School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador.
Science & Health Research Group, Quito, Ecuador.
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1855694. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1855694.
: Over the past decade, the political movement called 'Revolución Ciudadana' implemented a variety of policies and interventions (P&I) in Ecuador to improve higher education and strengthen local research capacity. We refer specifically to the 'Mandato 14' and the Higher Education Law (LOES, Spanish acronym) launched in 2008 and 2010, respectively. : To assess the impact of these P&I (Mandato 14/LOES) on the production of health sciences-related articles (HSRA), and the relationship of these HSRA with the country's health priorities. : A Scopus search was performed to retrieve HSRA published from 1999 to 2017. Bivariate analysis was used to assess variation between the period I (1999-2008) and period II (2009-2017). Further, we examined the association between the top 10 causes of mortality and the total HSRA output. : The final study sample consisted of 2784 articles. After 2008, Ecuadorian production of HSRA increased steadily from 671 to 2133 publications (p<.001). Overall (1999-2017), the most common study design was cross-sectional (32.3%), the primary research focus was in the clinical-surgical area (49.3%), and the academic institutions were the primary drivers of scientific production during period II (56.9% vs. 29.5%, p<.001). Further, we found a decrease in the production of randomized controlled trials (6.7% vs. 1.8%, p<.001). Only 9% of research production involved the primary causes of mortality, and the proportion has remained unchanged over time (8.2% vs. 9.3%, p>.05). : Ecuadorian HSRA output increased significantly after 2008. This larger volume of scientific output could be the result to the Mandato 14/LOES implemented in the last decade. However, a low percentage of HSRA are dedicated to addressing the country's health priorities. Proper planning, execution and monitoring of national health research agendas would reduce the mismatch between health burden and the HSRA output in Ecuador and other low-and middle-income countries.
: 在过去的十年中,名为“公民革命”的政治运动在厄瓜多尔实施了各种政策和干预措施(P&I),以改善高等教育并加强当地的研究能力。我们特别提到的是分别于 2008 年和 2010 年推出的“第 14 号任务”和《高等教育法》(LOES)。 : 评估这些 P&I(第 14 号任务/LOES)对与健康科学相关的文章(HSRA)的生产的影响,以及这些 HSRA 与该国卫生重点之间的关系。 : 使用 Scopus 搜索检索了 1999 年至 2017 年期间发表的 HSRA。使用双变量分析评估了第一期(1999-2008 年)和第二期(2009-2017 年)之间的变化。此外,我们还检查了前 10 大死因与总 HSRA 产出之间的关联。 : 最终研究样本包括 2784 篇文章。2008 年之后,厄瓜多尔的 HSRA 产量从 671 篇稳步增加到 2133 篇(p<.001)。总体而言(1999-2017 年),最常见的研究设计是横断面研究(32.3%),主要研究重点是临床外科领域(49.3%),而第二期的学术机构是科学研究的主要驱动力(56.9%对 29.5%,p<.001)。此外,我们发现随机对照试验的产量下降(6.7%对 1.8%,p<.001)。只有 9%的研究涉及主要死因,而且这一比例随着时间的推移没有变化(8.2%对 9.3%,p>.05)。 : 2008 年之后,厄瓜多尔的 HSRA 产出显著增加。这种更大规模的科学产出可能是过去十年中实施的第 14 号任务/LOES 的结果。然而,只有一小部分 HSRA 致力于解决该国的卫生重点问题。适当规划,执行和监测国家卫生研究议程,将减少厄瓜多尔和其他中低收入国家卫生负担与 HSRA 产出之间的不匹配。