Moussa-Tooks Alexandra B, Hetrick William P, Green John T
Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Neurobiol Stress. 2020 Jul 17;13:100242. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100242. eCollection 2020 Nov.
Early life stress paradigms have become prominent in the animal literature to model atypical development. Currently, two models have prevailed within the literature: (1) limited bedding or nesting and (2) maternal separation or deprivation. Both models have produced aberrations spanning behavior and neural circuitry. Surprisingly, these two models have yet to be directly compared. The current study utilized delay eyeblink conditioning, an associative learning task with a well-defined cerebellar circuit, to compare the behavioral effects of standard limited bedding (postnatal day 2-9, n = 15) and maternal separation (60 min per day during postnatal day 2-14, n = 13) early life stress paradigms. Animals in all groups exhibited robust learning curves. Surprisingly, facilitated conditioning was observed in the maternal separation group. Rats that underwent limited bedding did not differ from the control or maternal separation groups on any conditioning measures. This study contributes to a clearer understanding of early life stress paradigms and the claims made about their mechanisms, which if better clarified can be properly leveraged to increase translational value.
早期生活应激范式在动物文献中已变得突出,用于模拟非典型发育。目前,文献中存在两种主要模型:(1)垫料或筑巢受限,以及(2)母婴分离或剥夺。这两种模型均已产生了跨越行为和神经回路的异常。令人惊讶的是,这两种模型尚未进行直接比较。当前的研究利用延迟眨眼条件反射,这是一种具有明确小脑回路的联想学习任务,来比较标准垫料受限(出生后第2 - 9天,n = 15)和母婴分离(出生后第2 - 14天每天60分钟,n = 13)早期生活应激范式的行为效应。所有组的动物均表现出稳健的学习曲线。令人惊讶的是,在母婴分离组中观察到了促进性条件反射。经历垫料受限的大鼠在任何条件反射测量上与对照组或母婴分离组均无差异。这项研究有助于更清楚地理解早期生活应激范式及其关于机制的论断,若能更好地阐明这些,便可合理利用以提高转化价值。