• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ISCHEMIA 随机临床试验参与者的基线特征和风险概况。

Baseline Characteristics and Risk Profiles of Participants in the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;4(3):273-286. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0014.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0014
PMID:30810700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6439551/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

It is unknown whether coronary revascularization, when added to optimal medical therapy, improves prognosis in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) at increased risk of cardiovascular events owing to moderate or severe ischemia.

OBJECTIVE

To describe baseline characteristics of participants enrolled and randomized in the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial and to evaluate whether qualification by stress imaging or nonimaging exercise tolerance test (ETT) influenced risk profiles.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The ISCHEMIA trial recruited patients with SIHD with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. Blinded coronary computed tomography angiography was performed in most participants and reviewed by a core laboratory to exclude left main stenosis of at least 50% or no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (<50% for imaging stress test and <70% for ETT). The study included 341 enrolling sites (320 randomizing) in 38 countries and patients with SIHD and moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. Data presented were extracted on December 17, 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Enrolled, excluded, and randomized participants' baseline characteristics. No clinical outcomes are reported.

RESULTS

A total of 8518 patients were enrolled, and 5179 were randomized. Common reasons for exclusion were core laboratory determination of insufficient ischemia, unprotected left main stenosis of at least 50%, or no stenosis that met study obstructive CAD criteria on study coronary computed tomography angiography. Randomized participants had a median age of 64 years, with 1168 women (22.6%), 1726 nonwhite participants (33.7%), 748 Hispanic participants (15.5%), 2122 with diabetes (41.0%), and 4643 with a history of angina (89.7%). Among the 3909 participants randomized after stress imaging, core laboratory assessment of ischemia severity (in 3901 participants) was severe in 1748 (44.8%), moderate in 1600 (41.0%), mild in 317 (8.1%) and none or uninterpretable in 236 (6.0%), Among the 1270 participants who were randomized after nonimaging ETT, core laboratory determination of ischemia severity (in 1266 participants) was severe (an eligibility criterion) in 1051 (83.0%), moderate in 101 (8.0%), mild in 34 (2.7%) and none or uninterpretable in 80 (6.3%). Among the 3912 of 5179 randomized participants who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography, 79.0% had multivessel CAD (n = 2679 of 3390) and 86.8% had left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis (n = 3190 of 3677) (proximal in 46.8% [n = 1749 of 3739]). Participants undergoing ETT had greater frequency of 3-vessel CAD, LAD, and proximal LAD stenosis than participants undergoing stress imaging.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The ISCHEMIA trial randomized an SIHD population with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing, of whom most had multivessel CAD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01471522.

摘要

重要性

对于因中度或重度缺血而处于心血管事件高风险的稳定型缺血性心脏病(SIHD)患者,在最佳药物治疗的基础上增加冠状动脉血运重建是否能改善预后尚不清楚。

目的

描述国际比较有效性研究中比较药物和介入治疗的稳定性缺血性心脏病(ISCHEMIA)试验入组和随机分组患者的基线特征,并评估是否通过应激成像或非成像运动耐量试验(ETT)进行资格筛选会影响风险状况。

设计、地点和参与者:ISCHEMIA 试验招募了在应激试验中存在中度或重度缺血的 SIHD 患者。大多数参与者接受了盲法冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影检查,并由核心实验室进行了审查,以排除至少 50%的左主干狭窄或无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)(<50%的影像学应激试验和<70%的 ETT)。该研究包括来自 38 个国家的 341 个入组地点(320 个随机分组)和 SIHD 患者,以及应激试验中存在中度或重度缺血的患者。提取数据的时间为 2018 年 12 月 17 日。

主要结果和测量

入组、排除和随机分组患者的基线特征。未报告临床结局。

结果

共有 8518 例患者入组,其中 5179 例被随机分组。常见的排除原因是核心实验室确定缺血程度不足、未保护的左主干狭窄至少 50%或研究冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影无符合研究阻塞性 CAD 标准的狭窄。随机分组的患者中位年龄为 64 岁,其中 1168 例为女性(22.6%),1726 例为非白人(33.7%),748 例为西班牙裔(15.5%),2122 例患有糖尿病(41.0%),4643 例有胸痛史(89.7%)。在 3909 例接受应激成像后随机分组的患者中,核心实验室评估的缺血严重程度(在 3901 例患者中)为严重的有 1748 例(44.8%),中度的有 1600 例(41.0%),轻度的有 317 例(8.1%),无或无法解释的有 236 例(6.0%)。在 1270 例接受非成像 ETT 后随机分组的患者中,核心实验室确定的缺血严重程度(在 1266 例患者中)为严重(入选标准)的有 1051 例(83.0%),中度的有 101 例(8.0%),轻度的有 34 例(2.7%),无或无法解释的有 80 例(6.3%)。在 5179 例随机分组的患者中,有 3912 例行冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影检查,其中 79.0%有多支血管 CAD(3390 例中有 2679 例),86.8%有左前降支(LAD)狭窄(3677 例中有 3190 例)(近端 46.8%[3739 例中有 1749 例])。行 ETT 的患者与行应激成像的患者相比,有更高的三支血管 CAD、LAD 和近端 LAD 狭窄发生率。

结论和相关性

ISCHEMIA 试验随机分组的是在应激试验中存在中度或重度缺血的 SIHD 患者,其中大多数患者有多支血管 CAD。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01471522。

相似文献

1
Baseline Characteristics and Risk Profiles of Participants in the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial.ISCHEMIA 随机临床试验参与者的基线特征和风险概况。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;4(3):273-286. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0014.
2
Association of Sex With Severity of Coronary Artery Disease, Ischemia, and Symptom Burden in Patients With Moderate or Severe Ischemia: Secondary Analysis of the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial.性别与中度或重度缺血患者的冠状动脉疾病严重程度、缺血和症状负担的关系:ISCHEMIA 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;5(7):773-786. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0822.
3
International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and design.国际比较医疗与介入治疗缺血效果研究(ISCHEMIA)试验:原理与设计。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
4
Predictors of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in the ISCHEMIA Trial.ISCHEMIA 试验中左主干冠状动脉疾病的预测因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Feb 22;79(7):651-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.052.
5
Relationship Between Severity of Ischemia and Coronary Artery Disease for Different Stress Test Modalities in the ISCHEMIA Trial.缺血性心脏病试验中不同负荷试验方式下缺血严重程度与冠状动脉疾病的关系
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Dec;17(12):e013743. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013743. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
6
Ischemia With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的缺血:来自 ISCHEMIA 试验的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Jan;16(1):63-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.06.015. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
7
Value of Ischemia and Coronary Anatomy in Prognosis and Guiding Revascularization Among Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.稳定性缺血性心脏病患者预后及指导血运重建中缺血与冠状动脉解剖的价值。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Sep;17(9):e016587. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.016587. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
8
Comparison of risk profiles of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce events In non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial, using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Invasive Coronary Angiography.比较使用冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术与有创冠状动脉造影术对 Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce events In non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) 试验中参与者的风险特征。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 May-Jun;84:90-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.03.008. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
9
Evaluating the Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Using Randomized Data From the ISCHEMIA Trial.利用来自缺血性心脏病优化药物治疗与血管重建比较有效性研究(ISCHEMIA试验)的随机数据评估稳定型缺血性心脏病冠状动脉血运重建的适宜使用标准。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Mar;18(3):e010849. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.010849. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
10
Comparison of Days Alive Out of Hospital With Initial Invasive vs Conservative Management: A Prespecified Analysis of the ISCHEMIA Trial.与初始侵入性与保守性管理相比存活出院日的比较:ISCHEMIA 试验的预先指定分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Sep 1;6(9):1023-1031. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.1651.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Prognosis by Stress ECG and Stress Imaging: Results From the ISCHEMIA Trial.通过负荷心电图和负荷成像进行的比较预后:来自缺血性心脏病优化药物治疗策略(ISCHEMIA)试验的结果
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.03.016.
2
Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Complete Angina Relief in Symptomatic Patients in the ISCHEMIA Trial.缺血性心脏病改善症状与认知治疗(ISCHEMIA)试验中症状性患者完全性心绞痛缓解的发生率、预测因素及结果
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):e040057. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040057. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
3
Use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention and associated outcomes in the ISCHEMIA trial.在缺血性心脏病(ISCHEMIA)试验中冠状动脉搭桥手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的应用及相关结果
Am Heart J. 2025 Nov;289:78-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.05.009. Epub 2025 May 20.
4
Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA Trial.ISCHEMIA试验中的指南导向性药物治疗与结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Apr 1;85(12):1317-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.01.028.
5
Diagnosing and treating stable angina: a contemporary approach for practicing physicians.稳定型心绞痛的诊断与治疗:执业医师的现代方法
Future Cardiol. 2025 Apr;21(5):291-303. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2479970. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
6
Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Moderate or Severe Myocardial Ischemia: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.中度或重度心肌缺血患者的负荷超声心动图:来自缺血性心脏病(ISCHEMIA)试验的见解
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2025 Jun;38(6):465-481. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.03.006. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
7
Relationship Between Severity of Ischemia and Coronary Artery Disease for Different Stress Test Modalities in the ISCHEMIA Trial.缺血性心脏病试验中不同负荷试验方式下缺血严重程度与冠状动脉疾病的关系
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Dec;17(12):e013743. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013743. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
8
Reassessing the Role of Ischemia Imaging: Insights from the ISCHEMIA Trial.重新评估缺血成像的作用:来自缺血性心脏病优化药物治疗与侵入性治疗比较试验(ISCHEMIA)的见解
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Dec;58(7):392-399. doi: 10.1007/s13139-023-00834-1. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
9
Evolving Role of Coronary CT Angiography in Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A State-of-the-Art Review.冠状动脉CT血管造影在冠状动脉造影及介入治疗中不断演变的作用:一项前沿综述
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):1347-1357. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02144-0. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
10
Ischemia-Guided Management Using Cardiac SPECT: Reconciling Real-World Evidence in a Post-ISCHEMIA Trial World.使用心脏单光子发射计算机断层扫描进行缺血引导管理:在后缺血试验时代协调现实世界证据
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Sep;17(9):e017377. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.017377. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and design.国际比较医疗与介入治疗缺血效果研究(ISCHEMIA)试验:原理与设计。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
2
Effect of Coronary Revascularization on the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Contrast Wall Motion and Perfusion Imaging.冠状动脉血运重建对负荷心肌对比壁运动及灌注成像预后价值的影响
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 31;6(6):e006202. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006202.
3
Comparison of 5-Year Outcomes for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in Groups With and Without Revascularization With Different Results of Stress Echocardiography.不同负荷超声心动图结果的冠状动脉疾病患者血运重建组与非血运重建组的5年结局比较。
Cardiol Res. 2013 Oct;4(4-5):152-158. doi: 10.4021/cr294e. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
4
Value of Exercise ECG for Risk Stratification in Suspected or Known CAD in the Era of Advanced Imaging Technologies.在先进成像技术时代,运动心电图对疑似或已知冠心病患者进行危险分层的价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Nov;8(11):1309-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.09.006.
5
Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes.血流储备分数的预后价值:将生理学严重程度与临床结果联系起来。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 21;64(16):1641-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.973.
6
Comparative definitions for moderate-severe ischemia in stress nuclear, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging.负荷心肌核素显像、超声心动图及磁共振成像中中重度心肌缺血的对比定义。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;7(6):593-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.10.021.
7
Predicting outcome in the COURAGE trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation): coronary anatomy versus ischemia.预测 COURAGE 试验(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与强化药物治疗的临床结果评估)的结局:冠状动脉解剖与缺血。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.10.017. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
8
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease.临界血流储备分数指导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与稳定型冠心病的药物治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
9
Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.在接受应激-静息心肌灌注闪烁显像的患者中,缺血和瘢痕对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗的疗效的影响。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Apr;32(8):1012-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq500. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
10
Prognostic implications of stress echocardiography and impact on patient outcomes: an effective gatekeeper for coronary angiography and revascularization.超声心动图应激试验的预后意义及其对患者预后的影响:冠状动脉造影和血运重建的有效把关者。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Aug;23(8):832-9. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.004.