Pedrosa de Lira de Morais Carla Cristina, Dias Alves Pinto Juliana, Wagner de Souza Karen, Izu Marina, Fernando da Silva Bouzas Luis, Henrique Paraguassú-Braga Flávio
Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2022 Jan-Mar;44(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.09.151. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
This study aims to validate the single-platform method for enumeration of CD34+ cells, by comparing the performance of two different commercial kits, as well as to evaluate the efficiency of the Accuri C6 cytometer in providing direct counts of absolute cell numbers.
We evaluated 20 samples from umbilical cord blood (UCB), comparing the two different methodologies for enumeration of CD34+ cells: single and dual-platform. For the assessment of the single-platform, Procount and SCE kits were used, both of which use fluorescent beads as a counting reference to obtain absolute CD34+ cells numbers. Moreover, after the acquisition of samples in flow cytometer Accuri C6, following the protocol established for each kit, the number of CD34+ cells was recalculated, considering the cell count provided by the Accuri C6.
In our analysis, the results showed a strong correlation between the number of CD34+ cells/μL (r=0.77) when comparing the SCE kit and the current dual-platform method. On the other hand, the comparison between Procount kit and dual-platform results showed a moderate correlation for the number of CD34+/μL cells (r=0.64).
Our results showed that the Accuri C6 flow cytometer can be used safely, applying both the dual and single platform analysis strategy. Considering the ISHAGE protocol-based single-platform approach, as the most appropriate methodology for CD34+ cells enumeration, our results demonstrated that the SCE kit has great potential for national standardization of UCB samples analysis methodology.
本研究旨在通过比较两种不同商业试剂盒的性能,验证用于计数CD34+细胞的单平台方法,并评估Accuri C6细胞仪提供绝对细胞数直接计数的效率。
我们评估了20份脐带血(UCB)样本,比较了两种不同的CD34+细胞计数方法:单平台法和双平台法。为评估单平台法,使用了Procount和SCE试剂盒,这两种试剂盒均使用荧光微球作为计数参考以获得绝对CD34+细胞数。此外,在Accuri C6流式细胞仪中采集样本后,按照每个试剂盒制定的方案,重新计算CD34+细胞数,同时考虑Accuri C6提供的细胞计数。
在我们的分析中,比较SCE试剂盒和当前双平台方法时,结果显示CD34+细胞/μL数量之间存在强相关性(r = 0.77)。另一方面,Procount试剂盒与双平台结果之间的比较显示,CD34+/μL细胞数量存在中度相关性(r = 0.64)。
我们的结果表明,Accuri C6流式细胞仪可安全使用,应用双平台和单平台分析策略。考虑到基于ISHAGE方案的单平台方法是计数CD34+细胞最合适的方法,我们的结果表明SCE试剂盒在UCB样本分析方法的国家标准化方面具有巨大潜力。