Wylie Scott A, Ally Brandon A, van Wouwe Nelleke C, Neimat Joseph S, van den Wildenberg Wery P M, Bashore Theodore R
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
Department of Psychology/Amsterdam Brain and Cognition (ABC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Sports Act Living. 2019 Oct 30;1:51. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00051. eCollection 2019.
Football is played in a dynamic, often unpredictable, visual environment in which players are challenged to process and respond with speed and flexibility to critical incoming stimulus events. To meet this challenge, we hypothesize that football players possess, in conjunction with their extraordinary physical skills, exceptionally proficient executive cognitive control systems that optimize response execution. It is particularly important for these systems to be proficient at coordinating directional reaction and counter-reaction decisions to the very rapid lateral movements routinely made by their opponents during a game. Despite the importance of this executive skill to successful on-field performance, it has not been studied in football players. To fill this void, we compared the performances of Division I college football players ( = 525) and their non-athlete age counterparts ( = 40) in a motion-based stimulus-response compatibility task that assessed their proficiency at executing either compatible (in the same direction) or incompatible (in the opposite direction) lateralized reactions to a target's lateral motion. We added an element of decision uncertainty and complexity by giving them either sufficient or insufficient time to preload the response decision rule (i.e., compatible vs. incompatible) prior to the target setting in motion. Overall, football players were significantly faster than non-athlete controls in their choice reactions to a target's lateral motion. The reactions of all participants slowed when issuing incompatible counter-reactions to a target's lateral motion. For football players, this cost was reduced substantially compared to controls when given insufficient time to preload the decision rule, indicating that they exerted more efficient executive control over their reactions and counter-reactions when faced with decision uncertainty at the onset of stimulus motion. We consider putative sources of their advantage in reacting to a target's lateral motion and discuss how these findings advance the hypothesis that football players utilize highly-proficient executive control systems to overcome processing conflicts during motor performance.
足球运动是在一个动态的、通常不可预测的视觉环境中进行的,在这个环境中,球员们面临着处理关键传入刺激事件并以速度和灵活性做出反应的挑战。为了应对这一挑战,我们假设足球运动员除了具备非凡的身体技能外,还拥有异常熟练的执行认知控制系统,该系统可优化反应执行。对于这些系统来说,熟练协调定向反应和对比赛中对手常规做出的非常快速的横向移动的反反应决策尤为重要。尽管这种执行技能对场上成功表现很重要,但尚未在足球运动员中进行研究。为了填补这一空白,我们在一项基于动作的刺激-反应兼容性任务中比较了一级大学足球运动员(n = 525)及其非运动员同龄人(n = 40)的表现,该任务评估了他们对目标横向移动执行同向(相同方向)或异向(相反方向)横向反应的熟练程度。我们通过在目标开始移动之前给予他们足够或不足的时间来预加载反应决策规则(即同向与异向),增加了决策的不确定性和复杂性。总体而言,足球运动员对目标横向移动的选择反应明显比非运动员对照组快。当对目标的横向移动做出异向反反应时,所有参与者的反应都会减慢。对于足球运动员来说,当给予不足的时间预加载决策规则时,与对照组相比,这种代价大幅降低,这表明他们在刺激运动开始时面对决策不确定性时,对自己的反应和反反应施加了更有效的执行控制。我们考虑了他们在对目标横向移动做出反应方面优势的假定来源,并讨论了这些发现如何推进足球运动员利用高度熟练的执行控制系统来克服运动表现过程中的处理冲突这一假设。