Suppr超能文献

与常规管理相比,跨诊断认知行为心理治疗对有常见心理健康问题的青少年的有效性:一项随机临床试验。

Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy Compared With Management as Usual for Youth With Common Mental Health Problems: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Jeppesen Pia, Wolf Rasmus Trap, Nielsen Sabrina M, Christensen Robin, Plessen Kerstin Jessica, Bilenberg Niels, Thomsen Per Hove, Thastum Mikael, Neumer Simon-Peter, Puggaard Louise Berg, Agner Pedersen Mette Maria, Pagsberg Anne Katrine, Silverman Wendy K, Correll Christoph U

机构信息

Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services-Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 1;78(3):250-260. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4045.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Behavioral therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) programs targeting a single class of problems have not been widely implemented. The population of youths with common mental health problems is markedly undertreated.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a new transdiagnostic CBT program (Mind My Mind [MMM]) compared with management as usual (MAU) in youths with emotional and behavioral problems below the threshold for referral to mental health care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This pragmatic, multisite, randomized clinical trial of MMM vs MAU was conducted from September 7, 2017, to August 28, 2019, including 8 weeks of postintervention follow-up, in 4 municipalities in Denmark. Consecutive help-seeking youths were randomized (1:1) to the MMM or the MAU group. Main inclusion criteria were age 6 to 16 years and anxiety, depressive symptoms, and/or behavioral disturbances as a primary problem. Data were analyzed from August 12 to October 25, 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

The MMM intervention consisted of 9 to 13 weekly, individually adapted sessions of manualized CBT delivered by local psychologists. The MAU group received 2 care coordination visits to enhance usual care.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in mental health problems reported by parents at week 18, using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Impact scale (range, 0-10 points, with higher scores indicating greater severity of distress and impairment). Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population at week 18. Maintenance effects were assessed at week 26.

RESULTS

A total of 396 youths (mean [SD] age, 10.3 [2.4] years; 206 [52.0%] boys) were randomized to MMM (n = 197) or MAU (n = 199), with primary outcome data available in 177 (89.8%) and 167 (83.9%), respectively, at 18 weeks. The SDQ Impact score decreased by 2.34 points with MMM and 1.23 with MAU, from initial scores of 4.12 and 4.21, respectively (between-group difference, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.75-1.45]; P < .001; Cohen d = 0.60). Number of responders (≥1-point reduction in SDQ Impact score) was greater with MMM than with MAU (144 of 197 [73.1%] vs 93 of 199 [46.7%]; number needed to treat, 4 [95% CI, 3-6]). Secondary outcomes indicated statistically significant benefits in parent-reported changes of anxiety, depressive symptoms, daily functioning, school attendance, and the principal problem. All benefits were maintained at week 26 except for school attendance.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, the scalable transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention MMM outperformed MAU in a community setting on multiple, clinically relevant domains in youth with emotional and behavioral problems.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03535805.

摘要

重要性

针对单一类问题的行为疗法和认知行为疗法(CBT)项目尚未得到广泛实施。患有常见心理健康问题的青少年群体明显未得到充分治疗。

目的

确定一种新的跨诊断CBT项目(关注自我心灵[MMM])与常规管理(MAU)相比,对情绪和行为问题未达心理健康护理转诊阈值的青少年的有效性。

设计、地点和参与者:这项关于MMM与MAU的务实、多地点、随机临床试验于2017年9月7日至2019年8月28日在丹麦的4个城市进行,包括干预后8周的随访。连续寻求帮助的青少年被随机(1:1)分配到MMM组或MAU组。主要纳入标准为年龄6至16岁,以焦虑、抑郁症状和/或行为障碍为主要问题。数据于2019年8月12日至10月25日进行分析。

干预措施

MMM干预包括由当地心理学家提供的9至13次每周一次、个体化定制的手册化CBT课程。MAU组接受2次护理协调访视以加强常规护理。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是在第18周时家长报告的心理健康问题变化,使用优势与困难问卷(SDQ)影响量表(范围为0至10分,分数越高表明痛苦和损害的严重程度越高)。在第18周时对意向性治疗人群评估主要和次要结局。在第26周时评估维持效果。

结果

共有396名青少年(平均[标准差]年龄为10.3[2.4]岁;206名[52.0%]为男孩)被随机分配到MMM组(n = 197)或MAU组(n = 199),在18周时分别有177名(89.8%)和167名(83.9%)可获得主要结局数据。MMM组的SDQ影响得分从初始得分4.12分下降了2.34分,MAU组从4.21分下降了1.23分(组间差异为1.10[95%CI,0.75 - 1.45];P <.001;Cohen d = 0.60)。反应者(SDQ影响得分降低≥1分)的数量MMM组多于MAU组(197名中的144名[73.1%]对199名中的93名[46.7%];需治疗人数为4[95%CI,3 - 6])。次要结局表明在家长报告的焦虑、抑郁症状、日常功能、上学出勤率和主要问题的变化方面有统计学上的显著益处。除上学出勤率外,所有益处在第26周时均得以维持。

结论与意义

在这项随机临床试验中,可扩展的跨诊断认知行为干预MMM在社区环境中,在情绪和行为问题青少年的多个临床相关领域的表现优于MAU。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03535805。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d18a/7758821/e4e2f277287b/jamapsychiatry-e204045-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验