能有用。需要进行更大规模的研究来证实和验证这些有前景的初步结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/221a9b977cdf/fcvm-08-752340-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/4f8e3ebbe11c/fcvm-08-752340-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/bc03acce66c5/fcvm-08-752340-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/3c04301101cd/fcvm-08-752340-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/85914eca66a9/fcvm-08-752340-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/339fbbbcd987/fcvm-08-752340-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/221a9b977cdf/fcvm-08-752340-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/4f8e3ebbe11c/fcvm-08-752340-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/bc03acce66c5/fcvm-08-752340-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/3c04301101cd/fcvm-08-752340-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/85914eca66a9/fcvm-08-752340-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/339fbbbcd987/fcvm-08-752340-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e02c/8558301/221a9b977cdf/fcvm-08-752340-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Aliased Flow Signal Planimetry by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Grading Aortic Stenosis Severity: A Prospective Pilot Study.心血管磁共振成像的混叠血流信号平面测量法用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度:一项前瞻性初步研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 18;8:752340. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.752340. eCollection 2021.
2
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area.采用有效瓣口面积单平面测量法评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的心血管磁共振评价。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Apr 6;14(1):23. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-23.
3
Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.比较心血管磁共振和经胸多普勒超声心动图在主动脉瓣狭窄有效瓣口面积评估中的应用。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Apr 28;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-25.
4
Grading of aortic stenosis severity: a head-to-head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度分级:心脏磁共振成像与超声心动图的头对头比较。
Radiol Med. 2018 Sep;123(9):643-654. doi: 10.1007/s11547-018-0895-2. Epub 2018 May 5.
5
A novel approach to determine aortic valve area with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.应用相位对比心血管磁共振成像技术评估主动脉瓣口面积的新方法。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022 Jan 6;24(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00838-w.
6
Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.应用心血管磁共振评估主动脉瓣狭窄:相位对比心血管磁共振原始半自动分析与多普勒超声心动图的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):604-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.971218. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
7
Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.CMR 对生物瓣主动脉瓣功能的评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul;9(7):785-793. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.025. Epub 2016 May 12.
8
Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.心血管磁共振评估主动脉生物瓣膜瓣口面积的可行性
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Sep;2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.840967. Epub 2009 May 22.
9
Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.通过速度编码相位对比连续性方法获得的主动脉瓣面积与使用心血管磁共振直接平面测量法的相关性。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(5):799-805. doi: 10.1080/10976640701545479.
10
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a complementary method to transthoracic echocardiography for aortic valve area estimation in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心血管磁共振成像作为经胸超声心动图的补充方法用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣面积:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021 Mar-Apr;62(2):107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
2
Management of aortic stenosis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.主动脉瓣狭窄的管理:临床实践指南和建议的系统评价。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 Jul 21;7(4):340-353. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab016.
3
Multimodality Imaging for Discordant Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Assessing the Valve and the Myocardium.
用于不一致性低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄的多模态成像:评估瓣膜和心肌
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 3;7:570689. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.570689. eCollection 2020.
4
Prognostic Significance of Cardiac Amyloidosis in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心脏淀粉样变性在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的预后意义:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;14(1):293-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
5
Usefulness of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Aortic Stenosis.心脏磁共振成像在主动脉瓣狭窄中的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 May;13(5):e010356. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.010356. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
Prevalence and Clinical Relevance of Extracardiac Findings in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging.心血管磁共振成像中心外表现的患病率及临床意义。
J Thorac Imaging. 2019 Jan;34(1):48-55. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000360.
7
Aortic valve bypass surgery in severe aortic valve stenosis: Insights from cardiac and brain magnetic resonance imaging.主动脉瓣旁路手术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄:心脏和脑部磁共振成像的见解。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;156(3):1005-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.158. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
8
Grading of aortic stenosis severity: a head-to-head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度分级:心脏磁共振成像与超声心动图的头对头比较。
Radiol Med. 2018 Sep;123(9):643-654. doi: 10.1007/s11547-018-0895-2. Epub 2018 May 5.
9
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.
10
Distribution of blood flow velocity in the normal aorta: Effect of age and gender.正常主动脉血流速度分布:年龄和性别影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb;47(2):487-498. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25773. Epub 2017 May 26.