Wegel Eva, Göhler Antonia, Lagerholm B Christoffer, Wainman Alan, Uphoff Stephan, Kaufmann Rainer, Dobbie Ian M
Micron Oxford Advanced Imaging Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom.
Wolfson Imaging Centre Oxford, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom.
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 6;6:27290. doi: 10.1038/srep27290.
Many biological questions require fluorescence microscopy with a resolution beyond the diffraction limit of light. Super-resolution methods such as Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM), STimulated Emission Depletion (STED) microscopy and Single Molecule Localisation Microscopy (SMLM) enable an increase in image resolution beyond the classical diffraction-limit. Here, we compare the individual strengths and weaknesses of each technique by imaging a variety of different subcellular structures in fixed cells. We chose examples ranging from well separated vesicles to densely packed three dimensional filaments. We used quantitative and correlative analyses to assess the performance of SIM, STED and SMLM with the aim of establishing a rough guideline regarding the suitability for typical applications and to highlight pitfalls associated with the different techniques.
许多生物学问题需要分辨率超越光的衍射极限的荧光显微镜。诸如结构照明显微镜(SIM)、受激发射损耗(STED)显微镜和单分子定位显微镜(SMLM)等超分辨率方法能够提高图像分辨率,超越经典的衍射极限。在此,我们通过对固定细胞中各种不同的亚细胞结构进行成像,比较了每种技术的优缺点。我们选择了从分离良好的囊泡到紧密堆积的三维细丝等各种例子。我们使用定量和相关分析来评估SIM、STED和SMLM的性能,目的是建立关于典型应用适用性的大致指导方针,并突出与不同技术相关的陷阱。