• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危骨髓增生异常综合征中国际工作组反应标准的验证:代表 MDS 临床研究联盟的报告。

Validation of International Working Group response criteria in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: A report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium.

机构信息

Malignant Hematology Department, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

Kimmel Cancer Center/Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2021 Jan;10(2):447-453. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3608. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.3608
PMID:33350168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7877342/
Abstract

The utility of the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) as a surrogate endpoint for outcomes is unclear. We assessed the validity of the IWG 2006 response criteria in a large cohort of higher-risk MDS patients (pts) treated at centers from the MDS Clinical Research Consortium. The best overall response rate (ORR) by IWG 2006 criteria to first-line therapy among 597 evaluable pts was 38% and include complete response (CR) 16%, marrow CR (mCR) 2%, partial response (PR) 10%, hematological improvement (HI) 10%, stable disease (SD) 33%, and progressive disease (PD) 24%. CR was associated with a better overall survival (OS) compared to all other response groups (P < 0.001). Among 470 pts treated with hypomethylating agent (HMA) as first-line therapy, the overall Response Rate, defined as HI or better was 39%. The median OS from time of best response was 21 mo, 8 mo, 14 mo, 12 mo, 13 mo, and 8 mo for CR, mCR, PR, HI, SD, and PD, respectively (P < 0.001). We validated those results in a separate cohort of 539 higher-risk MDS pts treated at Moffitt Cancer Center who received first-line HMA therapy, particularly addressing the value of mCR and mCR+HI. mCR alone without HI, SD, and PD outcomes were inferior to CR, PR, mCR+HI, and HI. In conclusion, CR by IWG 2006 response criteria can be used as a surrogate endpoint for OS in higher-risk MDS pts. Any response associated with restoration of effective hematopoiesis is associated with better outcome.

摘要

国际工作组(IWG)2006 年骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)反应标准作为结局替代终点的效用尚不清楚。我们评估了该标准在 MDS 临床研究联盟中心治疗的高危 MDS 患者(pts)大型队列中的有效性。597 例可评估 pts 中,按 IWG 2006 标准一线治疗的最佳总体缓解率(ORR)为 38%,包括完全缓解(CR)16%、骨髓完全缓解(mCR)2%、部分缓解(PR)10%、血液学改善(HI)10%、疾病稳定(SD)33%和疾病进展(PD)24%。与所有其他反应组相比,CR 与更好的总生存(OS)相关(P<0.001)。在 470 例接受低甲基化药物(HMA)作为一线治疗的 pts 中,定义为 HI 或更好的总体反应率为 39%。从最佳反应时间开始的中位 OS 分别为 21 个月、8 个月、14 个月、12 个月、13 个月和 8 个月,用于 CR、mCR、PR、HI、SD 和 PD(P<0.001)。我们在 Moffitt 癌症中心接受一线 HMA 治疗的另外 539 例高危 MDS pts 队列中验证了这些结果,特别是解决了 mCR 和 mCR+HI 的价值。没有 HI、SD 和 PD 结果的 mCR 单独,不如 CR、PR、mCR+HI 和 HI。总之,按 IWG 2006 反应标准的 CR 可用作高危 MDS pts OS 的替代终点。任何与有效造血恢复相关的反应都与更好的结果相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13df/7877342/56c243776636/CAM4-10-447-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13df/7877342/fb4978531dc8/CAM4-10-447-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13df/7877342/56c243776636/CAM4-10-447-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13df/7877342/fb4978531dc8/CAM4-10-447-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13df/7877342/56c243776636/CAM4-10-447-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of International Working Group response criteria in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: A report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium.高危骨髓增生异常综合征中国际工作组反应标准的验证:代表 MDS 临床研究联盟的报告。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jan;10(2):447-453. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3608. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
2
Evaluating complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) as a response criterion in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).评估骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)中部分血液学恢复(CRh)作为完全缓解(CR)的反应标准。
Blood Cancer J. 2022 Nov 15;12(11):153. doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00748-9.
3
A phase 1b study of venetoclax and azacitidine combination in patients with relapsed or refractory myelodysplastic syndromes. Venetoclax 与阿扎胞苷联合治疗复发或难治性骨髓增生异常综合征患者的 1b 期研究。
Am J Hematol. 2023 Feb;98(2):272-281. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26771. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
4
Acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 17 abnormalities and long-term outcomes with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.伴有 17 号染色体异常的急性髓系白血病或骨髓增生异常综合征,以及造血干细胞移植与否的长期预后。
Leuk Res. 2020 Aug;95:106402. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2020.106402. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Outcome of patients with low-risk and intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome after hypomethylating agent failure: a report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium.低甲基化药物治疗失败后低危和中危-1骨髓增生异常综合征患者的结局:代表骨髓增生异常综合征临床研究联盟的报告
Cancer. 2015 Mar 15;121(6):876-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29145. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
6
Impact of achievement of complete cytogenetic response on outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with hypomethylating agents.完全细胞遗传学缓解的实现对接受去甲基化药物治疗的骨髓增生异常综合征患者预后的影响。
Am J Hematol. 2017 Apr;92(4):351-358. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24650. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
7
A prospective study of autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation after intensive chemotherapy in myelodysplastic syndromes. Groupe Français des Myélodysplasies. Group Ouest-Est d'étude des Leucémies aiguës myéloïdes.骨髓增生异常综合征强化化疗后自体骨髓或外周血干细胞移植的前瞻性研究。法国骨髓增生异常综合征研究组。急性髓细胞白血病东西方研究组。
Leukemia. 1999 Apr;13(4):524-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401387.
8
Intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and acute myeloid leukemia following MDS.对骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)及继发于MDS的急性髓系白血病患者进行强化化疗,随后进行异基因或自体干细胞移植。
Blood. 2001 Oct 15;98(8):2326-31. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.8.2326.
9
Upfront transplantation may have better outcomes than pretransplant cytoreductive therapy for treating patients with MDS-EB-1 or MDS-EB-2.对于 MDS-EB-1 或 MDS-EB-2 患者, upfront 移植可能比移植前细胞减少治疗有更好的疗效。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Sep 1;149(5):1109-1120. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33608. Epub 2021 May 28.
10
Comparison of Intensive Chemotherapy and Hypomethylating Agents before Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Study of the Myelodysplastic Syndrome Subcommittee of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplant Research.异基因干细胞移植前强化化疗与去甲基化药物治疗晚期骨髓增生异常综合征的比较:欧洲血液与骨髓移植研究慢性恶性肿瘤工作组骨髓增生异常综合征小组委员会的一项研究
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Sep;22(9):1615-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Maintenance Treatment with 5-Azacitidine in Patients with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Ineligible for Intensive Treatment and with Response After Induction Chemotherapy: A Phase II Clinical Trial.5-氮杂胞苷用于不适于强化治疗且诱导化疗后有反应的急性髓细胞白血病患者的维持治疗:一项II期临床试验
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;17(16):2678. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162678.
2
Long-term follow-up and combined Phase 2 results of eprenetapopt and azacitidine in patients with mutant MDS/AML.依普奈妥单抗与阿扎胞苷联合治疗突变型骨髓增生异常综合征/急性髓系白血病患者的长期随访及2期联合研究结果
Hemasphere. 2025 Jul 13;9(7):e70164. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70164. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Phase II Study of Azacitidine Alone or in Combination With Lenalidomide or With Vorinostat in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: North American Intergroup Study SWOG S1117.阿扎胞苷单药或与来那度胺或伏立诺他联合用于高危骨髓增生异常综合征和慢性粒单核细胞白血病的随机II期研究:北美协作组研究SWOG S1117
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2745-2753. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.2510. Epub 2017 May 9.
2
Rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating drugs (ONTIME): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.利戈塞替尼与最佳支持治疗用于低甲基化药物治疗失败的高危骨髓增生异常综合征患者(ONTIME):一项随机、对照、3 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):496-508. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00009-7. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
3
FDA Approval Summary: Ivosidenib for Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome with an IDH1 Mutation.
美国食品药品监督管理局批准摘要:艾伏尼布用于治疗携带异柠檬酸脱氢酶-1(IDH1)突变的复发/难治性骨髓增生异常综合征成年患者。
Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-1005.
4
Prospective performance of the IWG-2023 criteria and IPSS-M in a phase 2 trial of guadecitabine for higher-risk MDS or CMML.在一项关于地西他滨治疗高危骨髓增生异常综合征或慢性粒-单核细胞白血病的2期试验中,IWG-2023标准和IPSS-M的前瞻性表现。
Blood Neoplasia. 2024 Mar 29;1(2):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100008. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Advancing drug development in myelodysplastic syndromes.推动骨髓增生异常综合征的药物研发
Blood Adv. 2025 Mar 11;9(5):1095-1104. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014865.
6
Drug development in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.高危骨髓增生异常综合征的药物研发
Blood Cancer J. 2024 Oct 24;14(1):187. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01171-y.
7
Fetal hemoglobin induction in azacytidine responders enlightens methylation patterns related to blast clearance in higher-risk MDS and CMML.阿扎胞苷应答者的胎儿血红蛋白诱导阐明了与高危 MDS 和 CMML 中原始细胞清除相关的甲基化模式。
Clin Epigenetics. 2024 Jun 15;16(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13148-024-01687-x.
8
Frontline treatment options for higher-risk MDS: can we move past azacitidine?高危 MDS 的一线治疗选择:我们能否超越阿扎胞苷?
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023 Dec 8;2023(1):65-72. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2023000421.
9
Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Fetal Hemoglobin Levels in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Azacitidine: A Single-center Retrospective Study.预处理胎儿血红蛋白水平对接受阿扎胞苷治疗的骨髓增生异常综合征和急性髓系白血病患者的预后价值:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Intern Med. 2024 Mar 15;63(6):781-790. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1216-22. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
10
DNA methyltransferase inhibitor exposure-response: Challenges and opportunities.DNA 甲基转移酶抑制剂暴露-反应:挑战与机遇。
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug;16(8):1309-1322. doi: 10.1111/cts.13548. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
Outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes who achieve stable disease after treatment with hypomethylating agents.接受去甲基化药物治疗后病情稳定的骨髓增生异常综合征患者的预后。
Leuk Res. 2016 Feb;41:43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
4
Current state of prognostication and risk stratification in myelodysplastic syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征的预后评估与风险分层现状
Curr Opin Hematol. 2015 Mar;22(2):146-54. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000110.
5
A multivariate analysis of the relationship between response and survival among patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated within azacitidine or conventional care regimens in the randomized AZA-001 trial.在 AZA-001 随机试验中,接受阿扎胞苷或常规治疗方案治疗的高危骨髓增生异常综合征患者的反应与生存之间的关系的多变量分析。
Haematologica. 2013 Jul;98(7):1067-72. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.074831. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
6
Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes.修订版国际预后积分系统用于骨髓增生异常综合征。
Blood. 2012 Sep 20;120(12):2454-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
7
The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes.世界卫生组织(WHO)髓系肿瘤和急性白血病分类的2008年修订版:基本原理及重要变化
Blood. 2009 Jul 30;114(5):937-51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
8
Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study.阿扎胞苷与传统治疗方案治疗高危骨髓增生异常综合征的疗效比较:一项随机、开放标签的III期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Mar;10(3):223-32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70003-8. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
9
Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia.国际工作组(IWG)骨髓增生异常综合征反应标准的临床应用及修订建议
Blood. 2006 Jul 15;108(2):419-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
10
Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes.一个国际工作组关于标准化骨髓增生异常综合征反应标准的报告。
Blood. 2000 Dec 1;96(12):3671-4.