Orlandi Armando, Iattoni Elena, Pizzuti Laura, Fabbri Agnese, Botticelli Andrea, Di Dio Carmela, Palazzo Antonella, Garufi Giovanna, Indellicati Giulia, Alesini Daniele, Carbognin Luisa, Paris Ida, Vaccaro Angela, Moscetti Luca, Fabi Alessandra, Magri Valentina, Naso Giuseppe, Cassano Alessandra, Vici Patrizia, Giannarelli Diana, Franceschini Gianluca, Marchetti Paolo, Bria Emilio, Tortora Giampaolo
Comprehensive Cancer Center, UOC di Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Division of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute IRCCS, 00128 Rome, Italy.
J Pers Med. 2020 Dec 18;10(4):291. doi: 10.3390/jpm10040291.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) show meaningful efficacy and tolerability in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but the optimal sequence of ET has not been established. It is not clear if patients with lobular breast carcinomas (LBC) derive the same benefits when receiving second line CDK4/6i. This retrospective study compared the efficacy of palbociclib plus fulvestrant (PALBO-FUL) with everolimus plus exemestane (EVE-EXE) as second-line ET for hormone-resistant metastatic LBC. From 2013 to 2018, patients with metastatic LBC positivity for estrogen and/or progesterone receptors and HER2/neu negativity, who had relapsed during adjuvant hormonal therapy or first-line hormonal treatment, were enrolled from six centers in Italy in this retrospective study. A total of 74 out of 376 patients (48 treated with PALBO-FUL and 26 with EVE-EXE) with metastatic LBC were eligible for inclusion. Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in patients receiving EVE-EXE compared with PALBO-FUL (6.1 vs. 4.5 months, univariate HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.96; = 0.025). On the propensity score (PS) analysis, PFS was confirmed to be significantly longer for patients treated with EVE-EXE compared to PALBO-FUL (6.0 vs. 4.6 months, = 0.04). This retrospective analysis suggests that EVE-EXE is more effective than PALBO-FUL for second line ET of metastatic LBC, allowing us to speculate on the optimal therapeutic sequence.
细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)联合内分泌治疗(ET)在转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者中显示出显著的疗效和耐受性,但ET的最佳顺序尚未确定。目前尚不清楚小叶乳腺癌(LBC)患者接受二线CDK4/6i治疗时是否能获得同样的益处。这项回顾性研究比较了哌柏西利联合氟维司群(PALBO-FUL)与依维莫司联合依西美坦(EVE-EXE)作为激素抵抗性转移性LBC二线ET的疗效。2013年至 2018年,来自意大利六个中心的雌激素和/或孕激素受体阳性、HER2/neu阴性、在辅助激素治疗或一线激素治疗期间复发的转移性LBC患者被纳入这项回顾性研究。376例转移性LBC患者中,共有74例(48例接受PALBO-FUL治疗,26例接受EVE-EXE治疗)符合纳入标准。接受EVE-EXE治疗的患者无进展生存期(PFS)长于接受PALBO-FUL治疗的患者(6.1个月对4.5个月,单因素HR 0.58,95%CI 0.35-0.96;P = 0.025)。倾向评分(PS)分析证实,与PALBO-FUL相比,接受EVE-EXE治疗的患者PFS显著更长(6.0个月对4.6个月,P = 0.04)。这项回顾性分析表明,EVE-EXE在转移性LBC二线ET治疗中比PALBO-FUL更有效,这使我们能够推测最佳治疗顺序。