Institute of Hygiene, University of Münster , Münster, Germany.
Institute for Infectiology, University of Münster , Münster, Germany.
Virulence. 2021 Dec;12(1):346-359. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1868841.
Whereas the O104:H4 enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) outbreak strain from 2011 expresses aggregative adherence fimbriae of subtype I (AAF/I), its close relative, the O104:H4 enteroaggregative (EAEC) strain 55989, encodes AAF of subtype III. Tight adherence mediated by AAF/I in combination with Shiga toxin 2 production has been suggested to result in the outbreak strain's exceptional pathogenicity. Furthermore, the O104:H4 outbreak strain adheres significantly better to cultured epithelial cells than archetypal EAEC strains expressing different AAF subtypes. To test whether AAF/I expression is associated with the different virulence phenotypes of the outbreak strain, we heterologously expressed AAF subtypes I, III, IV, and V in an AAF-negative EAEC 55989 mutant and compared AAF-mediated phenotypes, incl. autoaggregation, biofilm formation, as well as bacterial adherence to HEp-2 cells. We observed that the expression of all four AAF subtypes promoted bacterial autoaggregation, though with different kinetics. Disturbance of AAF interaction on the bacterial surface via addition of α-AAF antibodies impeded autoaggregation. Biofilm formation was enhanced upon heterologous expression of AAF variants and inversely correlated with the autoaggregation phenotype. Co-cultivation of bacteria expressing different AAF subtypes resulted in mixed bacterial aggregates. Interestingly, bacteria expressing AAF/I formed the largest bacterial clusters on HEp-2 cells, indicating a stronger host cell adherence similar to the EHEC O104:H4 outbreak strain. Our findings show that, compared to the closely related O104:H4 EAEC strain 55989, not only the acquisition of the Shiga toxin phage, but also the acquisition of the AAF/I subtype might have contributed to the increased EHEC O104:H4 pathogenicity.
虽然 2011 年的 O104:H4 肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)暴发菌株表达聚集粘附纤毛亚型 I(AAF/I),但其近亲 O104:H4 肠聚集性大肠杆菌(EAEC)菌株 55989 则编码亚型 III 的 AAF。据推测,AAF/I 介导的紧密粘附与志贺毒素 2 的产生相结合导致了暴发菌株的异常致病性。此外,与表达不同 AAF 亚型的典型 EAEC 菌株相比,O104:H4 暴发菌株对培养的上皮细胞的粘附能力显著增强。为了测试 AAF/I 的表达是否与暴发菌株的不同毒力表型相关,我们在 AAF 阴性的 EAEC 55989 突变体中异源表达了 AAF 亚型 I、III、IV 和 V,并比较了 AAF 介导的表型,包括自聚集、生物膜形成以及细菌对 HEp-2 细胞的粘附。我们观察到,所有四种 AAF 亚型的表达都促进了细菌的自聚集,尽管动力学不同。通过添加 α-AAF 抗体干扰细菌表面上的 AAF 相互作用,会阻碍自聚集。异源表达 AAF 变体增强了生物膜的形成,并且与自聚集表型呈负相关。不同 AAF 亚型表达的细菌共培养会导致混合细菌聚集体的形成。有趣的是,表达 AAF/I 的细菌在 HEp-2 细胞上形成最大的细菌簇,这表明与 EHEC O104:H4 暴发菌株类似,对宿主细胞的粘附能力更强。我们的研究结果表明,与密切相关的 O104:H4 EAEC 菌株 55989 相比,不仅获得了志贺毒素噬菌体,而且还获得了 AAF/I 亚型,这可能导致了 EHEC O104:H4 致病性的增加。