Reid B J, Weinstein W M, Lewin K J, Haggitt R C, VanDeventer G, DenBesten L, Rubin C E
Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine.
Gastroenterology. 1988 Jan;94(1):81-90. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(88)90613-0.
There is uncertainty regarding the value of endoscopic biopsy surveillance in Barrett's esophagus because, in retrospective studies, some patients with high-grade dysplasia in endoscopic biopsy specimens have had unexpected advanced adenocarcinoma discovered at the time of esophageal resection. We compared the accuracy of preoperative endoscopic biopsy diagnoses with the final pathologic diagnoses in esophagectomy specimens in 4 patients who had both high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma and 4 other patients who had only high-grade dysplasia preoperatively. The histologic lesions in all 8 patients were documented in intact mucosa with no gross evidence of neoplasia by endoscopy. The preoperative diagnoses were defined with an endoscopic biopsy protocol in which specimens were taken with large-channel biopsy forceps at least every 2 cm throughout the length of Barrett's epithelium. Final pathologic diagnoses derived from detailed analysis of the resected specimens confirmed high-grade dysplasia without carcinoma in 4 patients and intramucosal carcinoma in 2 patients. The remaining 2 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of intramucosal carcinoma had focal submucosal invasion by carcinoma in the resected specimens, but no involvement of the muscularis propria or adventitial lymph nodes. Because the natural history of high-grade dysplasia is not known, the decision to operate on patients with this lesion must be carefully weighed and individualized for each patient. Two of our patients who underwent esophageal resection for high-grade dysplasia without cancer died, one immediately postoperatively and the other 9 mo later after a postoperative stroke. Once intramucosal carcinoma is documented, surgery should be considered if the patient is an acceptable operative risk. We conclude that systematic preoperative endoscopic biopsy of intact mucosa in Barrett's esophagus can correctly detect high-grade dysplasia, either alone or in combination with early, treatable adenocarcinoma.
关于巴雷特食管内镜活检监测的价值存在不确定性,因为在回顾性研究中,一些内镜活检标本显示高级别异型增生的患者在食管切除时意外发现了进展期腺癌。我们比较了4例术前既有高级别异型增生又有黏膜内癌的患者以及另外4例术前仅有高级别异型增生的患者的术前内镜活检诊断与食管切除标本最终病理诊断的准确性。所有8例患者的组织学病变均记录于完整黏膜,内镜检查未发现肿瘤的大体证据。术前诊断采用内镜活检方案,即通过大通道活检钳在整个巴雷特上皮长度至少每2 cm取标本。对切除标本的详细分析得出的最终病理诊断证实,4例患者为无癌的高级别异型增生,2例患者为黏膜内癌。其余2例术前诊断为黏膜内癌的患者,切除标本中癌灶有局灶性黏膜下浸润,但未累及固有肌层或外膜淋巴结。由于高级别异型增生的自然病史尚不清楚,对患有这种病变的患者进行手术的决定必须仔细权衡,并针对每个患者进行个体化处理。我们的2例因高级别异型增生而非癌症接受食管切除的患者死亡,1例术后立即死亡,另1例术后9个月因中风死亡。一旦记录到黏膜内癌,如果患者手术风险可接受,则应考虑手术。我们得出结论,对巴雷特食管完整黏膜进行系统的术前内镜活检可以正确检测出单独的高级别异型增生或与早期可治疗的腺癌合并存在的情况。