Suppr超能文献

在高等教育中教授生命周期评估。

Teaching life cycle assessment in higher education.

作者信息

Viere Tobias, Amor Ben, Berger Nicolas, Fanous Ruba Dolfing, Arduin Rachel Horta, Keller Regula, Laurent Alexis, Loubet Philippe, Strothmann Philip, Weyand Steffi, Wright Laurie, Sonnemann Guido

机构信息

Institute for Industrial Ecology (INEC), Pforzheim University, Pforzheim, Germany.

Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory in Life Cycle Assessment and Circular Economy (LIRIDE), Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2021;26(3):511-527. doi: 10.1007/s11367-020-01844-3. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Scientific Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) literature provides some examples of LCA teaching in higher education, but not a structured overview of LCA teaching contents and related competencies. Hence this paper aims at assessing and highlighting trends in LCA learning outcomes, teaching approaches and developed content used to equip graduates for their future professional practices in sustainability.

METHODS

Based on a literature review on teaching LCA in higher education and a collaborative consensus building approach through expert group panel discussions, an overview of LCA learning and competency levels with related teaching contents and corresponding workload is developed. The levels are built on the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) and Bloom's taxonomy of learning.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The paper frames five LCA learning and competency levels that differ in terms of study program integration, workload, cognitive domain categories, learning outcomes, and envisioned professional skills. It furthermore provides insights into teaching approaches and content, including software use, related to these levels.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This paper encourages and supports higher educational bodies to implement a minimum of 'life cycle literacy' into students' curriculum across various domains by increasing the availability, visibility and quality of their teaching on life cycle thinking and LCA.

摘要

目的

科学的生命周期评估(LCA)文献提供了一些高等教育中LCA教学的示例,但没有对LCA教学内容和相关能力进行结构化概述。因此,本文旨在评估和突出LCA学习成果、教学方法以及为使毕业生具备未来可持续发展专业实践能力而开发的内容的趋势。

方法

基于对高等教育中LCA教学的文献综述以及通过专家组小组讨论形成的协作共识方法,制定了LCA学习和能力水平概述,包括相关教学内容和相应工作量。这些水平基于欧洲学分转换与积累系统(ECTS)和布鲁姆学习分类法构建。

结果与讨论

本文构建了五个LCA学习和能力水平,这些水平在学习计划整合、工作量、认知领域类别、学习成果和预期专业技能方面存在差异。此外,还提供了与这些水平相关的教学方法和内容的见解,包括软件使用。

结论与建议

本文鼓励并支持高等教育机构通过提高其生命周期思维和LCA教学的可用性、可见性和质量,在各个领域的学生课程中至少纳入“生命周期素养”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5e9/7744451/1456ab343279/11367_2020_1844_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验