Suppr超能文献

单平台ISHAGE方案在巴西某中心用于脐带血中CD34+造血干细胞计数的验证

Validation of the single-platform ISHAGE protocol for enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells in umbilical cord blood in a Brazilian center.

作者信息

Pedrosa de Lira de Morais Carla Cristina, Dias Alves Pinto Juliana, Wagner de Souza Karen, Izu Marina, Fernando da Silva Bouzas Luis, Henrique Paraguassú-Braga Flávio

机构信息

Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2022 Jan-Mar;44(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.09.151. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to validate the single-platform method for enumeration of CD34+ cells, by comparing the performance of two different commercial kits, as well as to evaluate the efficiency of the Accuri C6 cytometer in providing direct counts of absolute cell numbers.

METHOD

We evaluated 20 samples from umbilical cord blood (UCB), comparing the two different methodologies for enumeration of CD34+ cells: single and dual-platform. For the assessment of the single-platform, Procount and SCE kits were used, both of which use fluorescent beads as a counting reference to obtain absolute CD34+ cells numbers. Moreover, after the acquisition of samples in flow cytometer Accuri C6, following the protocol established for each kit, the number of CD34+ cells was recalculated, considering the cell count provided by the Accuri C6.

MAIN RESULTS

In our analysis, the results showed a strong correlation between the number of CD34+ cells/μL (r=0.77) when comparing the SCE kit and the current dual-platform method. On the other hand, the comparison between Procount kit and dual-platform results showed a moderate correlation for the number of CD34+/μL cells (r=0.64).

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that the Accuri C6 flow cytometer can be used safely, applying both the dual and single platform analysis strategy. Considering the ISHAGE protocol-based single-platform approach, as the most appropriate methodology for CD34+ cells enumeration, our results demonstrated that the SCE kit has great potential for national standardization of UCB samples analysis methodology.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过比较两种不同商业试剂盒的性能,验证用于计数CD34+细胞的单平台方法,并评估Accuri C6细胞仪提供绝对细胞数直接计数的效率。

方法

我们评估了20份脐带血(UCB)样本,比较了两种不同的CD34+细胞计数方法:单平台法和双平台法。为评估单平台法,使用了Procount和SCE试剂盒,这两种试剂盒均使用荧光微球作为计数参考以获得绝对CD34+细胞数。此外,在Accuri C6流式细胞仪中采集样本后,按照每个试剂盒制定的方案,重新计算CD34+细胞数,同时考虑Accuri C6提供的细胞计数。

主要结果

在我们的分析中,比较SCE试剂盒和当前双平台方法时,结果显示CD34+细胞/μL数量之间存在强相关性(r = 0.77)。另一方面,Procount试剂盒与双平台结果之间的比较显示,CD34+/μL细胞数量存在中度相关性(r = 0.64)。

结论

我们的结果表明,Accuri C6流式细胞仪可安全使用,应用双平台和单平台分析策略。考虑到基于ISHAGE方案的单平台方法是计数CD34+细胞最合适的方法,我们的结果表明SCE试剂盒在UCB样本分析方法的国家标准化方面具有巨大潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff6/8885393/32f56f20aac8/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验