University Hospital Kerry, Tralee, Ireland.
Our Lady's Hospital, Navan, Ireland.
Indian Heart J. 2020 Nov-Dec;72(6):623-624. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) study was published recently demonstrating that over a period of 3.3 years a routine invasive approach along with optimised medical therapy (OMT) was not superior to OMT alone in patients with stable coronary artery disease and at least moderate to severe ischemia. Considerable interest and discussion have emerged over the applicability of the trial to real-world settings and the limitations of the trial. Given the fact that no clinical trial will ever be designed that will be perfect, it is important to prise out the pearls that the findings reveal and not interpret the findings as either positive or negative towards one approach or the other.
国际比较医学疗效与有创治疗研究(ISCHEMIA)最近发表的研究表明,在 3.3 年的时间内,对于稳定型冠状动脉疾病和至少中度至重度缺血的患者,常规有创方法加优化药物治疗(OMT)并不优于单独的 OMT。该试验对真实世界环境的适用性以及试验的局限性引起了相当大的关注和讨论。鉴于没有一个临床试验可以设计得完美无缺,重要的是要从研究结果中提取出精华,而不是将这些结果解读为对某一种方法是积极的还是消极的。