• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于筛查史的老年宫颈癌女性生存情况。

Survival of Older Women With Cervical Cancer Based on Screening History.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2021 Jan 1;25(1):9-14. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000582.

DOI:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000582
PMID:33347044
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A population-level retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the influence of cervical screening history on the survival from cervical cancer in women 50 years or older.

METHODS

The study included women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer in Ontario, Canada, between 2005 and 2012, who were followed for at least 4 years. Screening history was observed for the 5 years before diagnosis. Health care administrative databases were linked to determine demographic, affiliation with primary care physicians, stage (available 2010-2012), treatment, and survival data. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were carried out to evaluate the impact of cervical screening on overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

There were eligible 1,422 women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer between 2005 and 2012 of whom 566 had been screened within the 5 years before diagnosis. There were 856 women who did not undergo screening within the 5 years before diagnosis. Unscreened women were more likely to present with locally advanced disease (69.3%) compared with the screened women (42.9%). Four-year OS was significantly greater in the screened group (79.9% vs 58.2%). In our univariate analysis, screening was significantly related to survival (hazard ratio = 2.1, p < .01). In our multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, treatment, affiliation with a primary care physician, and income, screening was still significantly associated with improved survival (hazard ratio = 1.5, p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate a survival benefit to screening in women 50 years or older who are diagnosed with cervical cancer. Screening participation must be encouraged in women older than 50 years as rates decline in this age group.

摘要

目的

本研究开展了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,旨在确定宫颈筛查史对 50 岁及以上女性宫颈癌生存的影响。

方法

本研究纳入了 2005 年至 2012 年期间在加拿大安大略省诊断为浸润性宫颈癌的女性患者,这些患者的随访时间至少为 4 年。在诊断前的 5 年内观察筛查史。通过链接医疗保健管理数据库来确定人口统计学、与初级保健医生的关联、分期(2010-2012 年可用)、治疗和生存数据。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析和多变量分析评估宫颈筛查对总生存率(OS)的影响。

结果

在 2005 年至 2012 年期间,符合条件的 1422 名女性被诊断为浸润性宫颈癌,其中 566 名女性在诊断前的 5 年内接受过筛查。856 名女性在诊断前的 5 年内未接受过筛查。未筛查的女性更有可能出现局部晚期疾病(69.3%),而筛查的女性则较少见(42.9%)。筛查组的 4 年 OS 显著更高(79.9%比 58.2%)。在单变量分析中,筛查与生存显著相关(风险比=2.1,p<.01)。在调整年龄、治疗、与初级保健医生的关系和收入后,多变量分析仍显示筛查与生存改善显著相关(风险比=1.5,p<.01)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,50 岁及以上女性在诊断为宫颈癌时进行筛查可获得生存获益。应鼓励 50 岁以上女性进行筛查,因为该年龄段的筛查率正在下降。

相似文献

1
Survival of Older Women With Cervical Cancer Based on Screening History.基于筛查史的老年宫颈癌女性生存情况。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2021 Jan 1;25(1):9-14. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000582.
2
Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening coverage and follow-up of high grade abnormal results in a population-based cohort.与宫颈癌筛查覆盖率及高级别异常结果随访相关的人口统计学因素:基于人群的队列研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jan;128(1):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
3
A population study of screening history and diagnostic outcomes of women with invasive cervical cancer.一项关于浸润性宫颈癌妇女筛查史和诊断结果的人群研究。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jun;10(12):4127-4137. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3951. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Invasive cervical cancer and screening: what are the rates of unscreened and underscreened women in the modern era?浸润性宫颈癌与筛查:在现代社会,未筛查和筛查不足的女性的比例是多少?
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011 Apr;15(2):110-3. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181f515a2.
5
Cervical Cancer Screening Access for Women Who Experience Imprisonment in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省被监禁女性的宫颈癌筛查服务可及性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185637. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5637.
6
Association between cervical screening and prevention of invasive cervical cancer in Ontario: a population-based case-control study.安大略省宫颈筛查与浸润性宫颈癌预防之间的关联:一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Jan;25(1):106-11. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000305.
7
Limitations in Correspondence Programs for Cervical Cancer Screening: Who Are the Women We Are Missing?子宫颈癌筛查函授项目的局限性:我们遗漏了哪些女性?
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Oct;41(10):1410-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.034. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
8
Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results.与宫颈癌筛查及异常结果随访相关的社会人口学因素。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Jan;58(1):e22-31.
9
Predictors of low cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省移民妇女中宫颈癌筛查率低的预测因素。
BMC Womens Health. 2011 May 27;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-20.
10
Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case-control study.宫颈筛查对宫颈癌死亡率的影响:利用巢式病例对照研究的特定分期结果进行估计
Br J Cancer. 2016 Oct 25;115(9):1140-1146. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.290. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of E-Health Use on Cancer Screening Mediated Through Cancer Worry and Fatalism: A Cross-Sectional Study of Older Adults.通过癌症担忧和宿命论介导的电子健康使用对癌症筛查的影响:一项针对老年人的横断面研究。
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251355831. doi: 10.1177/10732748251355831. Epub 2025 Jul 6.
2
Mir-615-5p inhibits cervical cancer progression by targeting TMIGD2.Mir-615-5p通过靶向TMIGD2抑制宫颈癌进展。
Hereditas. 2025 Jan 9;162(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41065-024-00363-7.
3
High-grade cervical disease and cervical cancer in women aged 50 years and older compared with younger women: examining prevalence by HIV status in two large prospective cohorts in Botswana.
50 岁及以上女性的高级别宫颈疾病和宫颈癌与年轻女性相比:在博茨瓦纳的两个大型前瞻性队列中按 HIV 状况检查患病率。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 29;14(10):e089375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089375.