Withers R T, Bourdon P C, Crockett A
Exercise Physiology Laboratory, School of Education, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park.
Chest. 1988 Jan;93(1):91-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.93.1.91.
Functional residual capacity (FRC), residual volume (RV), vital capacity (VC), and total lung capacity (TLC) were measured in 162 men aged 18.9 to 78.6 years using a multiple breath helium dilution technique. Multiple regression equations were generated to predict these lung parameters from the best weighted combination (p less than or equal to 0.05) of age, mass, standing height, body surface area, sitting height, biacromial breadth, end-tidal chest girth, expanded chest girth, and chest expansion (FRC: R = .748, SEE = 504 ml; RV: R = .725, SEE = 301 ml; VC: R = .808, SEE = 537 ml; TLC: R = .808, SEE = 551 ml; RV/TLC: R = .778, SEE = 4.15 percent). The range of normality was defined as the predicted value +/- the 95 percent confidence interval (two-tailed test). Cross-validation of other FRC, RV, VC, and TLC equations in the literature indicated that they were unsuitable for use with our data.
采用多次呼吸氦稀释技术,对162名年龄在18.9至78.6岁之间的男性进行了功能残气量(FRC)、残气量(RV)、肺活量(VC)和肺总量(TLC)的测量。通过年龄、体重、身高、体表面积、坐高、肩峰间宽、呼气末胸围、吸气末胸围和胸围扩张的最佳加权组合(p≤0.05)生成多元回归方程,以预测这些肺参数(FRC:R = 0.748,标准误 = 504 ml;RV:R = 0.725,标准误 = 301 ml;VC:R = 0.808,标准误 = 537 ml;TLC:R = 0.808,标准误 = 551 ml;RV/TLC:R = 0.778,标准误 = 4.15%)。正常范围定义为预测值±95%置信区间(双侧检验)。对文献中其他FRC、RV、VC和TLC方程的交叉验证表明,它们不适用于我们的数据。