Viere Tobias, Amor Ben, Berger Nicolas, Fanous Ruba Dolfing, Arduin Rachel Horta, Keller Regula, Laurent Alexis, Loubet Philippe, Strothmann Philip, Weyand Steffi, Wright Laurie, Sonnemann Guido
Institute for Industrial Ecology (INEC), Pforzheim University, Pforzheim, Germany.
Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory in Life Cycle Assessment and Circular Economy (LIRIDE), Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2021;26(3):511-527. doi: 10.1007/s11367-020-01844-3. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
Scientific Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) literature provides some examples of LCA teaching in higher education, but not a structured overview of LCA teaching contents and related competencies. Hence this paper aims at assessing and highlighting trends in LCA learning outcomes, teaching approaches and developed content used to equip graduates for their future professional practices in sustainability.
Based on a literature review on teaching LCA in higher education and a collaborative consensus building approach through expert group panel discussions, an overview of LCA learning and competency levels with related teaching contents and corresponding workload is developed. The levels are built on the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) and Bloom's taxonomy of learning.
The paper frames five LCA learning and competency levels that differ in terms of study program integration, workload, cognitive domain categories, learning outcomes, and envisioned professional skills. It furthermore provides insights into teaching approaches and content, including software use, related to these levels.
This paper encourages and supports higher educational bodies to implement a minimum of 'life cycle literacy' into students' curriculum across various domains by increasing the availability, visibility and quality of their teaching on life cycle thinking and LCA.
科学的生命周期评估(LCA)文献提供了一些高等教育中LCA教学的示例,但没有对LCA教学内容和相关能力进行结构化概述。因此,本文旨在评估和突出LCA学习成果、教学方法以及为使毕业生具备未来可持续发展专业实践能力而开发的内容的趋势。
基于对高等教育中LCA教学的文献综述以及通过专家组小组讨论形成的协作共识方法,制定了LCA学习和能力水平概述,包括相关教学内容和相应工作量。这些水平基于欧洲学分转换与积累系统(ECTS)和布鲁姆学习分类法构建。
本文构建了五个LCA学习和能力水平,这些水平在学习计划整合、工作量、认知领域类别、学习成果和预期专业技能方面存在差异。此外,还提供了与这些水平相关的教学方法和内容的见解,包括软件使用。
本文鼓励并支持高等教育机构通过提高其生命周期思维和LCA教学的可用性、可见性和质量,在各个领域的学生课程中至少纳入“生命周期素养”。