• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫肿瘤学中的非比例风险:是否需要新视角?

Non-proportional hazards in immuno-oncology: Is an old perspective needed?

机构信息

Advanced Methodology and Data Science, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Pharm Stat. 2021 May;20(3):512-527. doi: 10.1002/pst.2091. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1002/pst.2091
PMID:33350587
Abstract

A fundamental concept in two-arm non-parametric survival analysis is the comparison of observed versus expected numbers of events on one of the treatment arms (the choice of which arm is arbitrary), where the expectation is taken assuming that the true survival curves in the two arms are identical. This concept is at the heart of the counting-process theory that provides a rigorous basis for methods such as the log-rank test. It is natural, therefore, to maintain this perspective when extending the log-rank test to deal with non-proportional hazards, for example, by considering a weighted sum of the "observed - expected" terms, where larger weights are given to time periods where the hazard ratio is expected to favor the experimental treatment. In doing so, however, one may stumble across some rather subtle issues, related to difficulties in the interpretation of hazard ratios, that may lead to strange conclusions. An alternative approach is to view non-parametric survival comparisons as permutation tests. With this perspective, one can easily improve on the efficiency of the log-rank test, while thoroughly controlling the false positive rate. In particular, for the field of immuno-oncology, where researchers often anticipate a delayed treatment effect, sample sizes could be substantially reduced without loss of power.

摘要

在双臂非参数生存分析中,一个基本概念是比较一个治疗臂(任意选择哪个臂)的实际观察到的事件数量与预期数量之间的差异,其中的预期是假设两个臂中的真实生存曲线是相同的。这个概念是计数过程理论的核心,该理论为对数秩检验等方法提供了严格的基础。因此,在将对数秩检验扩展到处理非比例风险时,例如通过考虑“观察到的 - 预期”项的加权和,其中对预计有利于实验治疗的风险比的时间段赋予更大的权重,从保持这种观点是很自然的。然而,这样做可能会遇到一些相当微妙的问题,这些问题与风险比的解释有关,可能会导致奇怪的结论。另一种方法是将非参数生存比较视为置换检验。从这个角度来看,可以轻松地提高对数秩检验的效率,同时彻底控制假阳性率。特别是在免疫肿瘤学领域,研究人员通常预计会有延迟的治疗效果,在不损失效力的情况下,样本量可以大大减少。

相似文献

1
Non-proportional hazards in immuno-oncology: Is an old perspective needed?免疫肿瘤学中的非比例风险:是否需要新视角?
Pharm Stat. 2021 May;20(3):512-527. doi: 10.1002/pst.2091. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
2
Log-Rank Test vs MaxCombo and Difference in Restricted Mean Survival Time Tests for Comparing Survival Under Nonproportional Hazards in Immuno-oncology Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对数秩检验与最大连续检验和受限平均生存时间检验在免疫肿瘤学试验中非比例风险下生存比较的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;8(9):1294-1300. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2666.
3
Robust group sequential designs for trials with survival endpoints and delayed response.用于具有生存终点和延迟反应试验的稳健组序贯设计。
Biom J. 2022 Feb;64(2):343-360. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000169. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
4
Sample size and power for the weighted log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier based tests with allowance for nonproportional hazards.加权对数秩检验和基于 Kaplan-Meier 的检验的样本量和功效,允许非比例风险。
Biometrics. 2020 Sep;76(3):939-950. doi: 10.1111/biom.13196. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
A unified approach to power and sample size determination for log-rank tests under proportional and nonproportional hazards.比例和非比例风险下对数秩检验的功效和样本量确定的统一方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 May;30(5):1211-1234. doi: 10.1177/0962280220988570. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
6
Empirical power comparison of statistical tests in contemporary phase III randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes in oncology.肿瘤学中以时间为事件的当代 III 期随机对照试验中统计检验的经验功效比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;17(6):597-606. doi: 10.1177/1740774520940256. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
Group sequential monitoring based on the maximum of weighted log-rank statistics with the Fleming-Harrington class of weights in oncology clinical trials.基于 Fleming-Harrington 类权重的加权对数秩统计量最大值的组序贯监测在肿瘤学临床试验中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3525-3532. doi: 10.1177/0962280220931560. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
A simulation-free group sequential design with max-combo tests in the presence of non-proportional hazards.存在非比例风险时采用 max-combo 检验的无仿真群组序贯设计。
Pharm Stat. 2021 Jul;20(4):879-897. doi: 10.1002/pst.2116. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
9
Properties of the weighted log-rank test in the design of confirmatory studies with delayed effects.具有延迟效应的验证性研究设计中加权对数秩检验的性质
Pharm Stat. 2019 May;18(3):287-303. doi: 10.1002/pst.1923. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
Introducing a new estimator and test for the weighted all-cause hazard ratio.引入一种新的加权全因风险比估计量和检验方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 11;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0765-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Time-To-Event Analyses in Randomized Controlled Trials Under Non-Proportional Hazards.非比例风险下随机对照试验中事件发生时间分析的统计方法比较
Stat Med. 2025 Feb 28;44(5):e70019. doi: 10.1002/sim.70019.
2
Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation.三期癌症临床试验中比例风险违反:潜在的试验误解来源。
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 15;30(20):4791-4799. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0566.
3
Comparison between asymptotic and re-randomisation tests under non-proportional hazards in a randomised controlled trial using the minimisation method.
最小化法在非比例风险随机对照试验中渐近检验和再随机检验的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02295-2.
4
Dynamic risk prediction of survival in liver cirrhosis: A comparison of landmarking approaches.肝硬化患者生存的动态风险预测: landmarking 方法的比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 5;19(7):e0306328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306328. eCollection 2024.
5
The Inverse Log-Rank Test: A Versatile Procedure for Late Separating Survival Curves.逆对数秩检验:一种用于晚期分离生存曲线的通用方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 11;20(24):7164. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20247164.
6
Quantifying treatment differences in confirmatory trials under non-proportional hazards.在非比例风险下的验证性试验中量化治疗差异。
J Appl Stat. 2020 Sep 3;49(2):466-484. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1815673. eCollection 2022.
7
A modified weighted log-rank test for confirmatory trials with a high proportion of treatment switching.一种用于治疗转换比例较高的确证性试验的修正加权对数秩检验。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):e0259178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259178. eCollection 2021.