Suppr超能文献

作为细胞骨架束集的图像强度指标的变异系数。

Coefficient of variation as an image-intensity metric for cytoskeleton bundling.

机构信息

International Research Organization for Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, 2-39-1 Kurokami, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Japan.

Department of Chemical Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Japan Women's University, 2-8-1 Mejirodai, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 21;10(1):22187. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79136-x.

Abstract

The evaluation of cytoskeletal bundling is a fundamental experimental method in the field of cell biology. Although the skewness of the pixel intensity distribution derived from fluorescently-labeled cytoskeletons has been widely used as a metric to evaluate the degree of bundling in digital microscopy images, its versatility has not been fully validated. Here, we applied the coefficient of variation (CV) of intensity values as an alternative metric, and compared its performance with skewness. In synthetic images representing extremely bundled conditions, the CV successfully detected degrees of bundling that could not be distinguished by skewness. On actual microscopy images, CV was better than skewness, especially on variable-angle epifluorescence microscopic images or stimulated emission depletion and confocal microscopy images of very small areas of around 1 μm. When blur or noise was added to synthetic images, CV was found to be robust to blur but deleteriously affected by noise, whereas skewness was robust to noise but deleteriously affected by blur. For confocal images, CV and skewness showed similar sensitivity to noise, possibly because optical blurring is often present in microscopy images. Therefore, in practical use with actual microscopy images, CV may be more appropriate than skewness, unless the image is extremely noisy.

摘要

细胞骨架捆绑的评估是细胞生物学领域的一种基本实验方法。虽然荧光标记的细胞骨架的像素强度分布的偏度已被广泛用作评估数字显微镜图像中捆绑程度的指标,但它的多功能性尚未得到充分验证。在这里,我们应用强度值的变异系数 (CV) 作为替代指标,并将其性能与偏度进行了比较。在表示极度捆绑状态的合成图像中,CV 成功地检测到了偏度无法区分的捆绑程度。在实际显微镜图像上,CV 优于偏度,尤其是在可变角度落射荧光显微镜图像或非常小的区域(约 1μm)的受激发射损耗和共聚焦显微镜图像上。当向合成图像添加模糊或噪声时,发现 CV 对模糊具有鲁棒性,但对噪声具有有害影响,而偏度对噪声具有鲁棒性,但对模糊具有有害影响。对于共聚焦图像,CV 和偏度对噪声的敏感性相似,这可能是因为在显微镜图像中通常存在光学模糊。因此,在实际使用实际显微镜图像时,CV 可能比偏度更合适,除非图像非常嘈杂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f223/7752905/7de344632293/41598_2020_79136_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验