Suppr超能文献

密西西比国民警卫队中的致命手段咨询、电缆锁分发和安全枪支储存实践:2018-2020 年的析因随机对照试验。

Lethal Means Counseling, Distribution of Cable Locks, and Safe Firearm Storage Practices Among the Mississippi National Guard: A Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial, 2018-2020.

机构信息

Michael D. Anestis is with the New Jersey Gun Violence Research Center and the Department of Urban-Global Public Health, School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway. Craig J. Bryan and AnnaBelle O. Bryan are with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus. Daniel W. Capron is with the School of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2021 Feb;111(2):309-317. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306019. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

Abstract

To examine whether lethal means counseling and provision of cable locks prompt safe firearm storage relative to control among firearm-owning members of the Mississippi National Guard. This randomized controlled trial utilized a 2 × 2 factorial design (lethal means counseling vs control, provision of cable locks vs no cable locks). Follow-up assessments took place at 3 and 6 months after baseline. Data were collected (n = 232; 87.5% male; mean age = 35.01 years; 77.2% White) from February 2018 through July 2020. Relative to control, lethal means counseling and provision of cable locks resulted in greater adoption of several safe storage methods over time. Lethal means counseling outperformed control (3 months: 55.0% vs 39.0%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.91). Cable locks outperformed control at 3 and 6 months on number of storage methods (1.41 vs 1.11; d = 0.29 and 1.34 vs 1.16; d = 0.15, respectively) and locking devices (59.8% vs 29.9%; OR = 3.49 and 58.4% vs 35.8%; OR = 2.52, respectively) Lethal means counseling and cable locks can result in sustained changes in firearm storage. The military may benefit from lethal means counseling, perhaps administering at point of entry. Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT03375099.

摘要

为了检验在密西西比国民警卫队的持枪成员中,与对照组相比,致命手段咨询和提供电缆锁是否能更有效地促进安全的枪支储存。这项随机对照试验采用了 2×2 析因设计(致命手段咨询与对照组相比,提供电缆锁与不提供电缆锁相比)。随访评估在基线后 3 个月和 6 个月进行。数据于 2018 年 2 月至 2020 年 7 月收集(n=232;87.5%为男性;平均年龄为 35.01 岁;77.2%为白人)。与对照组相比,随着时间的推移,致命手段咨询和提供电缆锁使几种安全储存方法的采用率更高。致命手段咨询优于对照组(3 个月:55.0%比 39.0%;优势比[OR] = 1.91)。电缆锁在 3 个月和 6 个月时在储存方法数量(1.41 比 1.11;d=0.29 和 1.34 比 1.16;d=0.15)和锁定装置(59.8%比 29.9%;OR=3.49 和 58.4%比 35.8%;OR=2.52)方面均优于对照组。致命手段咨询和电缆锁可以导致枪支储存的持续变化。军队可能会从致命手段咨询中受益,也许在入职时就进行咨询。临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT03375099。

相似文献

7
Assessment of Firearm Storage Practices in the US, 2022.2022 年美国枪支存储实践评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231447. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1447.

引用本文的文献

1
Firearm Storage and Firearm Suicide.枪支储存与枪支自杀
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519266. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19266.

本文引用的文献

5
The Association Between Gun Ownership and Statewide Overall Suicide Rates.枪支拥有与全州自杀率之间的关联。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2018 Apr;48(2):204-217. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12346. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验