• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开始使用生物制剂前,客观证实哮喘的频率如何?过敏症专家和免疫学家的实践小组的质量评估。

How Frequently Is Asthma Objectively Demonstrated before Starting a Biologic? Quality Assessment of a Group Practice of Allergists and Immunologists.

机构信息

Section of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

Section of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;17(24):9482. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249482.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17249482
PMID:33352823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7766929/
Abstract

Worldwide, asthma-related healthcare cost remains a major burden. Individuals with severe asthma account for 50% of that cost. Although they are expensive, biologics such as anti-IL5 and anti-IgE agents promise cost-effectiveness when judiciously used to decrease asthma-related hospitalization and the debilitating side effects of systemic corticosteroids. Before considering biologics to treat patients with asthma, current guidelines recommend confirmation of asthma and control of comorbid diseases. Diagnostic confirmation of asthma can be challenging among individuals with severe asthma. In this quality assessment study, we determined the frequency of objective asthma confirmation and addressing of comorbidities prior to starting biologics at a group practice of allergists and immunologists. We surveyed our specialty providers to understand habit(s) leading to the observed results. We identified 40 adult patients who started on biologic modifiers for asthma over the past 5 years. Only 58% of these patients had a proper diagnosis of asthma. Providers underutilized several diagnostic methods that may prove useful in confirming asthma diagnosis in this patient population. The factors contributing to poor asthma control were rarely addressed. A sense of urgency to initiate biologics was the primary reason for the observed results. Further interventions are needed to improve asthma diagnosis and management prior to the initiation of biologic therapeutics.

摘要

在全球范围内,与哮喘相关的医疗保健费用仍然是一个主要负担。严重哮喘患者占这些费用的 50%。尽管生物制剂(如抗 IL-5 和抗 IgE 制剂)昂贵,但如果明智地使用以减少与哮喘相关的住院治疗和全身皮质类固醇的致残副作用,它们具有成本效益。在考虑使用生物制剂治疗哮喘患者之前,现行指南建议确认哮喘并控制合并症。在严重哮喘患者中,哮喘的诊断确认可能具有挑战性。在这项质量评估研究中,我们在一组过敏症和免疫学家的实践中,确定了在开始使用生物制剂之前,客观确认哮喘和解决合并症的频率。我们调查了我们的专科医生,以了解导致观察结果的习惯。我们确定了过去 5 年中开始使用生物调节剂治疗哮喘的 40 名成年患者。这些患者中只有 58%有适当的哮喘诊断。提供者很少使用几种可能有助于在该患者人群中确认哮喘诊断的诊断方法。导致哮喘控制不佳的因素很少得到解决。启动生物制剂的紧迫感是观察结果的主要原因。在开始使用生物疗法之前,需要进一步干预以改善哮喘的诊断和管理。

相似文献

1
How Frequently Is Asthma Objectively Demonstrated before Starting a Biologic? Quality Assessment of a Group Practice of Allergists and Immunologists.开始使用生物制剂前,客观证实哮喘的频率如何?过敏症专家和免疫学家的实践小组的质量评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;17(24):9482. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249482.
2
Clinical use of biologics for asthma treatment by allergy specialists: A questionnaire survey.过敏专科医师治疗哮喘的生物制剂临床应用:问卷调查。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Oct;125(4):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.06.041. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
3
Biologic and maintenance systemic corticosteroid therapy among US subspecialist-treated patients with severe asthma.美国哮喘专科治疗患者中重度哮喘的生物制剂和维持性全身皮质类固醇治疗。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Sep;125(3):294-303.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
4
Factors to Consider in Prescribing Asthma Biologic Therapies to Children.儿童哮喘生物疗法处方中需考虑的因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Mar;11(3):693-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.12.038. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
Factors influencing the initiation of biologic therapy in children with severe asthma: Results of the pediatric asthma noninvasive diagnostic approaches (PANDA) study.影响严重哮喘儿童开始生物治疗的因素:儿科哮喘无创诊断方法(PANDA)研究结果。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024 Nov;59(11):2875-2884. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27145. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
6
Cost-effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of biologic therapy for asthma: To biologic or not to biologic?哮喘生物治疗的成本效益和比较效果:用生物制剂还是不用生物制剂?
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Apr;122(4):367-372. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Prospects for new and emerging therapeutics in severe asthma: the role of biologics.严重哮喘中新型和新兴疗法的前景:生物制剂的作用。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2017 Jun;11(6):505-512. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2017.1326821. Epub 2017 May 10.
8
Specialty differences in the management of asthma. A cross-sectional assessment of allergists' patients and generalists' patients in a large HMO.哮喘管理中的专科差异。对一家大型健康维护组织(HMO)中过敏症专科医生的患者和全科医生的患者进行的横断面评估。
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jun 9;157(11):1201-8.
9
Severe asthma and eligibility for biologics in a Brazilian cohort.巴西队列中严重哮喘和生物制剂的适应证。
J Asthma. 2021 Jul;58(7):958-966. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1748049. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
10
The management of severe asthma in 2020.2020 年严重哮喘的管理。
Biochem Pharmacol. 2020 Sep;179:114112. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114112. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Severe Asthma and Biological Therapy: When, Which, and for Whom.重度哮喘与生物治疗:何时、选用何种及适用于何人。
Pulm Ther. 2020 Jun;6(1):47-66. doi: 10.1007/s41030-019-00109-1. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
2
Asthma biologics: Comparing trial designs, patient cohorts and study results.哮喘生物制剂:比较试验设计、患者队列和研究结果。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Jan;124(1):44-56. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.10.016. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
3
Clinical Utility Of The Exhaled Nitric Oxide (NO) Measurement With Portable Devices In The Management Of Allergic Airway Inflammation And Asthma.
便携式设备呼出一氧化氮(NO)测量在过敏性气道炎症和哮喘管理中的临床应用
J Asthma Allergy. 2019 Oct 7;12:331-341. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S190489. eCollection 2019.
4
Evaluating direct costs and productivity losses of patients with asthma receiving GINA 4/5 therapy in the United States.评估美国接受 GINA 4/5 治疗的哮喘患者的直接成本和生产力损失。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Dec;123(6):564-572.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.08.462. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
5
The Projected Economic and Health Burden of Uncontrolled Asthma in the United States.美国未控制哮喘的经济和健康负担预测。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov 1;200(9):1102-1112. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201901-0016OC.
6
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
7
Cost-effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of biologic therapy for asthma: To biologic or not to biologic?哮喘生物治疗的成本效益和比较效果:用生物制剂还是不用生物制剂?
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Apr;122(4):367-372. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
Confounders of severe asthma: diagnoses to consider when asthma symptoms persist despite optimal therapy.重度哮喘的混杂因素:尽管进行了最佳治疗但哮喘症状仍持续时需考虑的诊断
World Allergy Organ J. 2018 Nov 14;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40413-018-0207-2. eCollection 2018.
9
ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: pathophysiology and methodology of indirect airway challenge testing.ERS 技术标准:支气管激发试验——间接气道激发试验的病理生理学和方法学。
Eur Respir J. 2018 Nov 15;52(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01033-2018. Print 2018 Nov.
10
Understanding Asthma Phenotypes, Endotypes, and Mechanisms of Disease.理解哮喘表型、内型和疾病机制。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019 Apr;56(2):219-233. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8712-1.