• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌干达的权力、政策与堕胎护理

Power, policy and abortion care in Uganda.

作者信息

Kagaha Alexander, Manderson Lenore

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Institute at Brown for Environment and Society, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2021 Mar 26;36(2):187-195. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa136.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czaa136
PMID:33347559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7996642/
Abstract

Unsafe abortion practices remain the major contributor to maternal death in Uganda, impeding the achievement of universal health coverage and quality of maternal health care. Using an ethnographic design and critical discourse analysis, we explored the operations of power in setting maternal healthcare priorities, as evident at the 2018 Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal, Child and Adolescents Health Conference. Observational data were collected of the policy-making activities, processes and events and key informant interviews were conducted with 27 participants. We describe how neoliberal and state governance through the structure and organization of policy-making, epistemic governance and universal concepts of 'high-impact' interventions, results-based financing, cost-effectiveness and accountability converge to suppress the articulation of local conditions associated with unsafe and risky abortion. By defining maternity along the continuum of birth and emphasizing birthing women, priority-setting was directed towards interventions promoting women's normative role as mothers while suppressing unmet abortion care needs. Finally, discursive and communicative materials controlled how women of reproductive age in Uganda managed reproduction.

摘要

不安全堕胎行为仍是乌干达孕产妇死亡的主要原因,阻碍了全民健康覆盖的实现以及孕产妇保健质量。我们采用人种志设计和批判性话语分析方法,探讨了在确定孕产妇保健优先事项时权力的运作情况,这在2018年生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康会议上表现得很明显。我们收集了决策活动、过程和事件的观察数据,并对27名参与者进行了关键信息访谈。我们描述了新自由主义和国家治理如何通过决策的结构和组织、认知治理以及“高影响力”干预措施、基于结果的融资、成本效益和问责制的普遍概念相互融合,从而压制与不安全和有风险堕胎相关的当地情况的表达。通过沿着生育连续体定义孕产并强调分娩妇女,优先事项设定朝着促进妇女作为母亲的规范角色的干预措施倾斜,同时压制未得到满足的堕胎护理需求。最后,话语和交流材料控制着乌干达育龄妇女如何管理生育。

相似文献

1
Power, policy and abortion care in Uganda.乌干达的权力、政策与堕胎护理
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Mar 26;36(2):187-195. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa136.
2
Abortion as agentive action: reproductive agency among young women seeking post-abortion care in Uganda.堕胎作为能动行为:乌干达寻求堕胎后护理的年轻女性的生殖能动性
Cult Health Sex. 2017 Nov;19(11):1286-1300. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1310297. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
3
Reproductive materialism and justice for women with abortion care needs in Uganda.乌干达堕胎护理需求的女性的生殖唯物主义与正义。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec;17(12):3476-3492. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2129722. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Estimating abortion incidence among adolescents and differences in postabortion care by age: a cross-sectional study of postabortion care patients in Uganda.估算青少年堕胎发生率和不同年龄组堕胎后护理差异:乌干达堕胎后护理患者的横断面研究。
Contraception. 2018 Dec;98(6):510-516. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.07.135. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
5
Priority setting for maternal, newborn and child health in Uganda: a qualitative study evaluating actual practice.乌干达母婴和儿童健康优先事项设定:一项评估实际做法的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4170-6.
6
Challenges and opportunities from using abortion harm reduction and value clarification and attitude transformation engagements for safe abortion advocacy in Uganda.在乌干达开展安全堕胎倡导工作时,利用堕胎减少伤害、价值澄清和态度转变的方法所面临的挑战与机遇。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jun 28;20(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01637-5.
7
Accounting for abortion: Accomplishing transnational reproductive governance through post-abortion care in Senegal.堕胎核算:塞内加尔通过堕胎后护理实现跨国生殖治理。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Jun;13(6):662-679. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1301513. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
8
Unintended pregnancy and abortion in Uganda.乌干达的意外怀孕与堕胎情况。
Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst). 2013 Jan(2):1-8.
9
Designing for action: adapting and implementing a community-based newborn care package to affect national change in Uganda.为行动而设计:调整并实施基于社区的新生儿护理方案以推动乌干达的全国性变革。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Mar 31;8:24250. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.24250. eCollection 2015.
10
Gaps in available published data on abortion in Uganda and the missed opportunity to inform policy and practice.乌干达堕胎方面已发表的现有数据存在缺口,且错失了为政策和实践提供信息的机会。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;161(1):1-7. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14588. Epub 2022 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping the journey: enhancing abortion care in Uganda's health systems.绘制旅程:加强乌干达卫生系统中的堕胎护理。
Front Reprod Health. 2025 Jul 11;7:1609662. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1609662. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceptions of women and their partners on postabortion intrauterine contraception: A qualitative study in central Uganda.乌干达中部地区女性及其伴侣对堕胎后宫内避孕的看法:一项定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0316982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316982. eCollection 2025.
3
Politics-evidence conflict in national health policy making in Africa: a scoping review.非洲国家卫生政策制定中的政策-证据冲突:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Apr 15;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01129-3.
4
Beyond political will: unpacking the drivers of (non) health reforms in sub-Saharan Africa.超越政治意愿:剖析撒哈拉以南非洲地区(非)卫生改革的驱动因素
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Dec;7(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010228.
5
Preventing death following unsafe abortion: a case series from urban Uganda.预防不安全堕胎后的死亡:乌干达城市的一系列病例
AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Feb;2(1):100039. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100039.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical technologies and abortion care in Eastern Uganda.乌干达东部的医疗技术与堕胎护理
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;247:112813. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112813. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
Mental health in all policies in contexts of war and conflict.战争与冲突背景下所有政策中的心理健康问题。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Nov;4(11):e547-e548. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30208-7.
3
Discretion, power and the reproduction of inequality in health policy implementation: Practices, discursive styles and classifications of Brazil's community health workers.审慎、权力与卫生政策实施中不平等的再现:巴西社区卫生工作者的实践、话语风格与分类
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Dec;242:112551. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112551. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
4
The impacts of the global gag rule on global health: a scoping review.全球禁言规则对全球健康的影响:一项范围综述。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2019 Aug 29;4:26. doi: 10.1186/s41256-019-0113-3. eCollection 2019.
5
Shaping the abortion policy - competing discourses on the Zambian termination of pregnancy act.塑造堕胎政策 - 赞比亚终止妊娠法案的竞争话语。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 28;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0908-8.
6
Policy, law and post-abortion care services in Kenya.肯尼亚的政策、法律和堕胎后护理服务。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 21;13(9):e0204240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204240. eCollection 2018.
7
The status of provision of post abortion care services for women and girls in Eastern and Southern Africa: a systematic review.东部和南部非洲妇女和女孩堕胎后护理服务的提供状况:一项系统综述
Contraception. 2018 Mar 14. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.03.014.
8
Behind the scenes: International NGOs' influence on reproductive health policy in Malawi and South Sudan.幕后:国际非政府组织对马拉维和南苏丹生殖健康政策的影响。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Apr;14(4):555-569. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1446545. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Minding the gaps: health financing, universal health coverage and gender.关注差距:卫生筹资、全民健康覆盖与性别。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Dec 1;32(suppl_5):v4-v12. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx063.
10
Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010-14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model.全球、区域和次区域不安全人工流产分类,2010-2014 年:贝叶斯层次模型估计。
Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2372-2381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31794-4. Epub 2017 Sep 27.