Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria e Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italia.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, Napoli, Italia.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 May;68(3):1345-1352. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13795. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
In this study, the digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was used to quantify circulating bovine papillomavirus (BPV; genus: Deltapapillomavirus) DNA levels in blood samples from 25 clinically normal cows and 15 cows with chronic enzootic haematuria due to papillomavirus-associated bladder tumours. ddPCR detected BPV DNA in 95% of all the samples (i.e. in 24 of the clinically normal cows and 14 of the diseased animals), whereas quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) detected it in only 57.5% of the same blood samples, with percentage differences between ddPCR and qPCR being statistically significant (p-value ≤ .05), according to chi-squared test. Furthermore, ddPCR detected BPV infections by a single genotype and by multiple genotypes in 37% and 63% of the cows, whereas qPCR detected these in 16% and 16%. Of the two assays, ddPCR was the more sensitive and accurate clinical diagnostic tool, allowing the detection of otherwise undetectable BPV genotypes, and consequently, a higher number of BPV co-infections. qPCR failed to detect many BPV co-infections by multiple genotypes. Therefore, ddPCR may be an essential tool for improving diagnostic procedures, allowing the identification of the genotypic distribution of BPV and a better understanding about the territorial divergence, if any, of the BPV prevalence in different areas. No significant differences in the blood viral load estimations were observed between the two animal groups, suggesting that the bloodstream could be a site of primary infection. Finally, as BPV DNA was detected in cows affected by non-invasive urothelial tumours, including papilloma and papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential, the circulating BPVs appeared to be independent of the status of urothelial neoplasms. Therefore, unlike in humans, circulating BPVs cannot be an actual prognostic marker of urothelial tumours in cows.
在这项研究中,采用数字液滴聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)定量检测 25 头临床正常牛和 15 头因乳头瘤病毒相关膀胱肿瘤而患有慢性地方性血尿的牛的血液样本中的循环牛乳头瘤病毒(BPV;属:Delta 乳头瘤病毒)DNA 水平。ddPCR 检测到所有样本中 95%的 BPV DNA(即 24 头临床正常牛和 14 头患病动物),而定量实时 PCR(qPCR)仅在 57.5%的相同血液样本中检测到它,ddPCR 和 qPCR 之间的百分比差异具有统计学意义(p 值≤.05),根据卡方检验。此外,ddPCR 在 37%和 63%的牛中检测到单个基因型和多个基因型的 BPV 感染,而 qPCR 仅在 16%和 16%的牛中检测到。在这两种检测方法中,ddPCR 是更敏感和准确的临床诊断工具,能够检测到否则无法检测到的 BPV 基因型,从而检测到更多的 BPV 合并感染。qPCR 未能检测到许多由多个基因型引起的 BPV 合并感染。因此,ddPCR 可能是改善诊断程序的重要工具,允许识别 BPV 的基因型分布,并更好地了解不同地区 BPV 流行的地域差异(如果有的话)。两组动物的血液病毒载量估计值没有观察到显著差异,这表明血液可能是原发性感染部位。最后,由于在受非侵袭性尿路上皮肿瘤(包括乳头瘤和低恶性潜能的乳头状尿路上皮肿瘤)影响的牛中检测到 BPV DNA,因此循环 BPV 似乎与尿路上皮肿瘤的状态无关。因此,与人类不同,循环 BPV 不能成为牛尿路上皮肿瘤的实际预后标志物。