Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, Minnesota; Section of Interventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, Dallas, TX.
Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2254-2263. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in sepsis and septic shock has been infrequently studied and has uncertain prognostic significance.
Does RV function impact mortality in sepsis and septic shock?
We reviewed the published literature from January 1999 to April 2020 for studies evaluating adult patients with sepsis and septic shock. Study definition of RV dysfunction was used to classify patients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality divided into short-term mortality (ICU stay, hospital stay, or mortality ≤30 days) and long-term mortality (>30 days). Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined, using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.
Ten studies, 1,373 patients, were included; RV dysfunction was noted in 477 (34.7%). RV dysfunction was variably classified as decreased RV systolic motion, high RV/left ventricular ratio and decreased RV ejection fraction. Septic shock, ARDS, and mechanical ventilation were noted in 82.0%, 27.5%, and 78.4% of the population, respectively. Patients with RV dysfunction had lower rates of mechanical ventilation (71.9% vs 81.9%; P < .001), higher rates of acute hemodialysis (38.1% vs 22.4%; P = .04), but comparable rates of septic shock and ARDS. Studies showed moderate (I = 58%) and low (I = 49%) heterogeneity for short-term and long-term mortality, respectively. RV dysfunction was associated with higher short-term (pooled OR, 2.42; 95%CI, 1.52-3.85; P = .0002) (10 studies) and long-term (pooled OR, 2.26; 95%CI, 1.29-3.95; P = .004) (4 studies) mortality.
In this meta-analysis of observational studies, RV dysfunction was associated with higher short-term and long-term mortality in sepsis and septic shock.
脓毒症和感染性休克患者的右心室(RV)功能障碍研究较少,其预后意义尚不确定。
RV 功能是否会影响脓毒症和感染性休克患者的死亡率?
我们检索了 1999 年 1 月至 2020 年 4 月期间发表的评估成人脓毒症和感染性休克患者的文献。研究采用 RV 功能障碍的定义来对患者进行分类。主要结局为全因死亡率,分为短期死亡率(入住 ICU、住院或 30 天内死亡)和长期死亡率(>30 天)。采用 DerSimonian 和 Laird 的随机效应、通用倒数方差法提取和合并来自各个研究的效应估计值。
共纳入 10 项研究,1373 例患者,其中 477 例(34.7%)存在 RV 功能障碍。RV 功能障碍的分类为 RV 收缩运动减弱、RV 与左心室比值高和 RV 射血分数降低。人群中分别有 82.0%、27.5%和 78.4%患有脓毒性休克、ARDS 和机械通气。RV 功能障碍患者机械通气使用率较低(71.9% vs 81.9%;P<0.001),急性血液透析使用率较高(38.1% vs 22.4%;P=0.04),但脓毒性休克和 ARDS 的发生率相似。研究结果显示,短期和长期死亡率的异质性分别为中等(I=58%)和低(I=49%)。RV 功能障碍与短期(汇总 OR,2.42;95%CI,1.52-3.85;P=0.0002)(10 项研究)和长期(汇总 OR,2.26;95%CI,1.29-3.95;P=0.004)(4 项研究)死亡率较高相关。
在这项脓毒症和感染性休克的观察性研究荟萃分析中,RV 功能障碍与短期和长期死亡率较高相关。